Company F contracted with company RB to install an awning system for outdoor seating coverage area. RB was disappointed with the execution of the work but did not gave any time to F to improve the error in the execution of the work. After two months of usage, the awning system was removed for the replacement of building’s siding and some defects were found in the welds. Both the parties differed in their opinion on damaged welds. RB paid F only $ 400 against the contracted price of $ 8161. To find: The right of RB to rescind the contract and obtain the paid price.

Question

Martha Simms is the plaintiff in a contract suit she has brought against Floral Supply, Inc., for its failure to deliver the green sponge Martha needed in building the floral designs she sells to exclusive home decorators. Martha had to obtain the sponge from another supplier and was late on seven deliveries. One of Martha’s customers has been called by Martha’s lawyer as a witness and is now on the witness stand, testifying about Martha’s late performance and the penalty she charged. The lawyer for Floral Supply knows that Martha’s customer frequently waives penalties for good suppliers. Provide a paragraph with more than five sentences (i.e., in the section for “Purport”) that interprets the theme of the case, based on concepts

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 14, Problem 4BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Company F contracted with company RB to install an awning system for outdoor seating coverage area. RB was disappointed with the execution of the work but did not gave any time to F to improve the error in the execution of the work. After two months of usage, the awning system was removed for the replacement of building’s siding and some defects were found in the welds. Both the parties differed in their opinion on damaged welds. RB paid F only $400 against the contracted price of $8161.

To find: The right of RB to rescind the contract and obtain the paid price.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: F contracted with RB to install an awning system for outdoor seating coverage area. RB was disappointed with the execution of the work but did not gave any time to F to improve the error in the execution of the work. After two months of usage, the awning system was removed for the replacement of building’s siding and some defects were found in the welds. Both the parties differed in their opinion on damaged welds. RB paid F only $400 against the contracted price of $8161.

To find: F’s right to recover the differences between the paid and the contracted price.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Martha Simms is the plaintiff in a contract suit she has brought against Floral Supply, Inc., for its failure to deliver the green sponge Martha needed in building the floral designs she sells to exclusive home decorators. Martha had to obtain the sponge from another supplier and was late on seven deliveries. One of Martha’s customers has been called by Martha’s lawyer as a witness and is now on the witness stand, testifying about Martha’s late performance and the penalty she charged. The lawyer for Floral Supply knows that Martha’s customer frequently waives penalties for good suppliers. Provide a paragraph with more than five sentences (i.e., in the section for “Purport”) that interprets the theme of the case, based on concepts

Martha Simms is the plaintiff in a contract suit she has brought against Floral Supply, Inc., for its failure to deliver the green sponge Martha needed in building the floral designs she sells to exclusive home decorators. Martha had to obtain the sponge from another supplier and was late on seven deliveries. One of Martha’s customers has been called by Martha’s lawyer as a witness and is now on the witness stand, testifying about Martha’s late performance and the penalty she charged. The lawyer for Floral Supply knows that Martha’s customer frequently waives penalties for good suppliers. 1. In what legal tribunal the Simm’s case is tried? 2.To which jurisdiction does the trial of the Simm’s case belong?

At least six months before the Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta, Georgia, a group made up of Stafford Fontenot, Steve Turner, Mike Montelaro, Joe Sokol, and Doug Brinsmade agreed to sell Cajun food at the games and began making preparations. On May 19, the group (calling themselves Prairie Cajun Seafood Catering of Louisiana) applied for a business license with the county health department. Ted Norris sold members of the group a mobile kitchen in return for an $8,000 check drawn on the “Prairie Cajun Sea-food Catering of Louisiana” account and two promissory notes, one for $12,000 and the other for $20,000. The notes, which were dated June 12, listed only Fontenot “d/b/a Prairie Cajun Seafood” as the maker (d/b/a is an abbreviation for “doing business as”). On July 31, Fontenot and his friends signed a partnership agreement, which listed specific percentages of profits and losses. They drove the mobile kitchen to Atlanta, but business was disastrous. When the notes were not paid, Norris…