EBK MINDTAP FOR KELLER'S STATISTICS FOR
11th Edition
ISBN: 9780357110676
Author: KELLER
Publisher: VST
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14.A, Problem 9E
To determine
Compute the one way
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Allegiant Airlines is considering an overbooking policy for one of its flights. The airplane has 50 seats, but Allegiant is considering accepting more reservations than seats because sometimes passengers do not show up for their flights, resulting in empty seats. The PassengerAppearance worksheet in the file Overbooking contains data on 1,000 passengers showing whether or not they showed up for their respective flights.
In addition, Allegiant has conducted a field experiment to gauge the demand for reservations for the current flight. During this experiment, they did not limit the number of reservations for the flight to observe the uncensored demand. The following table summarizes the result of the field experiment.
No. of Reservations Demanded
Probability
48
0.05
49
0.05
50
0.15
51
0.30
52
0.25
53
0.10
54
0.10
Suppose Allegiant receives a marginal profit of $108 for each passenger who books a reservation (regardless of whether they show up). In addition, suppose…
A salesman for a new manufacturer of cellular phones claims not only that they cost the retailer less but also that the percentage of defective cellular phones found among his products, ( p1 ), will be no higher than the percentage of defectives found in a competitor's line, ( p2 ). To test this statement, the retailer took a random sample of 185 of the salesman's cellular phones and 150 of the competitor's cellular phones. The retailer found that 22 of the salesman's cellular phones and 11 of the competitor's cellular phones were defective. Does the retailer have enough evidence to reject the salesman's claim? Use a significance level of α=0.05 for the test.
Step 1 of 6 : State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.
A salesman for a new manufacturer of cellular phones claims not only that they cost the retailer less but also that the percentage of defective cellular phones found among his products, ( p1 ), will be no higher than the percentage of defectives found in a competitor's line, ( p2 ). To test this statement, the retailer took a random sample of 130 of the salesman's cellular phones and 110 of the competitor's cellular phones. The retailer found that 10 of the salesman's cellular phones and 5 of the competitor's cellular phones were defective. Does the retailer have enough evidence to reject the salesman's claim? Use a significance level of α=0.05 for the test. Step 5 of 6 : Determine the decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis H0 . Round the numerical portion of your answer to three decimal places.
Chapter 14 Solutions
EBK MINDTAP FOR KELLER'S STATISTICS FOR
Ch. 14.1 - Prob. 1ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 2ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 3ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 4ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 5ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 6ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 7ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 8ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 9ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 10E
Ch. 14.1 - Prob. 11ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 12ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 13ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 14ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 15ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 16ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 17ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 18ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 19ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 20ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 21ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 22ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 23ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 24ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 25ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 26ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 27ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 28ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 29ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 30ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 31ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 32ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 33ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 34ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 35ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 36ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 37ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 38ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 39ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 40ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 41ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 42ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 43ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 44ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 45ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 46ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 47ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 48ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 49ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 50ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 51ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 52ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 53ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 54ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 55ECh. 14.1 - Prob. 56ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 57ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 58ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 59ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 60ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 61ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 62ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 63ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 64ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 65ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 66ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 67ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 68ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 69ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 70ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 71ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 72ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 73ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 74ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 75ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 76ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 77ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 78ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 79ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 80ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 81ECh. 14.2 - Prob. 82ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 83ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 84ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 85ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 86ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 87ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 88ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 89ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 90ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 91ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 92ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 93ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 94ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 95ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 96ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 97ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 98ECh. 14.4 - Prob. 99ECh. 14.5 - Prob. 100ECh. 14.5 - Prob. 101ECh. 14.5 - Prob. 102ECh. 14.5 - Prob. 103ECh. 14.5 - Prob. 104ECh. 14.5 - Prob. 105ECh. 14.5 - Prob. 106ECh. 14.5 - Prob. 107ECh. 14.5 - Prob. 108ECh. 14.5 - Prob. 109ECh. 14.6 - Prob. 110ECh. 14.6 - Prob. 111ECh. 14.6 - Prob. 112ECh. 14.A - Prob. 1ECh. 14.A - Prob. 2ECh. 14.A - Prob. 3ECh. 14.A - Prob. 4ECh. 14.A - Prob. 5ECh. 14.A - Prob. 6ECh. 14.A - Prob. 7ECh. 14.A - Prob. 8ECh. 14.A - Prob. 9ECh. 14.A - Prob. 10ECh. 14.A - Prob. 11ECh. 14.A - Prob. 12ECh. 14.A - Prob. 13ECh. 14.A - Prob. 14ECh. 14.A - Prob. 15ECh. 14.A - Prob. 16ECh. 14.A - Prob. 17ECh. 14.A - Prob. 18ECh. 14.A - Prob. 19ECh. 14.A - Prob. 20ECh. 14.A - Prob. 21ECh. 14.A - Prob. 22ECh. 14.A - Prob. 23ECh. 14.A - Prob. 24ECh. 14.A - Prob. 25ECh. 14.A - Prob. 26ECh. 14.A - Prob. 27ECh. 14.A - Prob. 28ECh. 14.A - Prob. 29ECh. 14.A - Prob. 30ECh. 14.A - Prob. 31ECh. 14.A - Prob. 32ECh. 14.A - Prob. 33ECh. 14.A - Prob. 34ECh. 14.A - Prob. 35ECh. 14.A - Prob. 36ECh. 14.A - Prob. 37ECh. 14.A - Prob. 38ECh. 14.A - Prob. 39ECh. 14.A - Prob. 40ECh. 14.A - Prob. 41ECh. 14.A - Prob. 42ECh. 14 - Prob. 113CECh. 14 - Prob. 114CECh. 14 - Prob. 115CECh. 14 - Prob. 116CECh. 14 - Prob. 117CECh. 14 - Prob. 118CECh. 14 - Prob. 119CECh. 14 - Prob. 120CECh. 14 - Prob. 121CECh. 14 - Prob. 122CECh. 14 - Prob. 123CECh. 14 - Prob. 124CECh. 14 - Prob. 125CECh. 14 - Prob. 126CECh. 14 - Prob. 127CECh. 14 - Prob. 128CECh. 14 - Prob. 129CECh. 14 - Prob. 130CECh. 14 - Prob. 131CECh. 14 - Prob. 132CECh. 14 - Prob. 133CECh. 14 - Prob. 134CECh. 14 - Prob. 135CECh. 14 - Prob. 136CECh. 14 - Prob. 137CECh. 14 - Prob. 138CECh. 14 - Prob. 139CECh. 14 - Prob. 140CECh. 14 - Prob. 141CECh. 14 - Prob. 142CECh. 14 - Prob. 143CECh. 14 - Prob. 144CECh. 14 - Prob. 145CECh. 14 - Prob. 146CE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- A researcher investigated whether a father's level of optimism was predictive of his son's optimism as a young adult. Twenty (20) fathers and sons who agreed to participate in the study were administered a scale measuring their current level of optimism (the scale ranged from 10 to 50), with higher scores indicating greater optimism.arrow_forwardResearchers conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the association between dietary supplements and cognitive ability among children. A total of 500 children age 12-17 years who take an omega-3 fatty acid supplement are compared with 500 children age 12-17 years who do not take an omega-3 fatty acid supplement. Researchers follow the children for 2 years. During this time, 300 children who take the supplement earn what is classified as a “high” score on a cognitive test while 200 children who do not take the supplement earn what is classified as a “high” score on the same cognitive test. Show calculations. a) Construct a 2x2 table from the information presented above b) The risk difference is:arrow_forwardThe Chi-Squared Test - X² Choco-Zuties, and the other ad was for a new healthy snack called Apple-Zuties. Product advertisers studied the effects of television ads on children's choices for two new snacks. The advertisers used two 30-second television ads in an experiment. One ad was for a new sugary snack called program, the children were offered a choice between the two snacks. The table below summarizes their choices. individually watched a 30-minute television program that was interrupted for 5 minutes of advertising. After the For the experiment, 75 children were randomly assigned to one of three groups, A, B, or C. Each child Number Who Chose Choco-Zuties 21 13 22 Group A B с Kristin Trehame 11-30-20 Chapter 11 Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables Type of Ad Choco-Zuties only Apple-Zuties only Neither Number Who Chose Apple-Zuties 4 12 x²=(obs-exp)² exp Do the data provide convincing statistical evidence that there is an association between type of ad and…arrow_forward
- Question: In two large populations, there are 30 and 25 per cent respectively of blue-eyed people. Is this difference likely to be hidden in samples of 1,200 and 900 respectively from the two populations ?arrow_forwardBenson Manufacturing is considering ordering electronic components from three different suppliers. The suppliers may differ in terms of quality in that the proportion or percentage of defective components may differ among the suppliers. To evaluate the proportion of defective components for the suppliers, Benson has requested a sample shipment of 500 components from each supplier. The number of defective components and the number of good components found in each shipment are as follows. Supplier Component Defective 17 22 42 Good 483 478 458 (a) Formulate the hypotheses that can be used to test for equal proportions of defective components provided by the three suppliers. OH PA PB = Pc 0 H: All population proportions are not equal. OH PA = P₁ = Pc H: Not all population proportions are equal. OH: All population proportions are not equal. H₂PAP=Pc OH,: Not all population proportions are equal. H₂: PA=PB = Pc (b) Using a 0.05 level of significance, conduct the hypothesis test. Find the…arrow_forwardNote: If your answer does not exactly match the correct choice, it is due to rounding of intermediate calculations. To avoid the discrepancy, do your calculations in Excel without rounding. A life insurance company wishes to examine the relationship between the amount of life insurance held by a family and family income. From a random sample of households, the company collected the accompanying data. The data are in units of thousands of dollars. INSUR INCOME 97 38 141 29 y = X = Let INSUR 280 75 %3D INCOME 303 81 453 137 357 77 199 43 251 53 807 184 147 45 272 70 537 128 527 117 245 55 483 116 673 204 194 46 154 51 163 48 2 The denominator of the slope coefficient formula for the estimated regression equation is: 108,450.87 280 69 a 507 140 b 105,805.73 464 136 103,225.10 321 71 d 100,707.41 873 206 476 144 574 111 251 65 497 130 826 171 133 32 259 82 281 73 446 146 332 77 219 48 208 55 180 48 169 42 273 69 502 127 547 126 281 80 428 143 370 77 221 49 214 51arrow_forward
- Celebrity endorsement has become a popular choice in advertising due to the its originality and the celebrity’s attractiveness that make a big impact on brand awareness and customer behavior. This study analyzes the effect of celebrity endorsement on customer’s attitude toward brand as well as the effect of customer’s attitude toward brand on customer’s purchase intention in Vietnam. A survey was conducted with 306 individuals in Vietnam. After conducting the explanatory factor analysis (EFA), and multi-variable regression analysis, results indicate that customer’s attitude toward brand is positively affected by 03 factors: celebrity match-up congruence with the brand/product, celebrity trustworthiness, and celebrity expertise. Attitude toward brand also has a positive impact on customer’s purchase intention. Based on the scenario presented, answer the following questions: A) Find out Independent, Dependent, Moderating, and Mediating Variables and elaborate…arrow_forwardA government study found that people who eat chocolate frequently weighless than people who don’t. Researchers questioned 1000 individuals fromCalifornia between the ages of 20 and 85 about their eating habits, andmeasured their weight and height. On average, participants ate chocolatetwice a week and had a body mass index (BMI) of 28. There was anobserved difference of five to seven pounds in weight between those whoate chocolate five times a week and those who did not eat any chocolate atall, with the chocolate eaters weighing less on average. Frequent chocolateeaters also consumed more calories, on average, than people who consumedless chocolate. Based on this summary, would you recommend thatAmerican’s who do not presently eat chocolate, consider eating chocolateup to five times a week if they want to lose weight? Why or why not?Explain.arrow_forwardA group of health professionals produced a cholesterol drug. To measure the effectiveness of this drug they implemented a program that offered free drugs to people to decrease their cholesterol level. Health professionals also collected a sample of people, who did not have the drug, to act as a control group. Health professionals then measured cholesterol level of all individuals in year 1, before any cholesterol drug were given out, and then measured the same group of individuals again in year 2 after the cholesterol drugs had been administered. Consider the following model to evaluate the effectiveness of the drug on people's cholesterol level: cholie = Bo + 8od2, + B1drugit + Vịt chol= cholestrol of individual i, in year t d2;= binary variable equal to 1 if the time period is year 2, and 0 otherwise drug= binary variable equal to 1 if individual i took the drug in year t, and 0 otherwise V= composite error consisting of the unobserved, time-constant effect (a;) and the idiosyncratic…arrow_forward
- Textbook authors must be careful that the reading level of their book is appropriate for the target audience. Some methods of assessing reading level require estimating the average word length. We've randomly chosen 20 words from a randomly selected page in Intro Stats and counted the number of letters in each word: 5, 5, 2, 11, 3, 5, 6, 8, 5, 4, 7, 2, 9, 4, 8, 10, 4, 7, 6, 9 Suppose that our editor was hoping that the book would have a mean word length of 6.8 letters. Does this sample indicate that the authors failed to meet this goal? With a significance level of 0.05, test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion. (i.e state the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses, calculate the test statistic, conclude and interpret it).arrow_forwardBirth weight and smoking during pregnancy,Birthweight,Smoker3771,03140,03317,04210,03076,03771,03487,03487,01559,03630,03572,03260,03430,04224,02955,03912,03196,03459,03459,03430,02750,03686,03260,03969,03430,03629,02863,02830,03105,02948,03175,04309,03232,03487,02807,03820,03941,02211,03204,03657,13487,12495,14253,13147,13600,13005,12552,13147,14593,13430,11985,13317,13487,13884,13289,13470,12665,13090,12835,11843,14451,12863,1900,12353,13317,12850,13560,13080,12325,13119,13175,13313,13374,12750,12835,13345,12637,13742,13119,13345,13175,12013,13232,13286,13360,13402,12948,12580,13260,13686,12750,12977,12580,14082,12807,12381,13175,13714,13544,13544,1arrow_forwardYou have been hired as a consultant by building contractor, who have been sued by the owners' representatives of a large condominium project for shoddy construction work. In order to assess the damages for the various units, the owners' association sent out a letter to owners and asked if people were willing to make their units available for destructive testing. Destructive testing was conducted in some of these units as a result of the responses. Based on the tests, the owners' association inferred the damage over the entire condo complex. Do you think that the inference is valid in this case? a). No, the inference is not valid. It is an example of sample selection bias because owners whose units were relatively more damaged were more likely to make theor units available for destructive testing. b). No, the inference is not valid because not all units were tested. c). Yes, the inference is valid. The study will correctly determine the incidence of damages in the concominium…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education