The claim for a benefit under BLBA was filed by the widow of a person, DC who died of lung cancer. The benefits under the BLBA can be taken only when the widow is able to prove that the exposure to the coal dust was a substantial factor for the death of DC. The person, DC worked at a coal mine but he has been a smoker for a long time. The physician during the benefits hearing testified that the death was caused by coal dust. The Court granted the benefits. To find: The judgment of the appellant court in the case.

Question

Stephen Glass made himself infamous as a dishonest journalist by fabricating material for more than forty articles for The New Republic and other publications. At the time, he was a law student at Georgetown University. Once suspicions were aroused, Glass tried to avoid detection. Later, Glass applied for admission to the California bar. The California Supreme Court denied his application, citing “numerous instances of dishonesty” during his “rehabilitation” following the exposure of his misdeeds. How do these circumstances underscore the importance of ethics?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 23, Problem 5BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The claim for a benefit under BLBA was filed by the widow of a person, DC who died of lung cancer. The benefits under the BLBA can be taken only when the widow is able to prove that the exposure to the coal dust was a substantial factor for the death of DC. The person, DC worked at a coal mine but he has been a smoker for a long time. The physician during the benefits hearing testified that the death was caused by coal dust. The Court granted the benefits.

To find:The judgment of the appellant court in the case.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Stephen Glass made himself infamous as a dishonest journalist by fabricating material for more than forty articles for The New Republic and other publications. At the time, he was a law student at Georgetown University. Once suspicions were aroused, Glass tried to avoid detection. Later, Glass applied for admission to the California bar. The California Supreme Court denied his application, citing “numerous instances of dishonesty” during his “rehabilitation” following the exposure of his misdeeds. How do these circumstances underscore the importance of ethics?

Ellen, a citizen of California, was seriously injured in an automobile accident while driving in California. She was injured due to the negligence of Sara, a citizen of Arizona, who ran a red light at an intersection. Ellen is seeking 1.5 million in damages. 1. Where may Ellen bring her suit? 2. Discuss the process Ellen would have to follow in order to fully litigate her claim. 3. If Sara is granted summary judgment at the trial court level, what may Ellen do next? Explain her options.

Business Case Problem with Sample Answer—Determining Employee Status. Nelson Ovalles workedas a cable installer for Cox Rhode Island Telecom,LLC, under an agreement with a third party,M&M Communications, Inc. the agreementstated that no employer-employee relationshipexisted between Cox and M&M’s technicians, includingOvalles. Ovalles was required to designate his aliation withCox on his work van, clothing, and identication badge. Coxhad minimal contact with him, however, and had limitedpower to control how he performed his duties. Cox suppliedcable wire and similar items, but the equipment was delivered to M&M, not to Ovalles. On a workday, while Ovalleswas fullling a work order, his van rear-ended a car driven byBarbara Cayer. Is Cox liable to Cayer? Explain. [Cayer v. CoxRhode Island Telecom, LLC, 85 A.3d 1140 (R.I. 2014)] (SeeAgency Law.)