Bundle: Principles of Microeconomics, Loose-Leaf Version, 7th + Principles of Macroeconomics, Loose-Leaf Version, 7th + MindTap Economics, 2 terms (12 ... for Mankiw’s Principles of Economics, 7th
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781337380300
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 6PA
Subpart (a):
To determine
Payoff matrix of classmates.
Subpart (b):
To determine
Payoff matrix of classmates.
Subpart (c):
To determine
Payoff matrix of classmates.
Subpart (d):
To determine
Payoff matrix of classmates.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
You and a classmate are assigned a project on which you will receive one combined grade. (You each want to receive a good grade, but you also want to avoid hard work. In particular, here is the situation:• If both of you work hard, you both get an A, which gives each of you 40 units of happiness.• If only one of you works hard, you both get a B, which gives each of you 30 units of happiness.• If neither of you works hard, you both get a D, which gives each of you 10 units of happiness.• Working hard costs 25 units of happiness.
a. Fill in the payoffs in the following decision box:
REFER IMAGE
b. What is the likely outcome? Explain your answer.c. If you get this classmate as your partner on a series of projects throughout the year, rather than only once, how might that change the outcome you predicted in part (b)?d. Another classmate cares more about good grades: She gets 50 units of happiness for a B and 80 units of happiness for an A. If this classmate were your partner (but your…
You and a classmate are assigned a project on which you will receive one combined grade. (You each want to receive a good grade, but you also want to avoid hard work. In particular, here is the situation:• If both of you work hard, you both get an A, which gives each of you 40 units of happiness.• If only one of you works hard, you both get a B, which gives each of you 30 units of happiness.• If neither of you works hard, you both get a D, which gives each of you 10 units of happiness.• Working hard costs 25 units of happiness.a. Fill in the payoffs in the following decision box:
b. What is the likely outcome? Explain your answer.c. If you get this classmate as your partner on a series of projects throughout the year, rather than only once, how might that change the outcome you predicted in part (b)?d. Another classmate cares more about good grades: She gets 50 units of happiness for a B and 80 units of happiness for an A. If this classmate were your partner (but your preferences…
two players, a and b are playing an asymmetrical game. there are n points on the game board. each turn player a targets a pair of points and player b says whether those two points are connected or unconnected. a can target each pair only once and the game ends when all pairs have been targeted. player b wins if a point is connected with all other points on the very last turn, while player a wins if any point is connected with all other points on any turn but the very last one or if no point is connected to all other points after the last turn. for what values of n does either player have a winning strategy?
Chapter 17 Solutions
Bundle: Principles of Microeconomics, Loose-Leaf Version, 7th + Principles of Macroeconomics, Loose-Leaf Version, 7th + MindTap Economics, 2 terms (12 ... for Mankiw’s Principles of Economics, 7th
Ch. 17.1 - Prob. 1QQCh. 17.2 - Prob. 2QQCh. 17.3 - Prob. 3QQCh. 17 - Prob. 1CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 2CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 3CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 4CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 5CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 6CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 1QR
Ch. 17 - Prob. 2QRCh. 17 - Prob. 3QRCh. 17 - Prob. 4QRCh. 17 - Prob. 5QRCh. 17 - Prob. 6QRCh. 17 - Prob. 7QRCh. 17 - Prob. 1PACh. 17 - Prob. 2PACh. 17 - Prob. 3PACh. 17 - Prob. 4PACh. 17 - Prob. 5PACh. 17 - Prob. 6PACh. 17 - A case study in the chapter describes a phone...Ch. 17 - Prob. 8PACh. 17 - Prob. 9PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Two oil companies are deciding how much oil to extract from their properties, which lie above the same underground reservoir. The faster that oil is extracted, the less total oil is extracted. Letting x denote the extraction rate for company X and y denote the extraction rate for company Y, we assume that the total amount of oil extracted is 1/(x + y) million gallons of oil. Of the total amount that is extracted, the share going to company X is x/(x + y), and the share to company Y is y/(x + y); that is, a company’s share depends on how fast it extracts compared with the other company. The price of oil is $100 per gallon. Each company chooses its extraction rate from the interval [1,10] in order to maximize the monetary value of the oil that it extracts. Find the Nash equilibrium extraction rates. (Note: You can assume that the payoff function is hill shaped.)arrow_forwardTwo individuals each receive fifty dollars to play the following game. Independently of each other, they decide how much money to put in a common pot. They keep the rest for themselves. As for the money in the pot, it is increased by 80% and then distributed equally among the two individuals. For instance, suppose that the first individual puts $10 in the pot while the second individual puts $20. Increasing the total pot of $30 by 80% gives $54 to share equally between the two individuals. So the first individual’s payoff in this case is $(40 + 27) = $67, while the second individual’s payoff is $(30 + 27) = $57. (a) Compute the Nash equilibrium. (b) Is the Nash equilibrium Pareto efficient? Explainarrow_forwardPlayer 1 and Player 2 are trying to agree on how to split a pie of size 1 in a two-stage bargaining game. If no agreement is reached after the two stages are complete, the pie is split for them according to a pre-arranged agreement that gives Player 1 and Player 2 one-quarter and three quarters of the pie, respectively. In the first stage, Player 1 makes an offer (x1, x2), where x1 + x2 = 1. Player 2 can either accept this offer (at which point the game ends and the pie is split according to Player 1’s offer), or can make a counter-offer. When Player 2 makes a counter offer, Player 1 can either accept (in which case the pie is split according to Player 2’s offer) or can reject, in which case the pie is split according to the pre-arranged agreement. Both players have a discount factor d – getting dx in the first stage (after Player 1’s proposal) is as good as getting x in the second stage (after Player 2’s proposal). a) In the last stage of the game, Player 1 will accept any offer…arrow_forward
- We have a group of three friends: Kramer, Jerry and Elaine. Kramer has a $10 banknote that he will auction off, and Jerry and Elaine will be bidding for it. Jerry and Elaine have to submit their bids to Kramer privately, both at the same time. We assume that both Jerry and Elaine only have $2 that day, and the available strategies to each one of them are to bid either$0, $1 or $2. Whoever places the highest bid, wins the $10 banknote. In case of a tie (that is, if Jerry and Elaine submit the same bid), each one of them gets $5. Regardless of who wins the auction, each bidder has to pay to Kramer whatever he or she bid. Does this game have a Nash Equilibrium? (If not, why not? If yes, what is the Nash Equilibrium?)arrow_forwardWe have a group of three friends: Kramer, Jerry and Elaine. Kramer has a $10 banknote that he will auction off, and Jerry and Elaine will be bidding for it. Jerry and Elaine have to submit their bids to Kramer privately, both at the same time. We assume that both Jerry and Elaine only have $2 that day, and the available strategies to each one of them are to bid either$0, $1 or $2. Whoever places the highest bid, wins the $10 banknote. In case of a tie (that is, if Jerry and Elaine submit the same bid), each one of them gets $5. Regardless of who wins the auction, each bidder has to pay to Kramer whatever he or she bid. Does Jerry have any strictly dominant strategy? Does Elaine?arrow_forwardTwo cigarette manufacturers repeatedly play the following simultaneous-move billboard advertising game. If both advertise, each earns profits of $0 million. If neither advertises, each earns profits of $10 million. If one advertises and the other does not, the firm that advertises earns $20 million and the other firm loses $1 million. If there is a 10 percent chance that the government will ban cigarette sales in any given year, can the firms “collude” by agreeing not to advertise?arrow_forward
