Subpart (a):
The preventive health care cost effectiveness.
Subpart (a):
Answer to Problem 3P
The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000. The total future medical expense averted is $15,000. The medical expense saved after setting up of the screening system is $5,000.
Explanation of Solution
The preventive health care measures are those medical precautionary measures which help the people to stay healthy and free from diseases. The screening system helps the people to easily identify and detect various diseases in their early stages which will help them to treat the diseases easily and affordably without much hassle.
The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:
Thus, the total expense of 100 screening tests is $10,000.
The given percentage of persons having the test result positive is 15%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:
Thus, there will be 15 persons having the positive results from the screening test.
The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense that can be saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:
Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $15,000.
The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $15,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:
Thus, the net medical expense saved after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is $5,000.
Concept introduction:
Preventive health care: They are the measures taken in order to prevent the occurrence of a disease rather than treatment of a disease.
Sub part (b):
The net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of screening test.
Sub part (b):
Answer to Problem 3P
The total cost of 100 tests is $10,000. The total future medical expense averted is $5,000. The medical expense lost after setting up of the screening system is -$5,000.
Explanation of Solution
The cost of one screening test is $100 according to the given information and the number of persons taking the screening test is 100. Thus, the total cost of taking the medical screening test can be calculated by multiplying the cost per screening test with the total number of persons taking the screening test as follows:
Thus, the total expense for 100 screening tests is $10,000.
The given percentage of persons having the test result as positive is 5%. Thus, the total number of persons having positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the total number of persons with the given percentage as follows:
Thus, there will be 5 persons having the positive results from the screening test.
The amount of the future medical expense saved by the individual when the test result is positive is $1,000. Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the people having the positive test results can be calculated by multiplying the per person medical expense saved with the total number of persons having positive test results as follows:
Thus, the total future medical expense saved by the persons having the positive test results is $5,000.
The cost of setting up the screening system is $10,000 and the total future medical expense saved is $5,000. Thus, the net future medical expense saved can be calculated by subtracting the cost of setting up the screening system from the total medical expense saved as follows:
Since the result is having a negative sign, it shows that the expense of setting up the screening system is higher than the benefit received from the use of the screening system. Thus, the net result is a loss. Thus, the net medical expense loss after reducing the cost of setting up the screening test is -$5,000.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 24 Solutions
ECONOMICS W/CONNECT+20 >C<
- Suppose that the price elasticity for hip replacement surgeries is 0.2. Further suppose that hip replacement surgeries are originally not covered by health insurance and that at a price of $50,000 each, 10,000 such surgeries are demanded each year. LO24.2 a. Suppose that health insurance begins to cover hip replacement surgeries and that everyone interested in getting a hip replacement has health insurance. If insurance covers 50 percent of the cost of the surgery, by what percentage would you expect the quantity demanded of hip replacements to increase? What if insurance covered 90 percent of the price? If insurance covers 50 percent of the bill, just assume that the price paid by consumers falls 50 percent.) b. Suppose that with insurance companies covering 90 percent of the price, the increase in demand leads to a jump in the price per hip surgery from $50,000 to $100,000. How much will each insured patient now pay for a hip replacement surgery? Compared to the original situation,…arrow_forwardAtl Econ J (2013) 41:8991DOI 10.1007/s11293-012-9342-2ANTHOLOGYSocial Capital and Income Inequality in the UnitedStatesRati RamPublished online: 17 October 2012# International Atlantic Economic Society 2012Many scholars have explored in recent years various correlates and consequences ofsocial capital along with discussions of the concept. For example, relationship ofsocial capital with population happiness, health, income, economic growth, andhuman development has been researched by several scholars. However, very fewstudies have considered the relationship between social capital and income inequality.One exception to that is the recent work by Robison et al. (Journal of SocioEconomics, 2011) which proposed a theoretical link between social capital andincome distribution and conducted an empirical exploration for the U.S. states forthe census years 1980, 1990, and 2000. Their key measure of social capital wassomewhat narrowly focused on percent of households headed by a single female…arrow_forwardThe biggest difference between the United States and Beveridge OR Bismarck counties' health systems is: O a. The US has longer life expectancy for higher income people O b. The US permits/tolerates tens of millions of its citizens to be uninsured O. The US does more health technology assessment before utilization than other countries The US enjoys spending a higher percentage of its GDP on health care, it is a voluntary choice that reflects preferences for health care over other goods and services Od.arrow_forward
