![Physics for Scientists and Engineers](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781429281843/9781429281843_largeCoverImage.jpg)
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781429281843
Author: Tipler
Publisher: MAC HIGHER
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 22, Problem 64P
To determine
The minimum radius of the sphere without dielectric breakdown.
Expert Solution & Answer
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution![Blurred answer](/static/blurred-answer.jpg)
Students have asked these similar questions
If the magnitude of an electric field in air is as great as 3.00×106 N/C, the air becomes ionized and begins to conduct electricity. This phenomenon is called dielectric breakdown. A charge of 27.8 μC is to be placed on a conducting sphere. What is the minimum radius of a sphere that can hold this charge without breakdown?
When the electric field in air exceeds a value of EDB = 3*10^6V/m (the dielectric strength), dielectric breakdown occurs and the air becomes ionized. If the electric field at
the surface of a conductor exceeds this value, the ionization of the air will remove charge from the conductor until the electric field no longer exceeds 3*10^6V/m. What is
the maximum charge that can be held on a conducting sphere in air in terms of the sphere's radius R and the dielectric strength of air EDB? (in terms, no specific numbers)
A conducting sphere with a radius of 17 cm is charged to 68V relative to V = 0 at r = 0o. What is the
surface charge density o on the surface of the sphere?
(E0 = 8.85 x 10 1ºC² /(Nm²))
Select one:
o = 4.00 x 10 °C/m2
o = 2.95 x 10 8C/m²
o = 3.54 x 10 C/m²
o = 3.77 x 10 ®C/m²
Chapter 22 Solutions
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Ch. 22 - Prob. 1PCh. 22 - Prob. 2PCh. 22 - Prob. 3PCh. 22 - Prob. 4PCh. 22 - Prob. 5PCh. 22 - Prob. 6PCh. 22 - Prob. 7PCh. 22 - Prob. 8PCh. 22 - Prob. 9PCh. 22 - Prob. 10P
Ch. 22 - Prob. 11PCh. 22 - Prob. 12PCh. 22 - Prob. 13PCh. 22 - Prob. 14PCh. 22 - Prob. 15PCh. 22 - Prob. 16PCh. 22 - Prob. 17PCh. 22 - Prob. 18PCh. 22 - Prob. 20PCh. 22 - Prob. 21PCh. 22 - Prob. 22PCh. 22 - Prob. 23PCh. 22 - Prob. 24PCh. 22 - Prob. 25PCh. 22 - Prob. 26PCh. 22 - Prob. 27PCh. 22 - Prob. 28PCh. 22 - Prob. 29PCh. 22 - Prob. 30PCh. 22 - Prob. 31PCh. 22 - Prob. 32PCh. 22 - Prob. 33PCh. 22 - Prob. 34PCh. 22 - Prob. 35PCh. 22 - Prob. 36PCh. 22 - Prob. 37PCh. 22 - Prob. 38PCh. 22 - Prob. 39PCh. 22 - Prob. 40PCh. 22 - Prob. 41PCh. 22 - Prob. 42PCh. 22 - Prob. 43PCh. 22 - Prob. 44PCh. 22 - Prob. 45PCh. 22 - Prob. 46PCh. 22 - Prob. 47PCh. 22 - Prob. 48PCh. 22 - Prob. 49PCh. 22 - Prob. 50PCh. 22 - Prob. 51PCh. 22 - Prob. 52PCh. 22 - Prob. 53PCh. 22 - Prob. 54PCh. 22 - Prob. 55PCh. 22 - Prob. 56PCh. 22 - Prob. 57PCh. 22 - Prob. 58PCh. 22 - Prob. 59PCh. 22 - Prob. 60PCh. 22 - Prob. 61PCh. 22 - Prob. 62PCh. 22 - Prob. 63PCh. 22 - Prob. 64PCh. 22 - Prob. 65PCh. 22 - Prob. 66PCh. 22 - Prob. 67PCh. 22 - Prob. 68PCh. 22 - Prob. 69PCh. 22 - Prob. 70PCh. 22 - Prob. 71PCh. 22 - Prob. 72PCh. 22 - Prob. 73PCh. 22 - Prob. 74PCh. 22 - Prob. 75PCh. 22 - Prob. 76PCh. 22 - Prob. 77PCh. 22 - Prob. 78PCh. 22 - Prob. 79PCh. 22 - Prob. 80PCh. 22 - Prob. 81PCh. 22 - Prob. 82PCh. 22 - Prob. 83PCh. 22 - Prob. 84PCh. 22 - Prob. 85PCh. 22 - Prob. 86PCh. 22 - Prob. 87PCh. 22 - Prob. 88P
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Is it possible for a conducting sphere of radius 0.10 m to hold a charge of 4.0 C in air? The minimum field required to break down air and turn it into a conductor is 3.0 106 N/C.arrow_forwardMost workers in nanotechnology are actively monitored for excess static charge buildup. The human body acts like an insulator as one walks across a carpet, collecting −50 nC per step. What charge buildup will a worker in a manufacturing plant accumulate if she walks 17 steps?arrow_forwardMost workers in nanotechnology are actively monitored for excess static charge buildup. The human body acts like an insulator as one walks across a carpet, collecting −50 nC per step. What charge buildup will a worker in a manufacturing plant accumulate if she walks 29 steps? charge buildup from 29 steps: IMPORTANT: I was told the answer is not -1450 nCarrow_forward
- Suppose a capacitor consists of two coaxial thin cylindrical conductors. The inner cylinder of radius ra has a charge of +Q, while the outer cylinder of radius rb has charge -Q. The electric field E at a radial distance r from the central axis is given by the function: E = αe-r/a0 + β/r + b0 where alpha (α), beta (β), a0 and b0 are constants. Find an expression for its capacitance. First, let us derive the potential difference Vab between the two conductors. The potential difference is related to the electric field by: First, let us derive the potential difference Vab between the two conductors. The potential difference is related to the electric field by: Calculating the antiderivative or indefinite integral , Vab = (-αa0e-r/a0 + β + b0 ) By definition, the capacitance C is related to the charge and potential difference by: C = / Evaluating with the upper and lower limits of integration for Vab, then simplifying: C = Q / ( (e-rb/a0 - e-ra/a0) + β ln() + b0 () )arrow_forwardProblem 7: You are told that in a thundercloud, a 1 g raindrop can acquire a charge of 1.5 mC. Part (a) Assume that two such raindrops are separated by 4.8 cm. What is the acceleration, in meters per square second, of each raindrop away from each other? Part (b) The numbers provided seem to be reasonable - why should you not believe the source of this information? The raindrops would not stay at a constant distance from each other, so this situation would never occur. The acceleration is far too large. The acceleration is far too small. Raindrops are not this size. Part (c) Which premise or assumption is responsible for the error? The raindrop is too large. The mass is too small for a raindrop. The mass is too large for a raindrop. The assumed charges of the raindrops are too large. The assumed charge of the raindrops are too small. None of these.arrow_forwardSuppose a capacitor consists of two coaxial thin cylindrical conductors. The inner cylinder of radius ra has a charge of +Q, while the outer cylinder of radius rb has charge -Q. The electric field E at a radial distance r from the central axis is given by the function: E = αe-r/a0 + β/r + b0 where alpha (α), beta (β), a0 and b0 are constants. Find an expression for its capacitance. First, let us derive the potential difference Vab between the two conductors. The potential difference is related to the electric field by:arrow_forward
- Suppose a capacitor consists of two coaxial thin cylindrical conductors. The inner cylinder of radius ra has a charge of +Q, while the outer cylinder of radius rb has charge -Q. The electric field E at a radial distance r from the central axis is given by the function: E = αe-r/a0 + β/r + b0 where alpha (α), beta (β), a0 and b0 are constants. Find an expression for its capacitance.arrow_forwardSuppose a capacitor consists of two coaxial thin cylindrical conductors. The inner cylinder of radius ra has a charge of +Q, while the outer cylinder of radius rb has charge -Q. The electric field E at a radial distance r from the central axis is given by the function: E = αe-r/a0 + β/r + b0 where alpha (α), beta (β), a0 and b0 are constants. Find an expression for its capacitance. First, let us derive the potential difference Vab between the two conductors. The potential difference is related to the electric field by: Calculating the antiderivative or indefinite integral , Vab = (-αa0e-r/a0 + β + b0 ) By definition, the capacitance C is related to the charge and potential difference by: C = / Evaluating with the upper and lower limits of integration for Vab, then simplifying: C = Q / ( (e-rb/a0 - e-ra/a0) + β ln() + b0 () )arrow_forwardA metal sphere of radius R=2.0 cm is suspended from the ceiling by an insulating rope. A point sphere with q=-3.OnC charge is fixed to the ground 3.0m below the center of the sphere. What could be the highest tensile force that can occur in the rope when the metal sphere begins to be charged with an electrical charge? (The electric field to ionize the air is 5x104 V/m.)arrow_forward
- Two small insulating spheres with radius 3.00×10−2 m are separated by a large center-to-center distance of 0.545 m . One sphere is negatively charged, with net charge -1.40 μC , and the other sphere is positively charged, with net charge 4.20 μC . The charge is uniformly distributed within the volume of each sphere. What is the magnitude E of the electric field midway between the spheres? Take the permittivity of free space to be ϵ0 = 8.85×10−12 C^2/(N⋅m^2)arrow_forwardSuppose a capacitor consists of two coaxial thin cylindrical conductors. The inner cylinder of radius ra has a charge of +Q, while the outer cylinder of radius rb has charge -Q. The electric field E at a radial distance r from the central axis is given by the function: E = αe-r/a0 + β/r + b0arrow_forwardProblem 7: You are told that in a thundercloud, a 0.65 g raindrop can acquire a charge of 1.1 mC Part (a) Assume that two such raindrops are separated by 4.2 cm. What is the acceleration, in meters per square second, of each raindrop away from each other? Part (b) The numbers provided seem to be reasonable - why should you not believe the source of this information? The acceleration is far too small. The acceleration is far too large. The raindrops would not stay at a constant distance from each other, so this situation would never occur. Raindrops are not this size. Part (c) Which premise or assumption is responsible for the error? The mass is too small for a raindrop. The mass is too large for a raindrop. The assumed charges of the raindrops are too large. The assumed charge of the raindrops are too small. The raindrop is too large. None of these.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781938168000Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger HinrichsPublisher:OpenStax CollegePhysics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781938168000/9781938168000_smallCoverImage.gif)
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781938168000
Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger Hinrichs
Publisher:OpenStax College
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781133939146/9781133939146_smallCoverImage.gif)
Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...
Physics
ISBN:9781133939146
Author:Katz, Debora M.
Publisher:Cengage Learning
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781133104261/9781133104261_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based Text
Physics
ISBN:9781133104261
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Electric Fields: Crash Course Physics #26; Author: CrashCourse;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdulzEfQXDE;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY