MODIFIED MASTERING BIOLOGY WITH PEARSO
11th Edition
ISBN: 9780134447292
Author: Urry
Publisher: PEARSON EDUCATION (COLLEGE)
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 26.2, Problem 1CC
Decide whether each of the following pairs of structures more likely represents analogy or homology, and explain your reasoning: (a) a porcupine's quills and a cactus's spines; (b) a cat's paw and a human's hand; (c) an owl's wing and a hornet's wing.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Based on the picture, What function do the butterfly and bat wing structures share? How do these structures differ? Give atleast two (2) specific differences. Do these animals share any structural similarities inside their wings that would suggest they are closely related?
Why aren't wind turbine blades with tubercles inspired from the humpback whale flippers more used compared to comventional blades? Please cite a scientific source.
Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion
Based on their anatomical and behavioral differences, biologists previously placed humans and chimpanzees in different families, but now DNA sequence data suggest that they are closely related and should be placed in the same family. What are some advantages of using DNA sequences to decide how to classify organisms? What might be some disadvantages?
Chapter 26 Solutions
MODIFIED MASTERING BIOLOGY WITH PEARSO
Ch. 26.1 - VISUAL SKILLS: Which levels of the classification...Ch. 26.1 - Prob. 2CCCh. 26.1 - DRAW IT The bear family (Ursidae) is more closety...Ch. 26.2 - Decide whether each of the following pairs of...Ch. 26.2 - Prob. 2CCCh. 26.3 - Prob. 1CCCh. 26.3 - Prob. 2CCCh. 26.3 - WHAT IF? Draw a phylogenetic tree that includes...Ch. 26.4 - Explain how comparing proteins of two species can...Ch. 26.4 - WHAT IF? Suppose gene A is orthologous in species...
Ch. 26.4 - Prob. 3CCCh. 26.5 - What is a molecular clock? What assumption...Ch. 26.5 - Prob. 2CCCh. 26.5 - WHAT IF? Suppose a molecular dock dates the...Ch. 26.6 - Why is the kingdom Monera no longer considered a...Ch. 26.6 - Prob. 2CCCh. 26.6 - MAKE CONNECTIONS Explain how the origin of...Ch. 26 - Humans and chimpanzees are sister species. Explain...Ch. 26 - Why is it necessary to distinguish homology from...Ch. 26 - Prob. 26.3CRCh. 26 - When reconstructing phylogenies, is it more useful...Ch. 26 - Prob. 26.5CRCh. 26 - Prob. 26.6CRCh. 26 - In a comparison of birds and mammals, the...Ch. 26 - To appiy parsimony to constructing a phylogenetic...Ch. 26 - VISUAL SKILLS In Figure 26.4, which similarly...Ch. 26 - Three living species X, Y, and Z share a common...Ch. 26 - VISUAL SKILLS Based on the tree below, which...Ch. 26 - If you were using cladistics to build a...Ch. 26 - VISUAL SKILLS The relative lengths of the frog and...Ch. 26 - EVOLUTION CONNECTION Darwin suggested looking at a...Ch. 26 - SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY DRAW IT (a) Draw a...Ch. 26 - WRITE ABOUT A THEME: INFORMATION In a Short essay...Ch. 26 - SYNTHESIZE YOUR KNOWLEDGE This West Indian manatee...
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- please see I selected the correct choices for 1-3 in case I have not I will list their options 1 options: -jointed appendages -soft fleshy appendages -no appendages 2 options: -two pairs of antennae -no antennae -one pair of antennae 3 options: -wings -no wings 4 options: -crustacean -chelicerate -insectarrow_forwardMorphological analogs are structures having similar functions but different origins. For example, the wing of an airplane and a wing of a bird are analogous but certainly have different origins. Name and explain the comparisons of THREE ideas that humans have borrowed from plants and animals to use in building structures and making materials.arrow_forwardMany snakes and monitor lizards are venomous. What would you need to know to be able to decide whether this is a case of homology or analogy?arrow_forward
- You are presented two mammal skulls (not skeletons) you have not seen before. What traits would you look for to determine if either is a primate or not, and what do these traits look like in a primate?arrow_forwardIn a comparison of birds and mammals,the condition of having four limbs is(A) a shared ancestral character.(B) a shared derived character.(C) a character useful for distinguishing birdsfrom mammals.(D) an example of analogy rather than homology.arrow_forwardWhy is morphological convergence not a good explanation for vertebrate forelimbs?arrow_forward
- Radiometric dating and the cranial capacity measurements are back from the paleolab for the specimen you discovered at the site you were excavating in South Africa. Lab results indicate that the cranial capacity is 520 cubic centimeters and it dates to about 1.5 million years ago. After having identified the cranial traits present, you can now take this new information and provide, at least, the genus to which you think it may belong. Based on this information, choose from the options below, the category to which you think it most likely belongs. Group of answer choices Pre-australopith Premodern Human Gracile Australopithecine Early Genus Homo Robust Australopithecine Late Genus Homoarrow_forwardRadiometric dating and the cranial capacity measurements are back from the paleolab for the specimen you discovered at the site you were excavating in South Africa. Lab results indicate that the cranial capacity is 520 cubic centimeters and it dates to about 1.5 million years ago. After having identified the cranial traits present, you can now take this new information and provide, at least, the genus to which you think it may belong. Based on this information, choose from the options below, the category to which you think it most likely belongs. -Pre-australopith -Premodern Human -Gracile Australopithecine -Early Genus Homo -Robust Australopithecine -Late Genus Homoarrow_forwardAre the limbs modified into wings of bats and the wings of birds examples of evolutionary analogy or homology? What about whale fins compared to fish fins?arrow_forward
- Which of the following are homologous structures? Select all that apply. a skeleton of a shark and skeleton of a dolphin b wings of a butterfly and wings of a bat c wings of a butterfly and wings of a dragonfly d forelimbs of humans and bats e leaves of a Venus flytrap and leaves of a poinsettiaarrow_forwardRadiometric dating and the cranial capacity measurements are back from the paleolab for the specimen your friend at the museum called you about. She calls again to tell you the results. The cranial capacity is 442 cubic centimeters and it dates to 3 million years ago. After having identified the cranial traits present, you can now take this new information and provide, at least, the genus you think it could belong to in order to help your friend. Based on this information, choose from the options below, the category to which you think it most likely belongs. Group of answer choices Robust Australopithecine early Genus Homo Pre-Australopith Late Genus Homo Gracile Australopithecine Premodernarrow_forwardThere are two main groups of bats: Smaller “microbats” navigate by using sonar, and larger “megabats” rely on vision. Mammalogists once though that both kinds of bats evolve from insectivorous mammals. But similarities between the visual systems of megabats and primates have led some researchers to think that megabats may have evolve from primates, perhaps lemurs. What results would support the hypothesis that the two groups of bats have a common origin? Separate origins?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)BiologyISBN:9780134580999Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. HoehnPublisher:PEARSON
Biology 2eBiologyISBN:9781947172517Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann ClarkPublisher:OpenStax
Anatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781259398629Author:McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa StouterPublisher:Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)BiologyISBN:9780815344322Author:Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter WalterPublisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781260159363Author:Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, CynthiaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)BiologyISBN:9781260231700Author:Sylvia S. Mader, Michael WindelspechtPublisher:McGraw Hill Education
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:9780134580999
Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:9781947172517
Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:9781259398629
Author:McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Biology
ISBN:9780815344322
Author:Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:9781260159363
Author:Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:9781260231700
Author:Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht
Publisher:McGraw Hill Education
Discovering the tree of life | California Academy of Sciences; Author: California Academy of Sciences;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjvLQJ6PIiU;License: Standard Youtube License