EP ECONOMICS,AP EDITION-CONNECT ACCESS
20th Edition
ISBN: 9780021403455
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13.A, Problem 3ADQ
To determine
The outcome of a sequential game with no collusion.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Wal-Mart's dominant strategy is to pick a price of $.
Target
Price = $30
Price = $17
%3D
What is the Nash equilibrium for this game?
$6,000
$1,500
O A. The Nash equilibrium is for Target to choose a price of $17 and Wal-Mart to choose
a price of $30.
Price = $30
$6,000
$11,000
O B. The Nash equilibrium is for Target and Wal-Mart to both choose a price of $30.
Wal - Mart
C. The Nash equilibrium is for Target to choose a price of $30 and Wal-Mart to choose
a price of $17.
$11,000
$4,500
Price = $17
%3D
$1,500
$4,500
O D. The Nash equilibrium is for Target and Wal-Mart to both choose a price of $17.
South
OE.
O E. A Nash equilibrium does not exist for this game.
18. Answer the next question based on the payoff matrix for a two-firm oligopoly where the
numbers represent the firms' respective profits given each of their pricing strategies:
FIRM Y
O $ 800,000
O $1,000,000
O $1,450,000
Strategies:
High-price
If both firms collude to maximize joint profits,
O $1,250,000
FIRM X
High-price
X = $625,000
Y = $625,000
Low-price X = $275,000
Y = $725,000
Low Price
X = $725,000
Y = $275,000
X = $400,000
Y = $400,000
tal profits for the two firms will be:
Suppose that Firm A and Firm B are independently deciding whether to sell at a low price or a high price. The payoff matrix below
shows the profits per year for each company resulting from the two price options.
Firm B High Price
Firm B Low Price
$5 million
$2 million
$3 million
$1 million
$4 million
$5 million
$2 million
$3 million
a. Does Firm A have a dominant strategy?
O The dominant strategy for Firm A is a low price.
O No, there is no dominant strategy for Firm A.
O The dominant strategy for Firm A is a high price.
b. Does Firm B have a dominant strategy?
O The dominant strategy for Firm B is a low price.
O The dominant strategy for Firm B is a high price.
O No, there is no dominant strategy for Firm B.
Firm A Low Price Firm A High Price
Chapter 13 Solutions
EP ECONOMICS,AP EDITION-CONNECT ACCESS
Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 1QQCh. 13.1 - Prob. 2QQCh. 13.1 - Prob. 3QQCh. 13.1 - Prob. 4QQCh. 13.4 - Prob. 1QQCh. 13.4 - The D2e segment of the demand curve D2eD1 graph...Ch. 13.4 - Prob. 3QQCh. 13.4 - Prob. 4QQCh. 13.A - Prob. 1ADQCh. 13.A - Prob. 2ADQ
Ch. 13.A - Prob. 3ADQCh. 13.A - Prob. 4ADQCh. 13.A - Prob. 1ARQCh. 13.A - Prob. 2ARQCh. 13.A - Prob. 3ARQCh. 13.A - Prob. 1APCh. 13.A - Prob. 2APCh. 13 - Prob. 1DQCh. 13 - Prob. 2DQCh. 13 - Prob. 3DQCh. 13 - Prob. 4DQCh. 13 - Prob. 5DQCh. 13 - Prob. 6DQCh. 13 - Prob. 7DQCh. 13 - Prob. 8DQCh. 13 - Prob. 9DQCh. 13 - Prob. 10DQCh. 13 - Prob. 11DQCh. 13 - Prob. 12DQCh. 13 - Prob. 13DQCh. 13 - Prob. 1RQCh. 13 - Prob. 2RQCh. 13 - Prob. 3RQCh. 13 - Prob. 4RQCh. 13 - Prob. 5RQCh. 13 - Prob. 6RQCh. 13 - Prob. 7RQCh. 13 - Prob. 8RQCh. 13 - Prob. 1PCh. 13 - Prob. 2PCh. 13 - Prob. 3P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Newfoundland’s fishing industry has recently declined sharply due to overfish- ing, even though fishing companies were supposedly bound by a quota agree- ment. If all fishermen had abided by the agreement, yields could have been maintained at high levels. LO4 Model this situation as a prisoner’s dilemma in which the players are Company A and Company B and the strategies are to keep the quota and break the quota. Include appropriate payoffs in the matrix. Explain why overfishing is inevitable in the absence of effective enforcement of the quota agreement. Provide another environmental example of a prisoner’s dilemma. In many potential prisoner’s dilemmas, a way out of the dilemma for a would-be cooperator is to make reliable character judgments about the trustworthiness of potential partners. Explain why this solution is not avail- able in many situations involving degradation of the environment.arrow_forwardSuppose that Firm A and Firm B are independently deciding whether to sell at a low price or a high price. The payoff matrix below shows the profits per year for each company resulting from the two price options. Firm B High Price Firm B Low Price $5 million $2 million $3 million $1 million $4 million $5 million $2 million $3 million a. Does Firm A have a dominant strategy? O The dominant strategy for Firm A is a low price. O The dominant strategy for Firm A is a high price. O No, there is no dominant strategy for Firm A. b. Does Firm B have a dominant strategy? O The dominant strategy for Firm B is a high price. The dominant strategy for Firm B is a low price. O No, there is no dominant strategy for Firm B. c. What are the Nash equilibria in this game? Instructions: In order to receive full credit, you must make a selection for each option. For correct answer(s), click the box once to place a check mark. For incorrect answer(s), click the option twice to empty the box. 2 Firm A charges…arrow_forward4. The following payoff matrix shows the profit payoff to firms A and B from combinations of price strategies HI and LO. A НІ LOW B HI (6, 6) (16, -5) LOW (-7, 15) (0, 0) (a) In a one period game, what strategy would each firm follow, and why? Determine the equilibrium on the one-period game. (b) Now assume the game is infinite in length. Firm B goes HI in period 1 and continues with HI so long as A does as well. Firm A is deciding between HI and LO. Determine the range of discount rates for which HI is the better choice for Firm A.arrow_forward
- 5. The following represents the payoffs in a one period game in prices HI and LO. A HI LOW B HI (100, 100) (200,0) LOW (0, 200) (50, 50) (a) If A and B were playing this game only once, what strategy should A choose, and why? (b) A and B are playing the same game an infinite number of times and each has a discount rate of 50% (.50). Firm B adopts a trigger strategy and selects HI in the first round. What would be A's present value of profits from cooperation (HI)? What would be its present value from cheating (LO)? Would A choose to cooperate or cheat?arrow_forwardTeam 2 plays A Team 2 plays B Team 1 plays A 0, 24 10, 10 Team 1 plays B 4, 4 24, 0 Consider the infinitely repeated version of the game above. Which of the following is the smallest discount factor such that the grim trigger strategy under which team 1 plays A and team 2 plays B until a team deviates, after which team 1 plays B forever and team 2 plays A forever is a Nash Equilibrium? O 1/2 O3/4 O 1/100arrow_forward8. Suppose there are two firms (Fr and F2) producing identical product competing for 20 market share and each of which would like to dominate the other, if possible. They faced a choice between defending and cooperating. When either defends or bou cooperate, neither is able to dominate the other. Assuming these preferences are reflected in their profit pay-offs. If both the players choice to defend, their profit will be 1.500 each. When one Firm defends and the other cooperates their profit level will be 5.000 an 1.000 respectively. Similarly, when both cooperate they end up with profit level of 3.000 each. With this in mind: a. Represent the above game in normal form/strategic form. b. Identify the dominant strategy for both firms and the dominant strategy equilibrium. c. Is the above equilibrium Nash equilibrium? Is it Pareto efficient allocation? Why? d. Assuming the game is one-shoot game and Firm 1 moves first represent it in extended formarrow_forward
- Suppose O2 and Vodafone are the only two telecommunicationscompanies in UK. Both companies are considering whether ornot to stop offering unlimited data plans. Each company has twostrategies: stop or don’t stop. The first entry in the brackets is the payoffsof O2 and the second entry is the payoffs of Vodafone, both in $million.What will be the dominant strategies of O2 and Vodafone and what willbe the Nash equilibrium? Explain your answers.arrow_forwardQUESTION 8 Player 1 chooses between Up and Down. Player 2 observes this, then chooses between Up and Down herself. If both players choose the same action, they both get a payoff of 1. If they choose different actions, the player with Up gets 1 and the player with Down gets -1. How many (pure strategy) Nash equilibria are there in this game? O 3 O 4arrow_forward4. Consider a three-player bargaining, where the players are negotiating over a surplus of one unit of utility. The game begins with player 1 proposing a three-way split of the surplus. Then player 2 must decide whether to accept the proposal or to substitute for player 1's proposal his own alternative proposal. Finally, player 3 must decide whether to accept or reject current proposal (it is player 1's if player 2 accepts or player 2's if player 2 offer a new one). If he accepts, then the players obtain the specified shares of the surplus. If player 3 rejects, then the players each get 0. (a) Draw the extensive form game of this perfect-information game. (b) Determine the subgame perfect NE.arrow_forward
- O 100.10 O 60.20 O 75.15 O 80.30 D Question 26 Figure 1: Sequential Games) Use backwards induction to find the outcome of this game if Saudi Arabia goes first. Strategies for each player are choose a high or low level of oil output. Saudi Arabia Nigeria Nigeria high low 100 75 60 Saudi Arabia Nigeria 80 10 15 20 30arrow_forwardQ3. Explain the concept of mixed strategy and how to calculate the value of game. Also provide a suitable example for mixed strategy. Determine which of the following two-person zero-sum games are strictly determinable and fair. Give the optimum strategies for each player in the case of it being strictly determinable. I. I. a- Player A Player B B1 B2 B3 A1 8 4 A2 5 -1 b. I II II IV V I 4 -2 -2 3 1 A II 1 -1 III -6 -5 -2 -4 4 IV 3 1 -8arrow_forwardConsider a new card game between 2 players: Michael (player 1) and Phyllis (player 2) Michael is dealt two cards : O7 and 8. Phyllis is also dealt two cards: 09 and 10. Now, each of the players will play 1 card both at the same time. The payoff of Michael is 8 points if he plays a card of opposite color (red/black) than Phyllis, and otherwise his payoff is 10 points. The payoff of Phyllis is 1 points if the difference of the already played card numbers is smaller than 4, otherwise her payoff is 5 points. 1. Find the action sets of each player and the action profile of the game. 2. Represent the game in the Normal form. 3. Find the Best Responses for Michael. 4. Find the Best Responses for Phyllis. 5. Find all the Nash Equilibriums of the game (if any).arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education