LABOR ECONOMICS LOOSE PRINT UPGRADE
20th Edition
ISBN: 9781264115211
Author: BORJAS
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 4P
To determine
Determine the reservation wage.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
just subparts g and h
Akua gains utility from consumption C and leisure L. The most leisure she can consume in any given week is 110 hours. Her utility function is U (C, L) = C × L. Akua receives 660 GHS each week from her great-grandmother—regardless of how much she works. a. What will be Akua’s marginal rate of substitution. b. What will be Akua’s reservation wage? (Explain in detail)
Darla gets her utility from consumption C and leisure L. The most leisure she can consume in any given week is 110 hours. Her utility function is U(C, L) = C x L. This implies that Darla’s marginal rate of substitution is C / L Darla receives $750 each week from her grandparents–regardless of how much she works. What is Darla’s reservation wage?
Chapter 2 Solutions
LABOR ECONOMICS LOOSE PRINT UPGRADE
Ch. 2 - Prob. 1RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2RQCh. 2 - Prob. 3RQCh. 2 - Prob. 4RQCh. 2 - Prob. 5RQCh. 2 - Prob. 6RQCh. 2 - Prob. 7RQCh. 2 - Prob. 8RQCh. 2 - Prob. 9RQCh. 2 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 2 - Prob. 11RQCh. 2 - Prob. 12RQCh. 2 - Prob. 1PCh. 2 - Prob. 2PCh. 2 - Prob. 3PCh. 2 - Prob. 4PCh. 2 - Prob. 5PCh. 2 - Prob. 6PCh. 2 - Prob. 7PCh. 2 - Prob. 8PCh. 2 - Prob. 9PCh. 2 - Prob. 10PCh. 2 - A worker plans to retire at the age of 65, at...Ch. 2 - Prob. 12PCh. 2 - Prob. 13PCh. 2 - Prob. 14PCh. 2 - Prob. 15P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Winona has 80 hours to divide between leisure and labor. Her utility function is u(r,c) = f(r) + c, when r represents hours of leisure,c represents dollars of consumption, and f is strictly concave. Winona’s wage is w0= $15/hr. initially, then it rises to w1= $20/hr. (i) Explain what happens to Winona’s labor supply when the wage rises,and why. (ii) Explain how the answer to (i) would change if Winona were to win a lottery.arrow_forwardSuppose the wage you are being paid per hour doubles form $15 to $30. Would you decide to work more hours or fewer hours ? Is there an income and substitution effect involved in your decision about how many hours you choose to work? If so, what is being substituted for what?arrow_forwardSuppose that Linda receives a fixed payment of $50 and consumes 8 hours of leisure. If her total earnings for the entire day is $300, we know her hourly wage rate must be (there are 24 hours in a day)arrow_forward
- Rebecca's wage is $10 per hour, and she can work up to 60 hours per week. The table and the budget constraint graph show the trade-off that she faces between income and leisure in one week of potential work at this wage. Her manager raises her wage to $15 per hour. Change the graph below to illustrate her new income-leisure budget constraint. The line and the individual endpoints are movable. Assume that nothing else changes. Hours Leisure time Income ($) (hours) worked at $10/hour 0 200 400 600 0 20 40 60 60 40 20 0 Income ($) 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Leisure (hours)arrow_forwardLucille receives an annual salary of $37,500 based on a 37.5-hour workweek. What are her gross earnings for a two-week pay period in which she works 9 hours of overtime at 1 1/2 times her regular rate of pay? (Assume there are exactly 52 weeks in a year. Round your answer to the nearest cent.) Gross earnings =arrow_forwardSuppose that Boston consumers pay twice as much hours as she wants at a wage of w, chooses to work 10 hours a day. Her Boss decides to limit the number of hours that she can work to 8 hours per day. Show how her budget constraints and choice of hours change. Is she unambiguously worse off as a result of this change? Why?arrow_forward
- 4. Winona has 80 hours to divide between leisure and labor. Her utility function is u(r,c) = f(r) + c, when r represents hours of leisure, c represents dollars of consumption, and fis strictly concave. Winona's wage is wo = $15/hr. initially, then it rises to wi = $20/hr. (i) Explain what happens to Winona's labor supply when the wage rises, and why. (ii) Explain how the answer to (i) would change if Winona were to win a lottery.arrow_forward(Based on Chapter 2, Problem 1 of Benjamin et al., 2031) Amit has $2000 of annual non-labour income. He has 80 hours per week that he can allocate between labour and leisure, for 80 x 52 = 4160 hours per year. His current wage rate is $20 per hour and he chooses to work 2200 hours a year. (a) Draw a leisure - labour diagram, clearly indicating Amit's current labour supply decision. (Your diagram should be clearly labeled and include Amit's budget line and an indifferent curve showing his leisure and consumption of goods and services at his optimal choice. Use the figures provided to find the y-intercept and his consumption if he doesn't work.) (b) Amit's wage rate increases to $25 per hour. In response, he increases his labour supply to 2300 hours. If he were "compensated" accordingly, at this new wage rate he would be just indifferent to working 2200 hours at his original wage rate and working 2400 hours at the new wage. Illustrate Amit's new optimal choice. Use the information…arrow_forward(i) Keith’s marginal utility of leisure is C – 20 and his marginal utility of consumption is L – 50. There are 110 hours in the week available to split between work and leisure. Keith receives £250 of welfare payments each week regardless of how much he works (assume he spends all of his welfare payments on consumption). What is Keith’s reservation wage? (ii) Suppose Danny receives the same welfare payments each week as Keith and has the same number of available hours (110). However, Danny’s indifference curve is flatter than Keith’s. How would his reservation wage compare to Keith’s? Why?arrow_forward
- Edie chooses to work 90 hours per week when the wage rate is $16 per hour. If she is offered time-and-a-half ($24 per hour) for “overtime work” (i.e., hours in excess of 90 per week), will she choose to work longer hours? Support your results with a diagram.arrow_forwardEmma is employed at a contract where he can vary his labour supply between 0 and 40 hours per week. She derives utility from consumption, c, and leisure, L. Her preferences are represented by the following utility function: U(c,L) = min(c, L). The unit price of consumption is p, and the hourly wage rate is w. (a) Derive an expression for Emma's labour supply. (b) The government contemplates introducing a consumption boosting policy including a monthly transfer of money for which Emma is eligible. At what size of the transfer will Emma decide to not work? Assume that the unit price of consumption is 30 and the hourly wage rate is 50arrow_forwardSUBSTITUTION AND INCOME EFFECTS OF A WAGE INCREASE When the wage rate increases from $10 to $30 per hour, the worker's budget line shifts from PQ to RQ. In response, the worker moves from A to B while decreasing work hours from 8 to 5. The reduction in hours worked arises because the income effect outweighs the substitution effect. In this case, the supply of labor curve is backward bending. Income (dollars per day) 720 240 w= $30 w= $10 12 16 www. 19 Substitution Effect Income Effect Derive the graph into a backward bending labor supply curve Q 24 Hours of leisurearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning