Company E offered information, products and, services to IT professionals through a family of websites for tasks and giving solutions in business. Person S joined as Vice President, Worldwide Content signing non-compete agreement which stated that he cannot join in a company directly competing with company E for a period of 12 months after his termination. To discuss: The arguments that supports the person S’s position that the covenant is not enforceable.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 2TS

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Company E offered information, products and, services to IT professionals through a family of websites for tasks and giving solutions in business. Person S joined as Vice President, Worldwide Content signing non-compete agreement which stated that he cannot join in a company directly competing with company E for a period of 12 months after his termination.

To discuss: The arguments that supports the person S’s position that the covenant is not enforceable.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Mikhail and Dana Jackson, doing business as M&D Enterprises, Inc., bought a retail electronics store under a franchise agreement from a national company, Tunes Hut. The Jacksons borrowed from State Bank to pay for the business and signed loan documents and a financing statement, which identified the Jacksons as "Debtors." Elsewhere on the financing statement, the bank identified "M&D Enterprises, Inc., Tunes Hut, Dana K. Jackson, Mikhail C. Jackson" as "Debtors." The statement covered, in part, the store inventory. The bank filed the financing statement with the proper government agency. Three years later, the store closed. Tunes Hut terminated the franchise and took possession of the inventory, claiming the Jacksons and M&D owed Tunes Hut $6,394.73. State Bank filed a suit in a state court against Tunes Hut, claiming a perfected security interest in the inventory with priority over Tunes Hut's claim. Did the bank's security interest take priority over Tunes Hut’s…

State whether the following agreements or contracts are void, voidable valid, and provide a reason for your answer Q.2.6 Paul, an unrehabilitated insolvent, enters into an agreement to sell an asset which is excluded from the insolvent estate.Q.2.7 Jennifer is married to Mark in community of property. She signs surety for a loan that her sister has taken out, however she did talk to Mark about it over the telephone and he verbally agreed. Q.2.8 Caleb, aged 10, accepts a donation from his grandparent. Caleb was not assisted by a parent.

Sally and Tom decide to go into business, selling discounted merchandise through their website “e-Buy.” They sign a partnership agreement that requires Sally to contribute $12,000 and Tom to contribute $8,000 in capital to start the firm. The agreement also states that only Sally will have the authority to bind the partnership in deals with third parties, but the agreement says nothing about the management of the firm or a division of profits. Without Sally’s knowledge, Tom tells United Computer Products, Inc., that he represents the firm and signs a contract with United to buy hard drives for resale on e-Buy. In the first year, e-Buy makes a profit of $50,000. What are the partners’ rights with respect to the management of the firm? Is the partnership bound to the contract with United? Do the partners split the first year’s profits? If so, how much is each entitled to?