- Suppose that two corporations, Analytica and Bobmetrics, are negotiating the share of profit from a time sensitive joint project. The total profit generated by the project is £10 million. However, every day that the deal is delayed reduces the value of the total profit by £1 million. The way the negotiation is set up is the following: in the first day, Analytica’s lawyers propose a split of the profits, and Bobmetrics’ lawyers can agree, or they can discuss it some more and make their own offer on the second day. After that the two teams alternate. Analytica gets to make proposals on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, while Bobmetrics makes proposals on days 2, 4, 6, 8 an 10. On day 11, the profit from the joint project becomes 0. The negotiations stop when either company accepts the proposal of the other, or on day 11. Find the subgame perfect Nash equilibria of this dynamic negotiation game. What happens when the loss of value is slower or faster? What conclusions can you draw? Briefly explain…arrow_forwardSuppose Toyota and Honda must decide whether to make a new breed of side-impact airbags standard equipment on all models. Side-impact airbags raise the price of each automobile by $1,000. If both firms make side-impact airbags standard equipment, each company will earn profits of $0.5 billion. If neither company adopts the side-impact airbag technology, each company will earn $1.5 billion. If one company adopts the technology as standard equipment and the other does not, the adopting company will earn a profit of $2 billion and the other company will earn $-1 billion.If you were a decision maker at Honda, would you make side-impact airbags standard equipment?multiple choice 1 There is not enough information to answer the question. No Yes If Toyota and Honda were able to cooperate, would you expect this same outcome?multiple choice 2 Yes No There is not enough information to answer the question.arrow_forwardTwo street racers are playing a simultaneous game of chicken. They have to race towards each other and whoever swerves first is chicken and faces shame, a loss of 8. while the winner enjoys a gain of 3. If neither stop, they would crash into each other, a loss of 10. If both of them swerve at the same time, they are both chicken and face a loss of 5 each If player B destroys his own brakes before the race, and player A sees that, what would the new Nash equilibrium be in this case? a. Player A stops, Player B does not b. Player B stops, Player A does not c. Both players stop d. Neither players stoparrow_forward
- Suppose Toyota and Honda must decide whether to make a new kind of side-impact airbags standard equipment on all models. Side impact-airbags raise the price of each automobile by $1000. If both firms make side-impact airbags standard equipment, each company will earn profits of $2.5 billion. If neither company adopts the side-impact airbag technology, each company will earn $1 billion (due to lost sales to other automakers). If one company adopts the technology as standard equipment and the other does not, the adopting company will earn a profit of $3 billion and the other company will lose $1.5 billion. If you were a decision maker at Honda, would you make side-impact airbags standard equipment?arrow_forwardSuppose Toyota and Honda must decide whether to make a new breed of side-impact airbags standard equipment on all models. Side-impact airbags raise the price of each automobile by $1,000. If both firms make side-impact airbags standard equipment, each company will earn profits of $2.5 billion. If neither company adopts the side-impact airbag technology, each company will earn $1 billion (due to lost sales to other automakers). If one company adopts the technology as standard equipment and the other does not, the adopting company will earn a profit of $3 billion and the other company will lose $1.5 billion. If you were a decision maker at Honda, would you make side-impact airbags standard equipment? Explain.arrow_forwardTwo players bargain over 1 unit of a divisible object. Bargaining starts with an offer of player 1, which player 2 either accepts or rejects. If player 2 rejects, then player 1 makes another offer; if player 2 rejects once more, then player 2 makes an offer. If player 1 rejects the offer of player 2, then once more it is the turn of player 1 where he makes two consecutive offers. As long as an agreement has not been reached this procedure continues. For example, suppose that agreement is reached at period 5, it follows that player 1 makes offers in period 1,2 then player 2 makes an o er in period 3, then player 1 makes offers in 4,5. Negotiations can continue indefinitely, agreement in period 't' with a division (x, 1- x) leads to payoffs ( , (1-x)).(The difference from Rubinstein's alternating offer bargaining is that player one makes two consecutive offers, whereas player 2 makes a single offer in her turn.) a. Show that there is a subgame perfect equilibrium in which player 2's…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning