ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 16, Problem 30P
To determine
Recommend the best alternative.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Calculate the modified and conventional B-C Ratio using AW in four decimal places. Is the project acceptable?
The following three mutually exclusive alternative proposals are being considered for flood proofing a factory building that is located in an area subject to occasional flooding by a nearby river.
1. Do nothing: Damage to the building in a moderate flood is $11,000 and in a severe flood it is $24,000.
2. Protect the building with a one-time initial expenditure of $20,000 so that the building can withstand moderate flooding without any damage and withstand severe flooding with only a$12,000 damage.
3. Protect the building with a one-time initial expenditure of $32,000 so that the building can withstand any flooding with no damage at all.
In any year, there is a 21% probability of moderate flooding and a 10% probability of severe flooding. Using a MARR of 8% per year and a service life of 12 years, determine which of the three alternatives is the most economical.
(a) Calculate EUAC values for each scenario (use negative numbers for costs)
The expected EUAC for the "Do…
Explain how the viewpoint established before a public sector analysis is started can turn an estimate from being categorized as a disbenefit to a cost, or vice versa.
Chapter 16 Solutions
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Ch. 16 - Prob. 1QTCCh. 16 - Prob. 2QTCCh. 16 - Prob. 3QTCCh. 16 - Prob. 4QTCCh. 16 - Prob. 1PCh. 16 - Prob. 2PCh. 16 - Prob. 3PCh. 16 - Prob. 4PCh. 16 - Prob. 5PCh. 16 - Prob. 6P
Ch. 16 - Prob. 7PCh. 16 - Prob. 8PCh. 16 - Prob. 9PCh. 16 - Prob. 10PCh. 16 - Prob. 11PCh. 16 - Prob. 12PCh. 16 - Prob. 13PCh. 16 - Prob. 14PCh. 16 - Prob. 15PCh. 16 - Prob. 16PCh. 16 - Prob. 17PCh. 16 - Prob. 18PCh. 16 - Prob. 19PCh. 16 - Prob. 20PCh. 16 - Prob. 21PCh. 16 - Prob. 23PCh. 16 - Prob. 24PCh. 16 - Prob. 25PCh. 16 - Prob. 26PCh. 16 - Prob. 27PCh. 16 - Prob. 28PCh. 16 - Prob. 29PCh. 16 - Prob. 30PCh. 16 - Prob. 31PCh. 16 - Prob. 32PCh. 16 - Prob. 33PCh. 16 - Prob. 34PCh. 16 - Prob. 35PCh. 16 - Prob. 36PCh. 16 - Prob. 37PCh. 16 - Prob. 38PCh. 16 - Prob. 39PCh. 16 - Prob. 40PCh. 16 - Prob. 41PCh. 16 - Prob. 42PCh. 16 - Prob. 43PCh. 16 - Prob. 44PCh. 16 - Prob. 45PCh. 16 - Prob. 46PCh. 16 - Prob. 47PCh. 16 - Prob. 48PCh. 16 - Prob. 49P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- All of the following cash flows can be identified as benefits, except: (a) Longer tire life because of smooth pavement (b) $200,000 annual income to local businesses because of tourism created by water reservoir (c) Expenditure of $20 million for construction of a highway (d) Fewer highway accidents because of improved lightingarrow_forwardA city government is considering increasing the capacity of the current wastewater treatment plant. The estimated financial data for the project are as follows: Calculate the benefit-cost ratio for this capacity expansion.arrow_forwardDPWH is considering building a new expressway going to Bicol to cut the travel time of consumers going south of Luzon. The expressway will be collecting toll from the users of the expressway. The B–C ratio method must be applied in the evaluation. Investment costs of the structure are estimated to be Php 1,000,000,000, and Php 17,000,000 per year in operating and maintenance costs are anticipated. Revenues generated from the toll are anticipated to be Php 125,000,000 in its first year of operation, with a projected annual rate of increase of 3% per year due to the anticipated annual increase in traffic. Using the problem above, assuming zero market (salvage) value for the expressway at the end of 30 years and a MARR of 10% per year, should the expressway be constructed? Solve using PW.arrow_forward
- In a certain city the promotion of tourism in the city is being considered. It will cost $6,000 to develop the plan. The anticipated annual benefits and costs are as follows: • Annual benefits: Increased local revenue and tax collection $117,400 • Annual support service: expansion of parking lots, restrooms, surveillance and street repairs $48,830 If the city government uses a discount rate of 10% and a study period of 5 years, this tourism project is justifiable according to cost-benefit analysis?arrow_forwardIdentify the following as primarily private or public sector characteristics:a. Large investmentb. No profitsc. Funding from feesd. MARR-based selection criteriae. Low interest ratef. Short project life estimateg. Disbenefitsarrow_forwardAll of the following are primarily associated with public sector projects, except:a. profitsb. taxesc. disbenefitsd. infinite lifearrow_forward
- The Texas Department of Transportation is considering in improving accident prevention countermeasures on the state's accident-prone public highways and bridges. The following set of projects has been recommended for evaluation at three different locations and assumes the budget is $20 million. All alternatives are mutually independent projects. Determine the best combination of projects within the budget constraint.(a) II-Band III-B only(b) I-A, II-A, and III-B(c) 1-B, III-A, and III-B(d) 11-B and IIl-Barrow_forwardThe estimated first cost of a permanent national monument is $2 million with annual benefits and disbenefits estimated at $360,000 and $42,000, respectively. The B/C ratio at 6% per year is closest to: (a) 0.16 (b) 0.88 (c) 1.73 (d) 2.65arrow_forwardThe State Legislative Budget Board approved adding 4000 surveillance cameras along the 800-mile Texas-Mexico border from El Paso to Brownsville at a cost of $300 per camera. In addition to the cost of the cameras, manpower and other resources are expected to cost $3.2 million per year. The benefits associated with interception of people and drugs are estimated to be $5.1 million per year. What is the conventional B/C ratio at an interest rate of 6% per year over a 10-year project period?arrow_forward
- Recent development near Eugene, Oregon, has identified a need for improved access to Interstate 5 at one location. Civil engineers and public planners are considering three alternative access plans. Benefits are estimated for the public in general; disbenefits primarily affect some local proprietors who will see traffic pattern changes as undesirable. Costs are monetary for construction and upkeep, and savings are a reduction in cost of those operations today that will not be necessary in the future. All figures are relative to the present situation, retention of which is still an alternative, and are annualized over the 20-year planning horizon. Solve, a. What is the B/C ratio for each of these alternatives? b. Using incremental B/C ratio analysis, which alternative should be selected? c. Determine the value of B − C for each alternative.arrow_forwardThe State Highway Department is considering a bypass loop that is expected to save motorists $820,000 per year in gasoline and other automobilerelated expenses. However, local businesses will experience revenue losses estimated to be $135,000 each year. The cost of the loop will be $9,000,000. (a) Calculate the conventional B/C ratio using an interest rate of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. (b) Calculate the conventional B/C ratio without considering the disbenefits. Is the project economically justified with and without considering the revenue losses? (c) Develop the single-cell spreadsheet functions that will answer the two questions above.arrow_forwardAs part of the rehabilitation of the downtown area of a southern U.S. city, the Parks and Recreation Department expects to develop the space below several overpasses into basketball, handball, miniature golf, and tennis courts. The estimates are: initial cost of $190,000, life of 20 years, and annual M&O costs of $21,000. The department expects 20,000 people per year to use the facilities an average of 2 hours each. The value of the recreation has been conservatively set at $1.00 per hour. At a discount rate of 6% per year, what is the B/C ratio for the project?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education