Microeconomics (9th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9780134184890
Author: PINDYCK
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 15, Problem 8RQ
To determine
The diversifiable and non-diversifiable risk and the risk premium
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Show, using equations or a diagram, that an expected utility maximizer requires a higher return for a riskier asset
What is the expected return from an investment if there is a 20 percent chance of a 4 percent return, a 40 percent chance of a 8 percent return, and a 40 percent chance of a 12 percent return
Studies have concluded that a college degree is a very good investment. Suppose that a college graduate earns about 75% more money per hour than a high-school graduate. If the lifetime earnings of a high-school graduate average $1,200,000, what is the expected value of earning a college degree?
Chapter 15 Solutions
Microeconomics (9th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Find the expected value assuming the risk factor is 30 % and the interest rate is 15%, if you will receive $20,000 one year from today. Find the expected value assuming the risk factor is 30 % and the interest rate is 15%, if you will receive $20,000 two years from today.arrow_forwardYou are considering a $500,000 investment in the fast-food industry and have narrowed your choice to either a McDonald’s or a Penn Station East Coast Subs franchise. McDonald’s indicates that, based on the location where you are proposing to open a new restaurant, there is a 25 percent probability that aggregate 10-year profits (net of the initial investment) will be $16 million, a 50 percent probability that profits will be $8 million, and a 25 percent probability that profits will be −$1.6 million. The aggregate 10-year profit projections (net of the initial investment) for a Penn Station East Coast Subs franchise is $48 million with a 2.5 percent probability, $8 million with a 95 percent probability, and −$48 million with a 2.5 percent probability. Considering both the risk and expected profitability of these two investment opportunities, which is the better investment? Explain carefully.arrow_forwardSuppose your utility function for money is a square-root function of its value in US dollars. So, for instance, $400 is worth 20 utils for you, $961 is worth 31 utils for you, and $62.5K is worth 250 utils for you. Now, let’s say your annual salary is $90K, although there is a small risk (p = 0.05) that something catastrophic will happen and reduce your income for the year to $14.4K. An insurance company comes along and offers to insure you against the loss of your salary. The cost of the insurance is $4,736. If you buy the policy and catastrophe strikes, the insurance company will pay out the $75,600 that you would otherwise have lost. From the standpoint of maximizing expected utility, would buying this insurance be a good deal for you? What would be the insurance company’s expected monetary value of selling you the policy?arrow_forward
- Consider two investors A and B.If the Certainty-Equivalent end-of-period wealth of A is less than the Certainty-Equivalent end-of-period wealth of B for the same portfolio choice,then A. Risk aversion of A > Risk aversion of B B. Risk aversion of A = Risk aversion of B C. Risk aversion of A< Risk aversion of B D. Not enough Information Justify your choice in a sentence or two：arrow_forwardA risk-averse manager is considering a project that will cost £100. There is a 10 percent chance the project will generate revenues of £100, an 80 percent chance it will yield revenues of £50, and a 10 percent chance it will yield revenues of £500. Should the manager adopt the project? Explain. What will a risk-neutral and risk-loving manager do in the same situation?arrow_forwardUnsystematic risk is not compensated in equilibrium because it can be eliminated for free through diversification. Select one: True Falsearrow_forward
- A risk-averse manager is considering two projects. The first project involves expanding the market for bologna; the second involves expanding the market for caviar. There is a 10 percent chance of a recession and a 90 percent chance of an economic boom. During a boom, the bologna project will lose $10,000, whereas the caviar project will earn $20,000. During a recession, the bologna project will earn $12,000 and the caviar project will lose $8,000. If the alternative is earning $3,000 on a safe asset (say, a Treasury bill), what should the manager do? Why?arrow_forwardStephanie Carter has been gifted a sum of $50,000 by her grandparents on completing her graduation successfully. She is a fresh finance graduate and is excited to invest some money in the capital market, for which she intends to use the gifted sum of $50,000. However, instead of committing this money to the market immediately, she decides to wait for some time, work in the field and acquire some experience before proceeding with her intended investment. She thus contemplates an extremely conservative investment in a portfolio of stocks and bonds, at the start of year 5 from now. For now, she will leave the $50,000 in a fixed deposit with the bank which promises an interest rate of 6% per annum. She will require a return of at least 9% on her stock investments and 4% on bond investments. Stephanie would have to pay 25% taxes on any interest income. Dividends will be tax-free. Stephanie’s research has allowed her to narrow down on the following investment candidates: Stocks:…arrow_forwardExplain why the variance of an investment is a useful measure of the risk associated with itarrow_forward
- What is the difference if any between an individual gambling at a casino and gambling by buying a stock? What is the difference for society? For an individual, gambling at a casino or by buying a stock A. is the same because they have the same expected values. B. is the same insofar that both involve uncertain outcomes C. different because the expected value of gambling in a casino is higher. 2. For society, gambling at a casino or by buying a stock A. is the same because neither redistribute income. B. is different because buying a stock more directly provides capital for companies to make productive investments. C. is the same because both have no effect on the budget deficit.arrow_forwardwhat happens when expected profit equal total investmentarrow_forwardYou are a risk-averse investor with a CRRA utility function. You are faced with the decision to invest your total wealth W of £1,000,000 into a riskless asset which generates a return of 5% or into a risky asset which either generates a return of 20% or a loss of −4% with equal probability. Find the optimal investment allocation with a coefficient of relative risk aversion η=2, and comment on your results.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...
Economics
ISBN:9781337091985
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning