Auditing And Assurance Services
17th Edition
ISBN: 9780134897431
Author: ARENS, Alvin A.
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 25DQP
a.
To determine
Compute the required
b.
To determine
State the affect on required sample size and use of this information in your sample size determination when instead of good results poor results were obtained for tests of controls and substantive procedures.
c.
To determine
State the selection of accounts for testing using the systematic selection.
d.
To determine
State whether the population is fairly stated.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The auditors of Landi Corporation wish to use a structured approach to nonstatistical sampling to evaluate the reasonableness of the accounts receivable. Landi has 15,000 receivable accounts with a total book value of $2,500,000. The auditors have assessed the combined level of inherent and control risk at a moderate level and believe that their other substantive procedures are so limited as to require a “maximum” risk assessment. After considering the overall audit plan, the auditors believe that the test’s tolerable misstatement is $57,500. Use figure below to determine the reliability factor. Please calculate the sample size.
Risk That Other Substantive Procedures Will Fail to Detect a Material Misstatement
Combined Assessment of Inherent and Control Risk
Maximum
Moderate
Low
Maximum
3.0
2.3
1.9
Slightly below Maximum
2.7
2.0
1.6
Moderate
2.3
1.6
1.2
Low
1.9
1.2
1.0
A scrap metal dealer claims that tye mean of its cash sales in no more than $80, although an Internal revenue service agent believes that the dealer is being dishonest. Observing a sample of 20 cash customers the agent finds the mean cash sales to be $91 with a standard deviation of $21. Assuming the popUlation is distributed Approximately normally, and using the 0.05 level of significance , will the agents suspicion be confirmed?
James Duffney, CPA, has randomly selected and audited a sample of 100 of Will-Mart’s accounts receivable. Will-Mart has 6,140 accounts receivable accounts with a total book value of $6,000,000. Duffney has determined that the account’s tolerable misstatement is $500,000. His sample results are as follows:
Average audited value $962
Average book value 970
Required:
Calculate the accounts receivable estimated audited value and projected misstatement using the:
a. Mean-per-unit method.
b. Ratio method.
c. Difference method.
Chapter 17 Solutions
Auditing And Assurance Services
Ch. 17 - Prob. 1RQCh. 17 - Prob. 2RQCh. 17 - Prob. 3RQCh. 17 - Prob. 4RQCh. 17 - Prob. 5RQCh. 17 - Prob. 6RQCh. 17 - Prob. 7RQCh. 17 - Prob. 8RQCh. 17 - Prob. 9RQCh. 17 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 17 - Prob. 11RQCh. 17 - Prob. 12RQCh. 17 - Prob. 13RQCh. 17 - Prob. 14RQCh. 17 - Prob. 15RQCh. 17 - Prob. 16RQCh. 17 - Prob. 17RQCh. 17 - Prob. 18RQCh. 17 - Prob. 19RQCh. 17 - Prob. 20RQCh. 17 - Prob. 21.1MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 21.2MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 21.3MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 22.1MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 22.2MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 22.3MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 23.1MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 23.2MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 23.3MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 24.1MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 24.2MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 24.3MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 25DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 26DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 27DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 28DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 29DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 30DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 31DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 32DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 34DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 35DQP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- An auditor had decided to use probability-proportional-to-size (PPS) sampling, also called dollar-unit or cumulative monetary unit (CMU) sampling, in the audit of the client’s accounts receivable balance. The auditor discovered 3 misstatements while doing their testing. Complete the spreadsheet below and calculate the total projected misstatement.arrow_forwardThe 1,000 accounts receivable of Gamco Company have a total book value of $20,000. Wilbur Schneitz, Certified Public Accountant (CPA), has selected and audited a sample of 50 accounts with a total book value of $900. Using nonstatistical variables sampling and the difference estimation technique, Smith has properly estimated a projected misstatement of an overstatement of $3,000 for the entire population. The total audited value of Schneitz’s sample is: 650 1000 750 900arrow_forward. The true proportion of accounts receivable with some kind of error is 8 percent for Moby Group. If an auditor randomly samples 100 accounts receivable, a) is it acceptable to use the normal approximation to estimate the probability that fewer than two will contain errors? Explain your reasoning. b) what is the mean and standard deviation of errors? c) assume the auditor takes a sample of 150, what is the probability that less than 5 will contain errors?arrow_forward
- The 1,500 accounts receivable of DEF Company have a total book value of $30,000. Bob Smith, Certified Public Accountant (CPA), has selected and audited a sample of 50 accounts with a total book value of $1,050. Using the difference estimation technique, Smith has properly estimated a projected misstatement of an overstatement of $3,000 for the entire population. The total audited value of Smith's sample is: Multiple Choice $900 $1,150 $850 $950arrow_forwardEvaluating a Sampling Application. Tom Barton, an assistant accountant with a local CPAfirm, recently graduated from Other University. He studied statistical sampling for auditing in college and wants to impress his employers with his knowledge of modern auditingmethods.Barton decided to select a random sample of payroll checks for the test of controls usinga tolerable rate of deviation of 5 percent and an acceptable risk of overreliance of 5 percent. The senior accountant told Barton that 2 percent of the checks audited last year hadone or more errors in the calculation of net pay. He decided to audit 100 random checks.Because supervisory personnel had paychecks with higher amounts than production workers, he selected 60 of the supervisor checks and 40 checks of the others. He was very carefulto see that the selections of 60 from the April payroll register and 40 from the August payrollregister were random.The audit of this sample yielded two deviations, exactly the 2 percent rate…arrow_forwardBaily Cox, an audit manager, judged that the test of controls of the company’s 50,000 purchase transactions should be based on a tolerable rate of deviation of 6 percent, a risk of overreliance of 5 percent, and an expected population deviation rate of 3 percent. Using AICPAsample size tables, Cox determined that the appropriate sample size in this situation would bea. 49.b. 78.c. 132.d. 195arrow_forward
- MUS is based on attribute sampling theory but modified to evaluate monetary conclusion rather than the rate of occurrence. This can give the impression that MUS is more advanced than RUS since it utilizes the monetary conclusion rather than the rate of occurrence to evaluate statistical findings. MUS is perfect for measuring how many dollars are incorrect, while attribute sampling is excellent for determining the deviation rate. In your opinion, which approach is the most effective when evaluating the effectiveness of customer credit checks?arrow_forwardIn an MUS sample with a sampling interval of $5,000, an auditor discovered that aselected accounts receivable with a recorded amount of $10,000 had an audit valueof $8,000. If this is the only error discovered by the auditor, the projected error ofthe sample would be(1) $1,000. (3) $4,000.(2) $2,000. (4) $5,000.arrow_forwardIn performing a test of controls for ABC, Inc., the auditor wants to know whether Sales order are approved before goods are picked, packed and shipped to customers. The CPAs has stipulated a Tolerable Deviation Rate (TDR) of 8 percent with a Risk of Assessing Control Risk too low of 5 percent. The CPA also anticipates a deviation rate of 2%. What type of sampling plan should the auditor use for this test? Attribute sampling Monetary samplingarrow_forward
- Carson Allister is performing a PPS application in the audit of Bird Company’s accounts receivable. Based on the acceptable level of the risk of incorrect acceptance of 5 percent and a tolerable misstatement of $120,000, Allister has calculated a sample size of 75 items and a sampling interval of $25,000. After examining the sample items, the following misstatements were identified: (Use Exhibit F.A.2.) Item Recorded Balance Audited Value 1 $35,000 $28,000 2 10,000 8,000 3 6,000 3,000 Required: Calculate the upper limit on misstatements for Bird Company’s accounts receivable.arrow_forwardEvan Kristopher, CPA intends to use probability-proportional-to-size sampling. He has properly selected and audited a sample of 100 accounts receivable from his client’s population of 3,000 accounts. He calculated a sampling interval of $6,000 and the tolerable misstatement for the account is $30,000. Evan also recalls that “basic precision” is equal to the appropriate reliability factor multiplied times the sampling interval. He wishes to accept a risk of incorrect acceptance of 10%. He found that 97 of the 100 accounts in the sample were properly calculated. However, the following three errors existed: Book Value Audited Value $75 $70 1,000 750 9,300 6,720 Required: Calculate the projected misstatement. Calculate the basic precision. Calculate the incremental allowance. Calculate the upper limit on misstatement. What would the auditors’ conclusion be for the population based on the analysis? explain pleasearrow_forwardEvan Kristopher, CPA intends to use probability-proportional-to-size sampling. He has properly selected and audited a sample of 100 accounts receivable from his client’s population of 3,000 accounts. He calculated a sampling interval of $6,000 and the tolerable misstatement for the account is $30,000. Evan also recalls that “basic precision” is equal to the appropriate reliability factor multiplied times the sampling interval. He wishes to accept a risk of incorrect acceptance of 10%. He found that 97 of the 100 accounts in the sample were properly calculated. However, the following three errors existed: Book Value Audited Value $75 $70 1,000 750 9,300 6,720 Required: Calculate the projected misstatement. Calculate the basic precision. Calculate the incremental allowance. Calculate the upper limit on misstatement. What would the auditors’ conclusion be for the population based on the analysis?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning