Explain why the statement ‘The Kruskal-Wallis test should be the primary [test] used to compare differences when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal’ is true for Kruskal-Wallis test and for non-parametric tests in general.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 18, Problem 32PR

To determine

Explain why the statement ‘The Kruskal-Wallis test should be the primary [test] used to compare differences when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal’ is true for Kruskal-Wallis test and for non-parametric tests in general.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 18, Problem 32PR

To determine

Explain why the statement ‘The Kruskal-Wallis test should be the primary [test] used to compare differences when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal’ is true for Kruskal-Wallis test and for non-parametric tests in general.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 18, Problem 32PR

To determine

Explain why the statement ‘The Kruskal-Wallis test should be the primary [test] used to compare differences when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal’ is true for Kruskal-Wallis test and for non-parametric tests in general.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 18, Problem 32PR

To determine

Explain why the statement ‘The Kruskal-Wallis test should be the primary [test] used to compare differences when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal’ is true for Kruskal-Wallis test and for non-parametric tests in general.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 18, Problem 32PR

To determine

Explain why the statement ‘The Kruskal-Wallis test should be the primary [test] used to compare differences when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal’ is true for Kruskal-Wallis test and for non-parametric tests in general.

Answer 6

Chapter 18, Problem 32PR

To determine

Explain why the statement ‘The Kruskal-Wallis test should be the primary [test] used to compare differences when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal’ is true for Kruskal-Wallis test and for non-parametric tests in general.

Answer 7

Chapter 18, Problem 32PR

To determine

Explain why the statement ‘The Kruskal-Wallis test should be the primary [test] used to compare differences when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal’ is true for Kruskal-Wallis test and for non-parametric tests in general.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 11

Ch. 18.1 - Prob. 1.1LC Ch. 18.1 - Prob. 1.2LC Ch. 18.1 - Prob. 1.3LC Ch. 18.3 - Prob. 2.1LC Ch. 18.3 - Prob. 2.2LC Ch. 18.3 - Prob. 2.3LC Ch. 18.3 - Prob. 2.4LC Ch. 18.5 - Prob. 3.1LC Ch. 18.5 - Prob. 3.2LC Ch. 18.5 - Prob. 3.3LC

Explain why the statement ‘The Kruskal-Wallis test should be the primary [test] used to compare differences when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal’ is true for Kruskal-Wallis test and for non-parametric tests in general.

Solution Summary: The author explains that Kruskal-Wallis test and non-parametric tests are used to compare differences when populations are not at least approximately normal.

Videos

Explain why the statement ‘The Kruskal-Wallis test should be the primary [test] used to compare differences when it is known that populations are not at least approximately normal’ is true for Kruskal-Wallis test and for non-parametric tests in general.

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 18 Solutions