(a)
To find the reason for less marginal cost of firm 1.
(a)
Explanation of Solution
Firm 1 is an old firm which is operating from last 1 year in industry. It is operating at economies of scale. So, its marginal cost would be lower than the new firm.
(b)
To analyze current profit of two firms.
(b)
Explanation of Solution
Industry’s inverse demand function is given as:
Market price is $15. At equilibrium level of market, P = MC
The market
For firm 1:
Total revenue can be calculated as:
Total cost is the summation of variable cost and fixed cost. Fixed cost is $2 million. Variable cost can be calculated as:
Total cost is:
For firm 2,
Total revenue can be calculated as:
Total cost is the summation of variable cost and fixed cost. Fixed cost is $2 million. Variable cost can be calculated as:
Total cost is:
(c)
To analyze the effect of decrease in price by firm 1.
(c)
Explanation of Solution
When firm 1 decreases the price to $10, he captures whole market share.
Industry’s inverse demand function is given as:
For firm 1,
Price is charged $10. At equilibrium level of market, P = MC
The equilibrium quantity for firm 1 is 2 million.
Total revenue can be calculated as:
Total cost is the summation of variable cost and fixed cost. Fixed cost is $2 million. Variable cost can be calculated as:
Total cost is:
Firm 2:
Firm 2 loses its entire market share as it charges $15.
Total revenue can be calculated as:
Total cost is the summation of variable cost and fixed cost. Fixed cost is $2 million. Variable cost can be calculated as:
Total cost is:
Hence, firm 2 is incurring a loss of $2 million.
(d)
To analyze whether the firm 1 has incentive to raise price after the exit of firm 2 from the market.
(d)
Explanation of Solution
When the firm 2 exits the market, firm 1 is the sole producer. It has
(e)
To analyze whether the firm 1 is engaged in predatory pricing.
(e)
Explanation of Solution
Predatory pricing is the act of pricing products or services so low that other competitors are not able to compete and are forced to leave the market.
The marginal cost of firm 2 is $10. When the price was $15, both the firms were earning extra normal profits. When the firm 1 lowers its price to $10, the firm 2 can also lower its price in order to capture the equal market share. In this manner, its price would be equal to the MC. He would be on equilibrium.
Hence, the firm 1 has not done predatory pricing. Firm 2 can compete with firm 1 till $10 because the MC of firm 2 is $10.
When the firm 1 lowers the price below 10, then it would be called predatory pricing.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 13 Solutions
MANAGERIAL ECON.+BUS.STRAT.(LL)>CUSTOM<
- You are the manager of BlackSpot Computers, which competes directly with Condensed Computers to sell highpowered computers to businesses. From the two businesses’ perspectives, the two products are indistinguishable. The large investment required to build production facilities prohibits other firms from entering this market, and existing firms operate under the assumption that the rival will hold output constant. The inverse market demand for computers is P=5900-Q , and both firms produce at a marginal cost of $800 per computer. Currently, BlackSpot earns revenues of $4.25 million and profits (net of investment, R&D, and other fixed costs) of $890,000. The engineering department at BlackSpot has been steadily working on developing an assembly method that would dramatically reduce the marginal cost of producing these high-powered computers and has found a process that allows it to manufacture each computer at a marginal cost of $500. How will this technological advance impact your…arrow_forwardAssume the market shares of the six largest firms in an industry are 15 percent each. The six-firm concentration ratio would indicate that the industry is highly concentrated, while the Herfindahl- Hirschman Index would not. True OR False? If the inputs to a production process are perfect substitutes and the marginal rate of technical substitution is equal to the ratio of the prices of the two inputs, the firm can choose from a virtually infinite array of combinations of the two inputs to minimize the costs of producing a given level of output. True OR False?arrow_forwardExercise 6.8. Two companies with cost functions C1 (q1 )=5q1 and C2 (q2)= 0.5 q2 ² supply the to the same market. If the inverse market demand function is given by P = 100 - 0,5Q , where Q = q₁ + q₂ , find a) The production level of each firm, the price and the profits if the companies compete according to the Cournot model. (b) The level of production of each undertaking, the price and the profits if the undertakings agree to jointly maximise their profits. Show the results with the help of graphs.arrow_forward
- Suppose that two European electronics companies, Siemens (Firm S) and Alcatel-Lucent (Firm T), jointly hold a patent on a component used in airport radar systems. - Demand for the component is given by the following function \[ P=1,000-Q \] - The total cost functions of manufacturing and selling the component for the respective firms are \[ \begin{array}{c} T C_{S}=70,000+5 Q_{S}+0.25 Q_{S}^{2} \\ T C_{T}=110,000+5 Q_{T}+0.15 Q_{T}^{2} \end{array} \] Assume that the firms agreed to form cartel and calculate the joint profit.arrow_forwardYou are the manager of a firm that manufactures front and rear windshields for the automobile industry. Due to economies of scale in the industry, entry by new firms is not profitable. Toyota has asked your company and your only rival to simultaneously submit a price quote for supplying 100,000 front and rear windshields for its new Highlander. If both you and your rival submit a low price, each firm supplies 50,000 front and rear windshields and earns a $1 million in profits. If one firm quotes a low price and the other a high price, the low-price firm supplies 100,000 front and rear windshields and earns a profit of $11 million and the high-price firm supplies no windshields and loses $2 million. If both firms quote a high price, each firm supplies 50,000 front and rear windshields and earns a $6 million profit. The new Highlander is a “special edition” that will be sold only for one year. a. Supported by this information, complete the payoff matrix. (values are in million)…arrow_forwardConsider two product designers compete where to place their product in the product space. Assume the product space is the interval from 0 to 1, including the end points. The prices of the product are fixed. Product designers place their product simultaneously in the product space. Consumer’s ideal product is spread out uniformly over the product space. Consumers like to choose their ideal product. If they cannot get their ideal product, they incur a disutility that depends linearly on the distance from their ideal product. (The disutility only depends linearly on the distance from their ideal product.) Each consumer has enough income to buy one product even if the distance from their own ideal product is 1. a. Where will the two products be placed in the Nash equilibrium if the locations of the product in the product space are chosen simultaneously? Explain. b. What are the socially optimal locations, i.e. the best locations from society’s point of view that minimise transportation…arrow_forward
- You are the manager of BlackSpot Computers, which competes directly with Condensed Computers to sell high-powered computers to businesses. From the two businesses’ perspectives, the two products are indistinguishable. The large investment required to build production facilities prohibits other firms from entering this market, and existing firms operate under the assumption that the rival will hold output constant. The inverse market demand for computers is P = 5,900 − Q, and both firms produce at a marginal cost of $800 per computer. Currently, BlackSpot earns revenues of $4.25 million and profits (net of investment, R&D, and other fixed costs) of $890,000. The engineering department at BlackSpot has been steadily working on developing an assembly method that would dramatically reduce the marginal cost of producing these high-powered computers and has found a process that allows it to manufacture each computer at a marginal cost of $500. How will this technological advance impact…arrow_forwardTwo firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2, compete by simultaneously choosing prices. Both firms sell an identical product for which each of 100 consumers has a maximum willingness to pay of $40. Each consumer will buy at most 1 unit, and will buy it from whichever firm charges the lowest price. If both firms set the same price, they share the market equally. Costs are given by c; (q) = 16q;. Because of government regulation, firms can only choose prices which are integer numbers, and they cannot price above $40. Answer the following: a) If Firm 1 chooses pi = 32, Firm 2's best response is to set what price? b) If Firm 2 chooses the price determined in the previous question, Firm 1's best response is to choose what price? c) If Firm 1 chooses pi = 9, Firm 2's best response is a range of prices. What is the lowest price in this range? d) Now suppose both firms are capacity-constrained: Firm 1 can produce at most 42 units, and Firm 2 can produce at most 44 units. If firms set different prices,…arrow_forwardGiven the following demand and supply functions for two competing products. Qd1 =82 – 3p1 + p2; Qs1 = 15p1 – 5; Qd2 = 92 + 2p1 – 4p2; Qs2 = 32p2 - 6 Determine whether there are prices which bring the supply and demand levels into equilibrium for the two products. If so, what are the equilibrium quantities?arrow_forward
- Assume the price of product A increases from $1 to $1.50, while the price of competing product B increases from $1.50 to $2.00. Based on the information, what we can say about the absolute and relative price differences between the two products and the relative attractiveness of the two products to consumers.arrow_forwardSuppose you are the economic adviser of a company producing three brands of mobile phones; Nokia 10 , Samsung X and iPhone Z. Suppose further that, your company currently sells 120 units of iPhone Z at ¢800 per unit, 150 units of Samsung X at ¢800 per unit and 200 units of Nokia 10 at ¢100 per unit, but in a bid to maximize profit, the company’s managing director proposes an increase in price of Samsung X from ¢800 to ¢1000 per unit for which quantity demanded is anticipated to fall from 150 to 100 units; iPhone Z from ¢800 to ¢1200 per unit for which quantity demanded is anticipated to fall from 120 to 100 units; and Nokia 10 from¢100 to ¢200 per unit for which quantity demanded is expected to fall from 200 to 100 units. 1.Using the mid-point formula, compute the price elasticity of demand for each brand.2. From your answer in i, what is the type and economic interpretation of each brand’s value of elasticity.arrow_forwardOLIGOPOLY 1.- Each of two firms, firms 1 and 2, has a cost function C(q) = 30q; the inverse demand function for the firms' output is p = 120-Q, where Q is the total output. Firms simultaneously choose their output and the market price is that at which demand exactly absorbs the total output (Cournot model).(a) Obtain the reaction function of a firm.(b) Map the function obtained in (a), and graphically represent the Cournot equilibrium in this market.(c) Repeat (b), this time analytically.(d) Now suppose that firm 1's cost function is C(q) = 45q instead, but firm 2's cost is unchanged. Analyze the new solution in the market.(e) Obtain the total surplus, consumer surplus, and industry profits in both cases, and compare. What is the effect of the worsening in firm 1's cost?arrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning