(a):
Benefit and cost.
(a):
Explanation of Solution
User’s benefits are prevention from the highway corrosion, rust on vehicle, corrosion to utility lines and damages to water supplies and damages to vegetation and soil surrounding areas.
The sponsor’s costs are paying a higher tax and unknown environmental damages that causes due to the usage of CMA.
(b):
Salt damages.
(b):
Explanation of Solution
The damage is calculated by following the given procedure. The state gives exclusive rights to the CMA for a selected area and road salt for another area tor a particular period of time. After that particular time period, It is evaluated the vegetation yield, road salt yield and compared both the result. The difference int eh value is quantified in terms of monetary value.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
Contemporary Engineering Economics (6th Edition)
- Distinguish between a carbon-tax and a cap-andtrade strategy for reducing carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases (that are believed by many scientists to be causing global warming). Which of the two strategies do you think would have the most political support in an election in your home state? Explain your thinking.arrow_forwardThe government introduces a subsidy scheme where renewable generators receive a subsidy payment for each MWh unit of their generation output (subsidy is in the form of $/MWh). This policy may have consequences for the prices, the producer surplus, and the energy-mix at the wholesale market in Australia. Everything else being equal, which outcomes are possible for a given trading (dispatch) period as a result of the introduction of the renewable energy subsidy? Group of answer choices It may not change the electricity wholesale price being set at the NEM in a given trading interval. It may increase the proportion of renewable energy being generated in a given trading interval. It may decrease the proportion of renewable energy being generated in a given trading interval. It may not change the proportion of renewable energy being generated in a given trading interval. It may increase the producers’ surplus for coal generators in a given trading interval. It will increase the…arrow_forwardAbout 35,000 general aviation multiengine airplanes are licensed to operate in the United States. If an additional $1,000-per-year tax was levied on each plane to raise general revenue, economic thinking suggests the A) annual revenue from this tax would be less than $35,000,000.B) number of airplanes would increase dramatically.C) annual revenue from this tax would be more than $35,000,000.D) annual revenue from this tax would be $35,000,000.arrow_forward
- John is planning to travel to a country where there is some risk of contracting yellow fever. The direct market price for the medication that prevents yellow fever is $125. It would take him 2 hours to visit his doctor and get the prescription filled. The opportunity cost of his time is $25/hour. If he contracts yellow fever we assume that he will be sick and not able to work full days for two weeks. Under these conditions, let's assume he can work half days and has no vacation or sick time to use. His company will not pay him when he is sick and not working. His out of pocket expenses for medication, doctors’ visits, and lab tests to treat the yellow fever will be $500. His normal salary is $1,000 per week. John believes that his chance of getting yellow fever without preventative medicine is about 20%. His chance of getting yellow fever with the medication is 0%. There is no pain and suffering to be considered in this problem. What is the maximum price that John would pay…arrow_forwardConsider a competitive market in which the MPB = 180 – 2q and the MSC = q. In this market, however, there is a positive consumption externality of $60 per unit consumed. What is the efficient level of output in this market? A. 60 B. 80 C. 70 D. 90 E. 100arrow_forwardIf demand and supply of Chinese coal areQd = 60 − 0.5P Qs = −2 + 2P Then, Calculate the dead weight loss of the subsidy, if the subsidy cost is 47.6arrow_forward
- Suppose that a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is MAC = 16 - 2E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, then its marginal abatement cost function will become MAC = 8 - E. If the government raises the emissions tax from $2 to $3, then the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $____. (Hint: recall that the benefits from adopting new technologies are simply the difference in total compliance costs.) THE ANSWER IS NOT 2 or 1.75 Might be 1.25 or 4.50arrow_forwardThe U.S. Department of the Interior filed an environmental impact statement (EIS) with regard to its proposal to lease approximately eighty tracts of submerged land, primarily located off the coast of Louisiana, for oil and gas exploration. Adjacent to the proposed area is the greatest estuarine coastal marsh in the United States. This marsh provides rich nutrients for the Gulf of Mexico, the most productive fishing region of the country.The EIS focused primarily on oil pollution and its negative environmental effect. Three conservation groups contend that the EIS is insufficient in that it does not properly discuss alternatives. The government contends that (a) it need only provide a detailed statement of the alternatives, not a discussion of their environmental impact, and (b) the only alternatives the NEPA requires it to discuss are those which can be adopted and implemented by the agency issuing the impact statement. Is the government correct in its contentions? Why or why not?arrow_forwardIf Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) powers vehicles and is an almost pollution-free fuel. If factory equipped, vehicles can switch between using either CNG or ordinary gasoline. It costs under $4000 extra to buy such a factory-equipped auto. However, the auto industry makes little effort to promote the use of CNG. Instead, the auto industry is rushing to introduce battery-powered autos that use expensive, heavy and dangerous Lithium Ion batteries. Suppose the government sufficiently subsidized the installation of CNG pumps at public service stations. QUESION: Would the effect on demand for CNG powered autos INCREASE OR DECREASE?arrow_forward
- Suppose that a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is MAC = 8 - E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, then its marginal abatement cost function will become MAC = 4 - 0.5E. Moreover, assume that the adoption costs for the new technologies are $3. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $1 to $3, then the firm's total costs increase by $____. (Hint: total costs are different from total compliance costs. Total compliance costs are the sum of TAC and tax payment, while total costs are the sum of total compliance costs and adoption costs (remember that adoption costs are only incurred if the firm actually decides to adopt the new technology).) Please round your final answer to two decimal places if necessary. THE ANSWER IS NOT 9arrow_forwardThe supply and demand of sugar are given as Qs = 5P, Qd = 250- P where Qs is tons supplied per year, P is the price per ton; Qd is tons demanded per year. Because of the pollution associated with production, marginal external costs of 40 are associated with each ton of sugar. Assuming that sugar is sold in a competitive market, What is the market price? How many tons of paper will be produced per year at that price? What is the efficient output of paper? What is the amount of total Pigouvian tax to achieve efficiency? What is the amount of total Pigouvian subsidy to achieve efficiency? Expert Answerarrow_forwardSuppose that a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is MAC = 16 - 2E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, then its marginal abatement cost function will become MAC = 8 - E. If the government raises the emissions tax from $2 to $3, then the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $____. (Hint: recall that the benefits from adopting new technologies are simply the difference in total compliance costs.) Please round your final answer to two decimal places if necessary. Answer is NOT 2. All information is providedarrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning