Mathematical Ideas (13th Edition) - Standalone book
13th Edition
ISBN: 9780321977076
Author: Charles D. Miller, Vern E. Heeren, John Hornsby, Christopher Heeren
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 15.2, Problem 20E
Irrelevant Alternatives in a Hare Method Election For the profile of voters in Exercise 13(a), Atlanta is selected by the Hare method in the preliminary non-binding decision.
(a) If the losing city, Chicago, withdraws after the nonbinding vote, which city wins the official vote? Use the voter profile in Exercise 13(a) with Chicago deleted for the official Hare method election.
(b) Does the Hare method violate the irrelevant alternatives criterion in this selection process?
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
5. A vote is to be taken among the residents of a town and the surrounding county to determine whether a proposed chemical plant should be constructed. The construction site is within the town limits, and for this reason many voters in the county believe that the proposal will pass because of the large proportion of town voters who favor the construction. To determine if there is a significant difference in the proportions of town voters and county voters favoring the proposal, a poll is taken. If 120 of 200 town voters favor the proposal and 240 of 500 county residents favor it, would you agree that the proportion of town voters favoring the proposal is higher than the proportion of county voters? Use an α = 0.05 level of significance.
Tayshia is participating in an experiment on intergroup attitudes. At the beginning of the experiment, the experimenter flips a coin to assign Tayshia to Group A or Group B. According to the research on the minimal groups paradigm, will Tayshia show a preference people in the same group?
-Yes, because Group A and Group B are meaningful groups competing for resources.
-Yes, because even arbitrary groups can elicit intergroup bias.
-No, because groups must have a history of violence and oppression to produce intergroup bias.
-No, because Tayshia realizes that the groups are completely random.
An election resulted in Candidate A winning, with Candidate B coming in a close second, and candidate C being a distant third.If in a head-to-head comparison a majority of people prefer B to A or C, which is the primary fairness criterion violated in this election?
Condorcet Criterion
Monotonicity Criterion
Majority Criterion
Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Criterion
Chapter 15 Solutions
Mathematical Ideas (13th Edition) - Standalone book
Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by the Plurality Method A...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by the Plurality Method A...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by Alternative Methods For...Ch. 15.1 - Choosing a Poster Dog by Alternative MethodsFor...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...Ch. 15.1 - Observing the Effect of the Number of Candidates...
Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Applying Four Voting Methods to a Voter Profile...Ch. 15.1 - Holding a Runoff Election One common solution to...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 21ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 26ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 27ECh. 15.1 - The Pairwise Comparison Method Each table...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 29ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 30ECh. 15.1 - The Borda Method Each table represents a Borda...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 32ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 33ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 34ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 35ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 36ECh. 15.1 - The Coombs Method The Coombs method of voting is a...Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 38ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 39ECh. 15.1 - Prob. 40ECh. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Majority Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Identifying Violations of the Condorcet Criterion...Ch. 15.2 - Prob. 9ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 10ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 11ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 12ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 13ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 14ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 15ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 16ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 17ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 18ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 19ECh. 15.2 - Irrelevant Alternatives in a Hare Method Election...Ch. 15.2 - 21. Explain why a violation of the majority...Ch. 15.2 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 26ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 27ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 28ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 29ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 30ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 31ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 32ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 33ECh. 15.2 - Prob. 34ECh. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Find each quantity (to the nearest whole number)...Ch. 15.3 - Solve each problem.
5. New Trees for Wisconsin...Ch. 15.3 - Apportioning Computers to Schools Enrollments for...Ch. 15.3 - Assigning Faculty to Courses The English...Ch. 15.3 - 8. Apportioning Sailboats to Resorts The number of...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 9ECh. 15.3 - 10. Show that the Webster method apportionment of...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 11ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 12ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 13ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 14ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 15ECh. 15.3 - Find the Huntington-Hill cutoff point for rounding...Ch. 15.3 - Creating a Profile of School Bus Riders Create a...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 18ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 19ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.3 - The standard quotas rounded up to the nearest...Ch. 15.3 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.3 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Quota Rule Violations with the Jefferson Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Alabama Paradox with the Hamilton Method In each...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Population Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - New States Paradox with the Hamilton Method In...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Violations of the Quota Rule? For each...Ch. 15.4 - Prob. 20ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 21ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 22ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 23ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 24ECh. 15.4 - Prob. 25ECh. 15.4 - 26. The Jefferson and Adams methods are both...Ch. 15 - How many different complete rankings are possible...Ch. 15 - Prob. 2TCh. 15 - Prob. 3TCh. 15 - Prob. 4TCh. 15 - Prob. 5TCh. 15 - Why is the irrelevant alternatives criterion an...Ch. 15 - Prob. 7TCh. 15 - Prob. 8TCh. 15 - Prob. 9TCh. 15 - Prob. 10TCh. 15 - Prob. 11TCh. 15 - Prob. 12TCh. 15 - Prob. 13TCh. 15 - Prob. 14TCh. 15 - Prob. 15TCh. 15 - Prob. 16TCh. 15 - Prob. 17TCh. 15 - Prob. 18TCh. 15 - Prob. 19TCh. 15 - Prob. 20TCh. 15 - Prob. 21TCh. 15 - Prob. 22TCh. 15 - Prob. 23TCh. 15 - Prob. 24TCh. 15 - Prob. 25TCh. 15 - One hundred seats are to be apportioned to 4...Ch. 15 - Prob. 27TCh. 15 - Prob. 28TCh. 15 - Prob. 29TCh. 15 - Explain the Alabama paradox.Ch. 15 - Prob. 31TCh. 15 - Prob. 32T
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Economist Arthur Laffer suggests that beyond a certain point, high tax rates depress the economy so much that they actually reduce tax revenues. He proposed tax reductions as a means of stimulating the economy and, as a result, increase tax revenues. In the mid 1990’s Time magazine reported that 30% of the US Congress supported a tax cut as a means of stimulating the economy and increasing tax revenues. Suppose at that time 5 members of congress were randomly selected for an interview and asked whether they supported a tax cut to stimulate the economy. 1.2) Find the probability that at least three of the five members of congress who were interviewed were in favour of a tax cut (rounded off to four decimals).arrow_forwardCandidates for a school board election have put forth four proposals (i.e., Proposal A, Proposal B, Proposal C, Proposal D) regarding plans for a new school. A researcher wants to examine if there is a preference among the four plans among a sample of residents. What is the null hypothesis for this hypothesis test?arrow_forwardThe mayor of a town wants to propose a plan for the annexation of a new community. The mayor would like to know if the majority of the residents favor the annexation before calling a formal referendum on the topic. A research company was hired to survey a sample of residents to determine their views on the annexation. The researchers randomly selected 850 residents and found that 50.8% favored the annexation. Determine if there is sufficient evidence to conclude that a majority of residents favor the annexation of the new community at the 1% level of significance. Step 5 of 5: Draw a conclusion and interpret the decision.arrow_forward
- 2. At a high school, the cafeteria staff provides optional comment cards to students eating in the cafeteria. Students who wish to make a comment can obtain and fill out a comment card and return it to a drop box in the front office. At the end of the semester, the staff analyzes the responses and finds that 72% of the students who filled out a comment card recommend major changes to the food selection. What conclusions can the cafeteria staff draw from these responses? (A) Since all of the students had an opportunity to respond, this is evidence that a majority of all the students supports major changes. (B) The cafeteria staff should not use the results to draw any conclusions since some students may not have filled out a comment card, which is nonresponse. (C) If the students recorded their grade level with their response, the staff could make the original sample a stratified sample and use the responses to learn what proportion of each grade recommends major changes to food…arrow_forwardA vote is to be taken among the residents of a town and the surrounding county to determine whether a proposed chemical plant should be constructed. The construction site is within the town limits, and for this reason many voters in the county believe that the proposal will pass because of the large proportion of town voters who favor the construction. To determine if there is a significant difference in the proportions of town voters and county voters favoring the proposal, a poll is taken. If 120 out of 200 town voters favor the proposal and 240 out of 500 county voters favor it, would you agree that the proportion of town voters favoring the proposal is higher than the proportion of county voters? Use an alpha = 0.01 level of significance.arrow_forwardA company studies the product preferences of 20,000 consumers. It was found that each of the products A, B and C was liked by 7500, 6500 and 5500 respectively and all the products were liked by 1230. Products A and B were liked by 2500, products A and C were liked by 2300 and products B and C were liked by 2530. Prove that the study results are not correct.arrow_forward
- A pet food company has a business objective of expanding its product line beyond its current kidney- and shrimp-based cat foods. The company developed two new products, one based on chicken liver and the other based on salmon. The company conducted an experiment to compare the two new products with its two existing ones, as well as a generic beef-based product sold in a supermarket chain. For the experiment, a sample of 50 cats from the population at a local animal shelter was selected. Ten cats were randomly assigned to each of the five products being tested. Each of the cats was then presented with 3 ounces of the selected food in a dish at feeding time. The researchers defined the variable to be measured as the number of ounces of food that the cat consumed within a 10-minute time interval that began when the filled dish was presented. The results of this experiment are summarized in the following table: Kidney Shrimp Chicken Liver Salmon Beef 2.37 2.26…arrow_forward[11] After carrying out Kruskal Wallis test, the voting preferences in terms of ranked presidentiable candidates from Albay, Mindoro and Palawan were found to be statistically different. Is there a need to do a post-hoc test for this? Explain. Yes: No:arrow_forwardAn election resulted in Brown winning, with Kelly coming in a close second, and candidate Whitmore being a distant third. If in a head-to-head comparison a majority of people prefer Kelly to Brown or Whitmore, which is the primary fairness criterion violated in this election? Condorcet Criterion Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA) Criterion Majority Criterion No fairness criteria are violated Monotonicity Criterionarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications ( 8th I...MathISBN:9781259676512Author:Kenneth H RosenPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Mathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activiti...MathISBN:9780134392790Author:Beckmann, SybillaPublisher:PEARSON
Thinking Mathematically (7th Edition)MathISBN:9780134683713Author:Robert F. BlitzerPublisher:PEARSON
Discrete Mathematics With ApplicationsMathISBN:9781337694193Author:EPP, Susanna S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Pathways To Math Literacy (looseleaf)MathISBN:9781259985607Author:David Sobecki Professor, Brian A. MercerPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications ( 8th I...
Math
ISBN:9781259676512
Author:Kenneth H Rosen
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Mathematics for Elementary Teachers with Activiti...
Math
ISBN:9780134392790
Author:Beckmann, Sybilla
Publisher:PEARSON
Thinking Mathematically (7th Edition)
Math
ISBN:9780134683713
Author:Robert F. Blitzer
Publisher:PEARSON
Discrete Mathematics With Applications
Math
ISBN:9781337694193
Author:EPP, Susanna S.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Pathways To Math Literacy (looseleaf)
Math
ISBN:9781259985607
Author:David Sobecki Professor, Brian A. Mercer
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Chi Square test; Author: Vectors Academy;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f53nXHoMXx4;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY