a
To identify:-The following statements are true or false.
Merger:
Merger is the combination of two entities into one in which shareholders of both the companies merge their resources into new company Merger is basically the result of merging the two or more companies into one.
Purchase Accounting Method for Mergers:
In the purchase accounting method the assets of the targeted company has to be recorded into the current market value in the books of acquiring company and
Synergy:
Synergy is a state in which two or more companies combined then they can perform better than the sum of their individual efforts in terms of productivity, revenue.
Taxable Merger:
Taxable merger is a merger in which one or both the companies have to pay the
Tax-Free Merger:
Tax-free merger is a merger in which none of the companies has to pay the taxes on the capital gains arise due to merger.
b
To identify:-The following statements are true or false.
c
To identify:-The following statements are true or false.
d
To identify:-The following statements are true or false.
e
To identify:-The following statements are true or false.
f
To identify:-The following statements are true or false.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution- It is generally argued that the takeover constraint deters management from engaging in opportunistic behavior.deters management from considering acquiring other companies.deters management from declaring dividends.deters management from increasing a firm’s level of borrowing.arrow_forwardFind a recent merger transaction that failed due to regulatory concerns over market share concentration and reduction of consumer alternatives. Do you support the regulatory concerns? Explain briefly the transaction and your reasoning.arrow_forwardHow does a hostile takeover affect the company’s stakeholder (shareholders, executives, employees, and society in general)? Is it usually beneficial or detrimental to these stakeholders? Why?arrow_forward
- Which of the following is NOT normally regarded as being a barrier to hostile takeovers? a. Abnormally high executive compensation. b. Targeted share repurchases. c. Poison pills. d. Shareholder rights provisions. e. Restricted voting rights.arrow_forwardExamples of systematic risk include a new competitor in the marketplace with the potential to take significant market share from the company invested in, a regulatory change(which could drive down company sales), a shift in management, or a product TRUE OR FALSE?arrow_forwardSuggest some ways in which firms have tried to avoid being part of a target takeover.arrow_forward
- a) What is a conglomerate merger and why are they more likely to be approved? b) Limit pricing is a strategy where a firm sets a low, but profitable, price to discourage entry. How does that differ from predatory pricing? c) What is "Share the gain, share the pain" theory?arrow_forwardWhy might one company have to complete more due diligence than another in a merger? A. None of these answers B. It is important for a company to know what it is buying C. Acquisitions can be risky D. If there is a large size discrepancy the merger seems more like an aquisarrow_forwardDo solve it as soon as possible Identify which statement is not correct. In a takeover bid to acquire a part or all shares in another company: Select one: a. Friendly merger reduces the chance of overpaying for target’s shares. b. Successful acquirer is likely to pay more for target’s shares in scenarios that include multiple rival bidders. c. Target company management would not accept an offer where the consideration for target’s shares exceeds the NPV of the merger. d. Hostile takeover may result in overpaying for target’s shares.arrow_forward
- Which of the following statements is most CORRECT? Oa. Managers who purchase other firms often assert that the new combined firm will enjoy benefits from diversification, including more stable earnings. However, since shareholders are free to diversify their own holdings, and at what's probably a lower cost, diversification benefits is generally not a valid motive for a publicly held firm. Ob. The smaller the synergistic benefits of a particular merger, the greater the scope for striking a bargain in negotiations, and the higher the probability that the merger will be completed. Oc. Since mergers are frequently financed by debt rather than equity, a lower cost of debt or a greater debt capacity are rarely relevant considerations when considering a merger. Od. Operating economies are never a motive for mergers. Oe. Tax considerations often play a part in mergers. If one firm has excess cash, purchasing another firm exposes the purchasing firm to additional taxes. Thus, firms with excess…arrow_forwardwhich of the following does not explain the poor performance of mergers and acquisitions ? i. Managers inaccurately value a target firm beacuse they believe the target firm is undervalued. ii. Mergers benefit may be underestimated iii. Managers mayhave priorities other than the interest of the shareholders a. II only b. III only c. I only d. e. II and III onlyarrow_forwardFrom an investor perspective ESOPs are the most valuable if used to help prevent takeovers but are much less valuable if designed and used to help improve worker productivity. IS THE SATEMENT TRUE OR FALSE?arrow_forward
- Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage LearningEBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT