Connect 1-Semester Access Card for Microeconomics
20th Edition
ISBN: 9780077660840
Author: Author
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 22, Problem 12DQ
To determine
Reason for exempting a firm’s contribution to its workers’ health insurance from taxation .
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Suppose that the price elasticity for hip replacement surgeries is 0.2. Further suppose that hip replacement surgeries are originally not covered by health insurance and that at a price of $50,000 each, 10,000 such surgeries are demanded each year. LO24.2 a. Suppose that health insurance begins to cover hip replacement surgeries and that everyone interested in getting a hip replacement has health insurance. If insurance covers 50 percent of the cost of the surgery, by what percentage would you expect the quantity demanded of hip replacements to increase? What if insurance covered 90 percent of the price? If insurance covers 50 percent of the bill, just assume that the price paid by consumers falls 50 percent.) b. Suppose that with insurance companies covering 90 percent of the price, the increase in demand leads to a jump in the price per hip surgery from $50,000 to $100,000. How much will each insured patient now pay for a hip replacement surgery? Compared to the original situation,…
Complete the accompanying table and answer the accompanying questions. (L01, LO6, LO7)
a. At what level of the control variable are net benefits maximized?
b. What is the relation between marginal benefit and marginal cost at this levelof the variable?
Control Variable Q
Total Benefits B(Q)
Total Cost C(Q)
Net Benefits N(Q)
Marginal Benefit MB(Q)
Marginal Cost MC(Q)
Marginal Cost MC(Q)
100
1200
950
60
101
1400
70
102
1590
80
103
1770
90
104
1940
100
105
2100
110
106
2250
120
107
2390
130
108
2520
140
109
2640
150
110
2750
160
Abdul’s utility function is given by U A 5 M A 2 y M B , where M A is Abdul’s wealth level and M B is Benjamin’s wealth level. Benjamin’s utility function is given by (LO1) U B 5 M B 2 y M A . Suppose M A 5 M B 5 10 initially, and suppose there is a joint project that Ab dul and Benjamin can undertake that will generate an additional 10 units of wealth to divide between them. The project is neither pleasant nor unpleasant. What is the minimum payment Abdul must be given to secure his agreement to perform the project? What is the minimum payment Benjamin must be given? Will they perform the project? (LO1)
Chapter 22 Solutions
Connect 1-Semester Access Card for Microeconomics
Ch. 22 - Prob. 1DQCh. 22 - Prob. 2DQCh. 22 - Prob. 3DQCh. 22 - Prob. 4DQCh. 22 - Prob. 5DQCh. 22 - Prob. 6DQCh. 22 - Prob. 7DQCh. 22 - Prob. 8DQCh. 22 - Prob. 9DQCh. 22 - Prob. 10DQ
Ch. 22 - Prob. 11DQCh. 22 - Prob. 12DQCh. 22 - Prob. 13DQCh. 22 - Prob. 14DQCh. 22 - Prob. 15DQCh. 22 - Prob. 16DQCh. 22 - Prob. 17DQCh. 22 - Prob. 18DQCh. 22 - Prob. 1RQCh. 22 - Prob. 2RQCh. 22 - Prob. 3RQCh. 22 - Prob. 4RQCh. 22 - Prob. 5RQCh. 22 - Prob. 6RQCh. 22 - Prob. 7RQCh. 22 - Prob. 1PCh. 22 - Prob. 2PCh. 22 - Prob. 3P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose a two-person household. Person 1 has h1 units of time available and takes l1 units of leisure time, and person 2 has h2 units of time available and takes l2 units of leisure time. Collectively, the two persons in the household care about their total consumption c, and their total leisure l=l1+l2, and they have preferences over their total consumption and total leisure just as specified in the course. But person 1 faces a market wage w1, and person 2 faces a market wage w2, with w1 > w2. 1) Draw the budget constraint faced by the two-person household. What will the household do, that is, how much does each household member work? 2) What happens if w2 rises? (w1 > w2 still holds) 3) Explain your results and interpretarrow_forwardonly typed answer Suppose that the market demand for medical care is summarized by the demand function: Qd = 100-2p and the market supply is summarized by the supply function: Qs= =20+2p (1) Calculate the equilibrium quantity and price, assuming no health insurance is available. (2) Suppose that health insurance is made available that provides for a 20 percent coinsurance rate. Calculate the new equilibrium price and quantity. (Hint: How does the demand curve shift?) (3) Calculate the deadweight loss due to this insurance.arrow_forwardIf the tax code exempts the first $20,000 of income from taxation and then taxes 25 percent of all income above that level, then a person who earns percent and a marginal tax rate of $50,000 has an average tax rate of percent. O 15, 25 O 25, 15 O 25, 30 O 30, 25arrow_forward
- assume there are two types of workers, low- and high-ability, and let 0 = 0.25 be the proportion of high-ability workers in the population. Assume their marginal productivity and, therefore, their wages are wh = $20 and wl = $16, and that both types can use college education to signal high ability. The cost of college education for low-ability workers is cl = $5 whereas the cost for high-ability workers is ch = $2. How much do firms pay to each worker type when they cannot differentiate them? (a) wh = $20 and wl = $16 (b) wh = $2 and wl = $5 (c) w = $17 (d) w = $18arrow_forwardWealth, earnings, and disposable income are just three of several ways of looking at inequality. Imagine a household that earns $80,000 per year from labor. In that year, it also receives an income of $3,000 from investments, pays $12,000 in tax, and receives $7,000 in transfers from the state. Which of the following is its market income and its disposable income? O $83,000; $71,000. O $83,000 $78,000. O $80,000; $68,000. O $80,000; $75,000. Jarrow_forward-Ben has named Jerry as primary beneficiary of Ben's life insurance policy and Tom as the contingent beneficiary. In which of the following ways do the rights of Jerry differ from the rights of Tom? - -If Jerry is living when Ben dies, Tom has no legal right to any of the life insurance lump-sum death proceeds. -The only circumstances under which Tom would have any legal right to the lump-sum death proceeds would be if Jerry predeceases Ben. -a.1 Only -b.2 Only -c.Both 1 and 2arrow_forward
- How do you draw a health production function with individuals receiving some health producing intervention as inputs and health benefits as outputs that shows declining returns in output. What does “declining returns” imply about the marginal health benefit per person served/treated along this production function? How does this relate to “specialization of inputs”? How about “selection to treatment”? If we assume that you have two distinct means of producing health (programs A & B) with identical PFs as you drew above. Given a fixed amount of inputs (e.g. ability to treat/serve some number of individuals), draw the production possibilities frontier curve for these two programs. What is an opportunity cost and how does it relate to the PPF curve? If our value the health benefits from both programs equally, what point (label as X) do you pick on the PPF curve and why? Suppose program A works best for children, and program B best for adults, and you value health…arrow_forwardNewfoundland’s fishing industry has recently declined sharply due to overfish- ing, even though fishing companies were supposedly bound by a quota agree- ment. If all fishermen had abided by the agreement, yields could have been maintained at high levels. LO4 Model this situation as a prisoner’s dilemma in which the players are Company A and Company B and the strategies are to keep the quota and break the quota. Include appropriate payoffs in the matrix. Explain why overfishing is inevitable in the absence of effective enforcement of the quota agreement. Provide another environmental example of a prisoner’s dilemma. In many potential prisoner’s dilemmas, a way out of the dilemma for a would-be cooperator is to make reliable character judgments about the trustworthiness of potential partners. Explain why this solution is not avail- able in many situations involving degradation of the environment.arrow_forwardApproximately how many people are employed in the federal bureaucracy? O 1 million-1.4 million O 1.5 million -1.7 million O2 million-2.4 million O 2.5 million - 3 millionarrow_forward
- Preventive care is not always cost-effective. Suppose that it costs $100 per person to administer a screening exam for a particular disease. Also suppose that if the screening exam finds the disease, the early detection given by the exam will avert $1,000 of costly future treatment. a. Imagine giving the screening test to 100 people. How much will it cost to give those 100 tests? Imagine a case in which 15 percent of those receiving the screening exam test positive. How much in future costly treatments will be averted? How much is saved by setting up a screening system? b. Imagine that everything is the same as in part a except that now only 5 percent of those receiving the screening exam test positive. In this case, how much in future costly treatments will be averted? How much is lost by setting up a screening system?arrow_forward7. Oster (2020) “Health Recommendations and Selection in Health Behaviors” which found that spurious links between health behaviours and good health outcomes can be self-reinforcing if individuals who engage follow the recommendation also engage in other positive health behaviours. a) Briefly describe in your own (layperson) words what this implies about false positive findings and null findings. b) Can you think of an example where the opposite is true? That is, individuals who follow the recommendation also engage in negative health behaviors. c) Suppose a medical examiner (coroner) is deciding the cause of death of a recently deceased patient. The patient overdosed and is unclear whether the overdose was accidental or intentional (i.e., suicide). The medical examiner remembers hearing on the news that morning that suicides have been rising in recent years. What does this imply about the likely cause of death the medical examiner will record on the death certificate? What does this…arrow_forwardTeletronics reported record profits of $100,000 last year and is on track to exceed those profits this year. Teletronics competes in a very competitive market where many of the firms are merging in an attempt to gain competitive advantages. Currently, the company’s top manager is compensated with a fixed salary that does not include any performance bonuses. Explain why this manager might nonetheless have a strong incentive to maximize the firm’s profits. (LO4, LO5)arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education