Auditing And Assurance Services
17th Edition
ISBN: 9780134897431
Author: ARENS, Alvin A.
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 27DQP
To determine
Determine the appropriate response for each of the sampling results from the options
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The following are auditor judgments and attributes sampling results for six populations. Assume large population sizes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
EPER (in percent)
2
0.5
1
0
2
5
TER (in percent)
6
4
20
3
8
10
ARO (in percent)
10
5
10
5
5
10
Actual sample size
100
100
20
100
60
60
Actual number of exceptions in the sample
2
3
1
1
1
5
For each population, did the auditor select a smaller sample size than is indicated by using the attributes sampling tables in Table 15-8(p. 519) for determining sample size? What are the implications of selecting either a larger or smaller sample size than those determined using the tables?
Calculate the SER and CUER for each population.
For which of the six populations should the sample results be considered unacceptable? What options are available to the auditor?
Why is analysis of the exceptions necessary even when the populations are considered acceptable?
For…
Evan Kristopher, CPA intends to use probability-proportional-to-size sampling. He has properly selected and audited a sample of 100 accounts receivable from his client’s population of 3,000 accounts. He calculated a sampling interval of $6,000 and the tolerable misstatement for the account is $30,000.
Evan also recalls that “basic precision” is equal to the appropriate reliability factor multiplied times the sampling interval. He wishes to accept a risk of incorrect acceptance of 10%.
He found that 97 of the 100 accounts in the sample were properly calculated. However, the following three errors existed:
Book Value
Audited Value
$75
$70
1,000
750
9,300
6,720
Required:
Calculate the projected misstatement.
Calculate the basic precision.
Calculate the incremental allowance.
Calculate the upper limit on misstatement.
What would the auditors’ conclusion be for the population based on the analysis?
explain please
Evan Kristopher, CPA intends to use probability-proportional-to-size sampling. He has properly selected and audited a sample of 100 accounts receivable from his client’s population of 3,000 accounts. He calculated a sampling interval of $6,000 and the tolerable misstatement for the account is $30,000.
Evan also recalls that “basic precision” is equal to the appropriate reliability factor multiplied times the sampling interval. He wishes to accept a risk of incorrect acceptance of 10%.
He found that 97 of the 100 accounts in the sample were properly calculated. However, the following three errors existed:
Book Value
Audited Value
$75
$70
1,000
750
9,300
6,720
Required:
Calculate the projected misstatement.
Calculate the basic precision.
Calculate the incremental allowance.
Calculate the upper limit on misstatement.
What would the auditors’ conclusion be for the population based on the analysis?
Chapter 17 Solutions
Auditing And Assurance Services
Ch. 17 - Prob. 1RQCh. 17 - Prob. 2RQCh. 17 - Prob. 3RQCh. 17 - Prob. 4RQCh. 17 - Prob. 5RQCh. 17 - Prob. 6RQCh. 17 - Prob. 7RQCh. 17 - Prob. 8RQCh. 17 - Prob. 9RQCh. 17 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 17 - Prob. 11RQCh. 17 - Prob. 12RQCh. 17 - Prob. 13RQCh. 17 - Prob. 14RQCh. 17 - Prob. 15RQCh. 17 - Prob. 16RQCh. 17 - Prob. 17RQCh. 17 - Prob. 18RQCh. 17 - Prob. 19RQCh. 17 - Prob. 20RQCh. 17 - Prob. 21.1MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 21.2MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 21.3MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 22.1MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 22.2MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 22.3MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 23.1MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 23.2MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 23.3MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 24.1MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 24.2MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 24.3MCQCh. 17 - Prob. 25DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 26DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 27DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 28DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 29DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 30DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 31DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 32DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 34DQPCh. 17 - Prob. 35DQP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Consider a sample with data values of 10, 20, 12, 17, and 16. a. Compute the mean and median. b. Consider a sample with data values 10, 20, 12, 17, 16, and 12. How would you expect the mean and median for these sample data to compare to the mean and median for part a (higher, lower, or the same)? Compute the mean and median for the sample data 10, 20, 12, 17, 16, and 12.arrow_forwardAssume that an account with a recorded balance of $5,000 has an audited value of $3,000. By using monetary unit sampling, if the sampling interval is $1,500, the projected misstatement would bea. $600.b. $900.c. $2,000.d. $3,000.arrow_forwardMistakes in a Monetary Unit Sampling Application. Kelsey Mead, CPA, was engaged toaudit Jiffy Company’s financial statements for the year ended August 31.For the current year, Mead decided to use MUS to select accounts receivable for confirmation because MUS uses each account in the population as a separate sampling unit.Mead expected to discover many overstatements but presumed that the MUS sample sizestill would be smaller than the corresponding sample size for classical variables sampling.Mead reasoned that the MUS sample would automatically result in a stratified samplebecause each account would have an equal chance of being selected for confirmation. Additionally, the selection of negative (credit) balances would be facilitated without specialconsiderations.Mead computed the sample size using the risk of incorrect acceptance, the total recordedbook amount of the receivables, and the number of misstated accounts allowed. Meaddivided the total recorded book amount of the receivables…arrow_forward
- In an MUS sample with a sampling interval of $5,000, an auditor discovered that aselected accounts receivable with a recorded amount of $10,000 had an audit valueof $8,000. If this is the only error discovered by the auditor, the projected error ofthe sample would be(1) $1,000. (3) $4,000.(2) $2,000. (4) $5,000.arrow_forwardIf the UML or Projected Misstatement in a sampling is $8,000, while the tolerable misstatement is $9,000, what would an auditor likely conclude? A) Since the UML or Projected Misstatement is less than the tolerable misstatement, the account is not materially misstated. B) Since the UML or Projected Misstatement is less than the tolerable misstatement, the account is misstated. C) The analysis has been improperly performed since the UML or Projected Misstatement is unequal to the tolerable misstatementarrow_forwardIn calculating the projected misstatement in monetary unit sampling, accounts with a book value larger than the sampling interval are extended to the projected misstatement at their: Misstatement amount. Actual book value. Tainting percentage times the sampling interval. Tainting percentage times their book value.arrow_forward
- A component of an account balance has a recorded balance of $10,000 and an audited valueof $8,000. By using monetary unit sampling, if the sampling interval is $20,000, the projected misstatement would bea. $2,000.b. $4,000.c. $5,000.d. $10,000.arrow_forwardSample Size and Sampling Interval Determination: Monetary Unit Sampling. CaseyPaul is considering the use of MUS in examining Stanley’s accounts receivable, which wererecorded at $300,000. Using the audit risk model, Paul has identified a necessary risk ofincorrect acceptance of 10 percent and has established a tolerable misstatement of $25,000and an expected misstatement of $10,000.Required:a. Determine the necessary sample size for the audit of Stanley’s accounts receivable.b. Based on the sample size determined in part (a), what is the appropriate sampling interval?c. Briefly describe how Paul would select the sample from a computerized customer listthat Stanley maintains.d. How would each of the following changes in Paul’s sampling plan impact the sample size andsampling interval? For each change, use the original parameters noted in the problem. (Verifyyour answer by calculating the sample size associated with each change.)1. A reduction in the necessary level of the risk of…arrow_forwardSample Size Determination. For each of the following independent cases, use AICPA sample size tables to identify the missing value(s). Control 1 2 3 4 Risk of overreliance 5.0% 5.0% 10.0% (d) Expected population deviation rate 1.25% 2.5% (c) 1.25% Tolerable rate of deviation 7.0% (b) 6.0% 6.0% Sample size (a) 68 153 78arrow_forward
- Baily Cox, an audit manager, judged that the test of controls of the company’s 50,000 purchase transactions should be based on a tolerable rate of deviation of 6 percent, a risk of overreliance of 5 percent, and an expected population deviation rate of 3 percent. Using AICPAsample size tables, Cox determined that the appropriate sample size in this situation would bea. 49.b. 78.c. 132.d. 195arrow_forwardCalculate total projected mistreatment if the following three mistreatments were discovered in a PPS sample when the sampling interval is $1,000. Recorded Amount Audit Amount Sampling interval Total Projected Mistreatment 1st mistreatment $400 $320 $1,000 _________________ 2nd mistreatment 500 0 $1,000 _________________ 3rd mistreatment 3,000 2,500 $1,000 _________________arrow_forwardd. Assume that based on additional controls implemented by ELM, your audit team has decided to reduce the expected misstatement from $77,928 to $19,482 (0.5 percent of the recorded balance of the transactions). What is the necessary sample size, holding all other factors constant?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305627734
Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Publisher:Cengage Learning