Concept explainers
Case summary:
Company L has chosen to procure an unused advertise information and citation framework for its R domestic office. The framework gets current showcase costs and other data from a few on-line information administrations, at that point either shows the data on a partition or shops it for afterward recovery by the company's agents. The framework moreover licenses clients to call up current cites on extremities within the campaign. The gear costs $1,000,000, and, in the event that it was obtained, company L might get a term credit for the total buy cost at a 10 percent intrigued rate. In spite of the fact that the gear contains a 6-year valuable time, it is classed as a special-need computer, so it comes under the MACRS three-year lesson. In the event that the framework was obtained, a four-year upkeep agreement can be achieved at a fetched of $20,000 per annum, owing at the starting of per year. The hardware would be marketed after for a long time, and the leading appraise of its leftover esteem at that time is $200,000. Be that as it may, since real-time show framework innovation is transforming quickly, the real surplus value is dubious. As an elective to the borrow-and-purchase arrangement, the gear producer educated $ L that Solidified Renting would be ready to type in a 4-year rule rent on the gear, counting support, for installments of $260,000 at the starting of each year. Company L’s negligible federal-plus-state charge rate is 40 %.
To determine: The outcome would increase ambiguity about the extra value have on L’s lease-versus-buy choice.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 19 Solutions
Bundle: Intermediate Financial Management, 13th + MindTap Finance, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card
- Now assume that the equipments residual value could be as low as 0 or as high as 400,000, but 200,000 is the expected value. Because the residual value is riskier than the other relevant cash flows, this differential risk should be incorporated into the analysis. Describe how this could be accomplished. (No calculations are necessary, but explain how you would modify the analysis if calculations were required.) What effect would the residual values increased uncertainty have on Lewis lease-versus-purchase decision?arrow_forwardAn analysis of a proposal by the net present value method indicates that the present value of future cash inflows is less than the amount to be invested Which of the following statements best describes the results of this analysis ? The proposal is undesirable , and the rate of return expected from the proposal is less than the minimum rate used for the analysis . The proposal is desirable , and the rate of return expected from the proposal is less than the minimum rate used for the analysis The proposal is desirable , and the rate of return expected from the proposal exceeds the minimum rate used for the analysis . The proposal is undesirable , and the rate of return expected from the proposal exceeds the minimum rate used for the analysis .arrow_forwardEhrmann Data Systems is considering a project that has the following cash flow and WACC data. What is the project's MIRR? Note that a project's projected MIRR can be less than the WACC (and even negative), in which case it will be rejected.arrow_forward
- Which of the following statements is CORRECT? Assume that the project being considered has normal cash flows, with one outflow followed by a series of inflows. Select one: a. The lower the WACC used to calculate it, the lower the calculated NPV will be. b. If a project's NPV is greater than zero, then its IRR must be less than zero. c. The NPV of a relatively low-risk project should be found using a relatively high WACC. d. A project's NPV is found by compounding the cash inflows at the IRR to find the terminal value (TV), then discounting the TV at the WACC. e. If a project's NPV is less than zero, then its IRR must be less than the WACC.arrow_forwardWhen the present value of the cash inflows exceeds the initial cost of a project, then the project should be : A. rejected because NPV is negative. B. accepted because NPV is greater than 1. C. accepted because the profitability index is negative. D. rejected because the internal rate of return is negative.arrow_forwardWhich of the following statements describing the elements of intrinsic valuation is most accurate? A.) When the present value of the cashflows is discounted with the appropriate rate and this present value is positive, then the asset providing these cashflows has a value to the investor. B.) The risk-free rate is the lowest rate that an investor can earn from short-term investments. C.) Cashflows may include depreciation expenses and amortization costs. D.) A simple calculation of present values of expected cashflows of different investments using the risk free rate would be enough to determine which asset is best.arrow_forward
- Which of the following is true of the cash payback period? a.the longer the payback, the longer the estimated life of the asset b.the longer the payback, the sooner the cash spent on the investment is recovered c.the shorter the payback, the less likely the possibility of obsolescence d.All of these answers are correct.arrow_forwardd. Consider the following statement "If an analyst decides to use real options methodology to value a project, estimating a standard Discounted Cash Flow model is useless". Do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.arrow_forward3. In a comparison of the NPV and IRR techniques, which of the following is true? statements A. Both methods give the same accept or reject decision, regardless of the pattern of the cash flows. B. IRR is technically superior to NPV and easier to calculate. C. The NPV approach is superior if discount rates are expected to vary over the life of the project. D. NPV and accounting ROCE can be confused.arrow_forward
- An analysis of a proposal by the net present value method indicated that the present value of future cash inflows exceeded the amount to be invested. Which of the following statements best describes the results of this analysis? A)The proposal is undesirable, and the rate of return expected from the proposal is less than the minimum rate used for the analysis. B)The proposal is desirable, and the rate of return expected from the proposal exceeds the minimum rate used for the analysis. C)The proposal is undesirable, and the rate of return expected from the proposal exceeds the minimum rate used for the analysis. D)The proposal is desirable, and the rate of return expected from the proposal is less than the minimum rate used for the analysis.arrow_forwardMoerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no conflict will exist. WACC: CFS CFL O a. $59.20 O b. $62.75 O c. $51.51 O d. $65.71 O e. $53.28 6.75% 0 -$1,025 -$1,025 1 $650 $100 2 $450 $300 3 $250 $500 4 $50 $700arrow_forwardWhich is least likely correct about security valuation?a. The calculated or determined value considers the stream of future cash flows.b. The calculated or determined value equals the market price.c. The calculated or determined value considers the risks involved and the opportunity cost.d. The calculated or determined value allows the investors to evaluate whether a security isovervalued or undervalued.e. All of the abovearrow_forward
- Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage LearningCornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning