Concept explainers
Case summary: A person GH owns and operates OGE, an audit entertainment establishment. The person GH signed a work order authorizing the company TCG to create a prototype of a customer chat system at a price of $64,697. Further, he signed an additional work order related to the installation of a customized firewall system with the same company at a price of $12,943. The payment of the money was to be done in monthly installments. Due to some problems, the work was not completed within the time anticipated. Also, the person GH was not able to make timely payments. The company TCG threatened the person GH to cease the work and filed a case regarding breach of contract. The person GH, instead of making further payments, wished to abandon the project.
To find: Whether the parties in the case have a valid UCC contract, the terms that are left open in the contract, and the way in which a court would deal with open terms.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 14 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
- True/False 10. If John remarks to Jane that her employment will be based upon granting him sexual favours,this type of contract would be considered____________________.A. Voidable as Jane may assert that Lee is suffering from substantial mental incapacity.B. Necessary in order for Jane to obtain her job.C. Void as it is an immoral contract that is against public policy.D. A covenant not to compete for other job opportunities.arrow_forward16. Why are restrictive covenant clauses controversial? They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms that restrict their future right to alter those same contracts They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms below the otherwise legislated minimum standards of work They are controversial because they seem to pit two legitimate interest against each other: the right of trade against the right of contractarrow_forward1. Life Company processes information furnished by others to transfer title to real estate from a seller to a buyer. In performing this task for a sale of land from Eren to Armin, the furnished information is mistaken. The contract between Eren and Armin that includes the mistake may be rescinded if the mistake concerns a. a detail on which the parties had a true “meeting of the minds.” b. a fact that is important and central to the contract. c. a third party, such as County Title. d. a term in the contract subject to only one reasonable interpretation.arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education