- 13 Secondhand smoke L Assume that the daily demand for packs of cigarettes in the tobacco-addicted nation of Pcoria is Q=100 – P Further assume that the marginal cost of producing a pack of cigarettes is $6, and that the market for cigarettes is perfectly competitive. Assume that each pack of cigarettes smoked does §6 worth of health damage to the smoker in the form of increased cancer risk and a total of $5 worth of health damage to the smoker's neighbors via secondhand smoke. Finally, assume that all Pcorian cigarette consumers are aware of these costs. a Assume that a Pcorian smoker named Jay states that he is willing to buy a pack of cigarettes for $8, but not a penny more. In this market, where the price is $6 per pack, what are the private benefits and private costs incurred whenever he buys a pack of cigarettes? Is it privately efficient for him to buy a pack of cigarettes at this price? b What about the public benefits and public costs? Is it socially efficient for him to buy a…arrow_forwardSuppose you are a politician being criticized in a debate for your commitment to reducing the growth of medical spending. Which of the following is the most appropriate response? O a. There is empirical evidence that medical spending should be capped at 15 percent of GDP. O b. Reducing wasteful health care spending could provide additional funding to the education sector. O c. High health care spending is harmful to bur economic well-being. O d. Fixing treatment prices will lead to greater innovation. Oe. Other developed nations spend far less of their GDP on health care.arrow_forward. The health authorities are considering the treatmentalternatives for three types of diseases: heart disease,cancer, and infectious disease. Each year there are10,000 new cases of heart disease, 10,000 new casesof cancer, and 5,000 new cases of infectious disease.For each diagnosis, there are a number of mutuallyindependent treatment alternatives (including notreatment) as shown in the following table. a. Identify all dominant treatment alternatives.Explain why each is dominant.b. Calculate the incremental cost, incrementalQALYs, and ICERs for all economicallyrational strategies (ICER 5 incremental cost/incremental QALYs). Why are these consideredeconomically rational?c. Using separate graphs for heart disease, cancer,and infectious disease, show the alternativetreatment options, label the dominant options,and show the economically feasible alternatives.(Place QALYs on the vertical axis and cost pertreatment on the horizontal axis.)d. The local health district has asked your opinion…arrow_forward
- Jackie moved to Spain to work for a public relations firm. She had health insurance from herprevious employer, but she was surprised to learn that her new employer in Spain did notoffer healthcare coverage. When she asked about this, she was told that more than 90percent of Spaniards use the public healthcare system, which was mostly free. However,her new employer did provide supplementary private health insurance that would allow herto receive quicker care from a private hospital if she desired.Jackie learned that she would be paying 4.7 percent of her salary and her employerwould pay 23.6 percent of her salary to the government for health insurance. She was given a Tarjeta Sanitaria Individual health card to prove that she had health insurance. With this,she could get free care at public hospitals and doctors’ offices. However, before seeing adoctor, she would need to register with a local primary care physician and decide whethershe would use public or private payment. If she needed…arrow_forwardJackie moved to Spain to work for a public relations firm. She had health insurance from herprevious employer, but she was surprised to learn that her new employer in Spain did notoffer healthcare coverage. When she asked about this, she was told that more than 90percent of Spaniards use the public healthcare system, which was mostly free. However,her new employer did provide supplementary private health insurance that would allow herto receive quicker care from a private hospital if she desired.Jackie learned that she would be paying 4.7 percent of her salary and her employerwould pay 23.6 percent of her salary to the government for health insurance. She was given a Tarjeta Sanitaria Individual health card to prove that she had health insurance. With this,she could get free care at public hospitals and doctors’ offices. However, before seeing adoctor, she would need to register with a local primary care physician and decide whethershe would use public or private payment. If she needed…arrow_forwardAssume that health insurance is private in a country, and the market for insurance is competitive. The figure below shows the marginal benefit and willingness and ability to pay curve. Premium (thousands of dollars per year) 30 million. 40 million. 10 million. 20 million. 12 O 10 CO 6 2 O 10 D = MB 50 20 30 40 Quantity (millions of families insured) Suppose that the marginal social benefit of insurance exceeds the willingness and ability to pay by a constant $2,000 per family per year. Suppose the marginal cost of health insurance is a constant $8,000 a year. What is the efficient quantity of health insurance policies?arrow_forward
- Consider a population of 500 families. 300 have private insurance, 100 have Medicaid, and 100 are uninsured. Suppose that Medicaid expands eligibility, and now the 100 uninsured families are now all eligible for Medicaid coverage. After one year, we see that 275 families have private insurance, 175 have Medicaid, and 50 are uninsured. In this case, the private insurance crowd-out rate associated with Medicaid expansion is what percent?arrow_forwardSuppose, if ill, that Fred’s demand for health services is summarized by the demand curve Q = 50 − 2P , where P is the price of services. How many services does he buy at a price of $20? Suppose that Fred’s probability of illness is 0.25. What is the actuarially fair price of health insurance for Fred with a zero coinsurance rate? If the insurance company pays Fred’s entire loss, will the insurance company offer him insurance at the actuarially fair rate? Why? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardHow do you draw a health production function with individuals receiving some health producing intervention as inputs and health benefits as outputs that shows declining returns in output. What does “declining returns” imply about the marginal health benefit per person served/treated along this production function? How does this relate to “specialization of inputs”? How about “selection to treatment”? If we assume that you have two distinct means of producing health (programs A & B) with identical PFs as you drew above. Given a fixed amount of inputs (e.g. ability to treat/serve some number of individuals), draw the production possibilities frontier curve for these two programs. What is an opportunity cost and how does it relate to the PPF curve? If our value the health benefits from both programs equally, what point (label as X) do you pick on the PPF curve and why? Suppose program A works best for children, and program B best for adults, and you value health…arrow_forward