Company E offered information, products and, services to IT professionals through a family of websites for tasks and giving solutions in business. Person S joined as Vice President, Worldwide Content signing non-compete agreement which stated that he cannot join in a company directly competing with company E for a period of 12 months after his termination. To discuss: The arguments that supports company E’s non-compete covenant.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 1TS

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company E offered information, products and, services to IT professionals through a family of websites for tasks and giving solutions in business. Person S joined as Vice President, Worldwide Content signing non-compete agreement which stated that he cannot join in a company directly competing with company E for a period of 12 months after his termination.

To discuss: The arguments that supports company E’s non-compete covenant.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Companies A and B differ only in their capital structure. A is financed 30% debt and 70% equity: B is financed 10% debt and 90% equity. The debt of both companies is risk-free. a. Rosencrantz owns 1% of the common stock of A. What other investment package would produce identical cash flow for Rosencrantz? b. Guildenstern owns 2% of common stock of B. What other investment package would produce identical cash flows for Guildenstern?

SECTION B Read the following extract and then answer the question belowTwo business entities come to you for assistance and they would like enter into a stock agreement supply. The other is a manufacturer and one is a retailer. It is their fist time to be committing to such a huge business arrangement and they both realise that it is important to do it right because as much as it looks like a great business deal, should it fail to work, it can lead to serious business losses that can even lead to liquidation and litigation. All they ask for is to be advised on the essentials of a valid business contract, and the need to explain conditions for compensating parties for breach of contract. In doing that, it is important to quote relevant authorities. Evaluate how the two enterprises need to be assisted.

Noodleoo, a struggling restaurant chain, wants to enact a franchise agreement with Stephen to sell its product through a chain-style franchise. Stephen agrees and opens the store, and 6 months later Noodleoo goes bankrupt. Which is most likely true of this situation? Stephen was not responsible for looking into the financial status of Noodleoo before making the agreement. The Franchise rule does not apply to struggling companies. If Noodleoo was not transparent with its financial data, Stephen has no recourse. If Noodleoo was not transparent with its financial data, it has broken the Franchise Rule.