Labor Economics
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781260484434
Author: George Borjas
Publisher: Mcgraw-hill Higher Education (us)
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 14P
(a)
To determine
Graphically illustrate the worker’s original budget line and the budget line under the negative income tax (NIT).
(b)
To determine
Determine that the worker will choose to work fewer hours if NIT is adopted.
(c)
To determine
Determine whether the worker’s utility be greater under NIT.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
For every hour up to 40 hours of work each week, Mary earns $16/hour, and for any extra
hour in excess of 40, she earns $20/hour. The current tax rate that she faces is 20%. She
also needs to pay $4 per each hour she works for childcare service while receives $80 in
childcare support payments each week. Mary has 16 non-sleeping hours a day (112
hours) in a week. Her non-labour market income is $60 per week. What will be her
weekly consumption amount if she works for 58 hours a week?
Carole works 35 hours a week at a wage rate of $20. Thus, her total weekly income is $700 On this income, she pays total taxes of $49.00 However, she calculates that on the last hour that she works, she pays $4.00 Carole's average tax rate is% (Round your response to two decimal places) Carole's marginal tax rate is% (Round your response to two decimal places) D
John has gross biweekly earnings of $743.61. By claiming 1 more withholding allowance, John would have $19 more in his take home pay. How many withholding allowances does John currently claim?
Chapter 2 Solutions
Labor Economics
Ch. 2 - Prob. 1RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2RQCh. 2 - Prob. 3RQCh. 2 - Prob. 4RQCh. 2 - Prob. 5RQCh. 2 - Prob. 6RQCh. 2 - Prob. 7RQCh. 2 - Prob. 8RQCh. 2 - Prob. 9RQCh. 2 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 2 - Prob. 11RQCh. 2 - Prob. 12RQCh. 2 - Prob. 1PCh. 2 - Prob. 2PCh. 2 - Prob. 3PCh. 2 - Prob. 4PCh. 2 - Prob. 5PCh. 2 - Prob. 6PCh. 2 - Prob. 7PCh. 2 - Prob. 8PCh. 2 - Prob. 9PCh. 2 - Prob. 10PCh. 2 - A worker plans to retire at the age of 65, at...Ch. 2 - Prob. 12PCh. 2 - Prob. 13PCh. 2 - Prob. 14PCh. 2 - Prob. 15P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- One proposal for reforming the welfare system is to create a negative income tax. Under the negative income tax, each person is entitled to a grant of G dollars permonth. For every dollar the person earns, the grant is reduced by t dollars. a. Suppose G = 200 and t = 0.40. Consider an individual whose hourly wage = $10. There are 30 days in a month, so the total allotment of T = 720. Sketch the budgetconstraint before and after the introduction of the negative income tax. b. Would people work more or less with the implementation of this system? c. What if t = 100%? Explain!arrow_forwardEric earns a base salary of $50,000 as a shipwreck diver and is subject to the following hypothetical income tax bracket. Eric is considering taking on an additional dive that will increase his income by $5,000. In order for Eric to deem the dive worth his time, it must earn him $3,000 after taxes. Please round all answers to two decimal places. Income $0-$10,000 $10,001-$30,000 $30,001-$50,000 $50,001+ Tax rate 5% 10% 20% 50% What is the marginal tax rate associated with taking on this dive? What is Eric's average tax rate if the extra dive is accepted? Given the information, will Eric undertake this extra dive? yes no O need more information How much does Eric end up paying in taxes?arrow_forwardthe employee has worked. A typical case Luba works on commission and has a weekly pay period. One week, she was paid $150.00 in commission and worked 25 hours. The minimum wage applicable to Luba is $14.25 an hour. The minimum wage ($14.25) multiplied by the number of hours worked in the pay period (25) is $356.25. Luba is owed the difference between her commission pay ($150) and the required minimum wage ($356.25). Calculate: Luba's employer owes her $arrow_forward
- (i) Keith’s marginal utility of leisure is C – 20 and his marginal utility of consumption is L – 50. There are 110 hours in the week available to split between work and leisure. Keith receives £250 of welfare payments each week regardless of how much he works (assume he spends all of his welfare payments on consumption). What is Keith’s reservation wage? (ii) Suppose Danny receives the same welfare payments each week as Keith and has the same number of available hours (110). However, Danny’s indifference curve is flatter than Keith’s. How would his reservation wage compare to Keith’s? Why?arrow_forwardA worker has no non-labor income and is earning $14/hour. He maximizes utility by working 40 hours per week. Begin by drawing a graph that illustrates this to be the utility-maximizing solution. The same worker loses his job. He is entitled to unemployment compensation that will pay up to 50% of his weekly earnings. The worker has an opportunity to supplement his unemployment compensation by taking a job that pays $7/hour. Using the same graph, show the worker's new budget line and his utility-maximizing decision as whether to work the new job and how many hours to work. Make sure your graph shows the relevant budget lines and indifference curves.arrow_forwardThe following table shows income tax rates in Econoland. Annual Income Up to $60,000 From $60,001 to $90,000 Over $90,000 This is an example of a Tax Rate 10% 20% 30% income tax. Nick, a resident of Econoland, currently works 20 hours a week and earns an annual income of $60,000. After paying income taxes, Nick receives per year. If Nick works an additional 10 hours a week (30 hours a week total), his annual income will be $90,000. After paying income taxes, Nick will receive per year. In other words, by working an additional 10 hours per week, Nick will receive an additional If Nick works 10 more hours in a week (40 hours a week total), his annual income will further increase to $120,000. After paying income taxes, Nick will receive per year. In other words, by working 10 more hours per week, Nick will receive more than what he would receive if he works only 30 hours a week. As Nick works more, the additional amount he receives from working 10 more hours " which means his cost of…arrow_forward
- Mark can work up to 80 hours each week at a pre-tax hourly wage of $20 but faces a constant 20 percent tax on his earnings. Thus, Mark maximizes his utility by choosing to work 50 hours per week. The government proposes a negative income tax whereby everyone is given $300 per week and anyone can supplement their income further by working. To pay for the negative income tax, tax on earnings will be increased to 50 percent. On a single graph, draw Mark's original budget line and his budget line under the negative income tax. Show that Mark will work fewer hours if the negative income tax is implemented Will Mark's utility be greater under the negative income tax? Discuss your answer.arrow_forwardConsider a person who can work up to 80 hours each week at a pretax wage of $20 per hour but faces a constant 20 percent payroll tax. Under these conditions, the worker maximizes her utility by choosing to work 50 hours each week. The government proposes a negative income tax whereby everyone is given $300 each week and anyone can supplement her income further by working. To pay for the negative income tax, the payroll tax rate will be increased to 50 percent.a. On a single graph, draw the worker’s original budget line and her budget line under the negative income tax.b. Show that the worker will choose to work fewer hours if the negative income tax is a dopted.c. Will the worker’s utility be greater under the negative income tax?arrow_forward22. Taro's utility function is U(C, R) = 32√√R+C, where R is the amount of leisure. He has 16 hours a day to divide between work and leisure. He gets $10 an hour no matter how many hours he works, but must pay a 20% tax on his labor income. He has also an income of $40 from non-labor income source. How many hours will he choose to work? A) 4 B) 8 C) 10 D) 12 E) 16arrow_forward
- In the News: Sleep Rules Raise Trucking Costs The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) now monitors the sleep hours and practices of long-haul truck drivers. As of July 1, 2013, the FMCSA insists that drivers: Drive no more than 11 hours a day. Work no more than 14 hours a day. Work no more than 70 hours a week. Take a 30-minute break in their first 8 hours of driving. Rest for 34 consecutive hours after completing a 70-hour week, including at least two nights between the hours of 1 and 5 a.m. According to FMCSA, the new sleep rules will reduce chronic fatigue and related crashes, saving 19 lives per year. But the trucking industry says the new rules are too costly and even dangerous. They force drivers to sleep when they're not tired and to drive when they are tired. They also force trucks onto the road at commute times. The $700 billion industry says shipping costs will rise 2 to 6 percent, upward of $2 billion. Source: Federal Motor Carier Safety Administration and…arrow_forwardSuppose you earned $60,000 per year and pay taxes based on marginal tax rates. The first tax bracket which taxes at 10% ranges from zero dollars to $30,000. The second tax bracket which tax at 25% ranges from 30,001 to $120,000. How much will you pay in total taxes?arrow_forwardIf older workers have a tax elasticity of labor supply equal to 0.25, by how much will their work activity decline when they reach the Social Security earnings test limit? (Recall that the Social Security earnings test limit is 50 percent. Assume explicit taxes of 20 percent below that limit. Use the midpoint method.) Instructions: Enter your response as a positive percent rounded to one decimal place. Do not include a negative sign (-) with your answer.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning