Connect Access Card for Principles of Auditing & Other Assurance Services
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781260299366
Author: Ray Whittington, Kurt Pany
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 3, Problem 18RQ
To determine
Comment whether accepting the commission would violate the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
For each separate case, state whether the action or situation shows a violation of the AICPACode of Professional Conduct; if so, explain why and cite the relevant rule or interpretation.a. Your client, Contrary Corporation, is very upset over the fact that your audit last yearfailed to detect an $800,000 inventory overstatement caused by employee theft and falsification of the records. The board discussed the matter and authorized its attorneys toexplore the possibility of a lawsuit for damages.b. Contrary Corporation filed a lawsuit alleging negligent audit work, seeking $1 million indamages.c. In response to the lawsuit by Contrary, you decided to bring litigation against certain officers of the company alleging management fraud and deceit. You are asking for a damagejudgment of $500,000.d. The Allright Insurance Company paid Contrary Corporation $700,000 under a fidelitybond covering an inventory theft by employees. Allright is suing your public accountingfirm for damages on the…
Tracy Smith, CPA, is in charge of the audit of Olympic Fashions, Inc. Seven young members of the public accounting firm's professional staff are working with Smith on this engagement, and several of the young auditors are avid skiers. Olympic Fashions owns two condominiums in Aspen, Colorado, that it uses primarily to entertain clients. The controller of Olympic Fashions has told Smith that she and any of her audit staff are welcome to use the condominiums at no charge any time that they are not already in use. How should Smith respond to this offer? Explain.
According to the AICPA Code of Conduct, which of the following acts is generally forbidden to CPAs in public practice?a. Purchasing bookkeeping software from a high-tech development company and resellingit to tax clients.b. Being the author of a “TaxAid” newsletter promoted and sold by a publishing company.c. Having a commission arrangement with an accounting software developer to receive4 percent of the price of programs recommended and sold to audit clients.d. Engaging a marketing firm to obtain new financial planning clients for a fixed fee of$1,000 for each successful contact.
Chapter 3 Solutions
Connect Access Card for Principles of Auditing & Other Assurance Services
Ch. 3 - What is meant by the term ethical dilemma?...Ch. 3 - What are the two major types of constraints on...Ch. 3 - Prob. 3RQCh. 3 - Prob. 4RQCh. 3 - Prob. 5RQCh. 3 - Prob. 6RQCh. 3 - Prob. 7RQCh. 3 - Bill Scott works as a manager in the Phoenix...Ch. 3 - Prob. 9RQCh. 3 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 3 - Prob. 11RQCh. 3 - Prob. 12RQCh. 3 - Prob. 13RQCh. 3 - Prob. 14RQCh. 3 - Prob. 15RQCh. 3 - Prob. 16RQCh. 3 - Prob. 17RQCh. 3 - Prob. 18RQCh. 3 - Prob. 19RQCh. 3 - Prob. 20RQCh. 3 - Prob. 21RQCh. 3 - Prob. 22RQCh. 3 - Prob. 23RQCh. 3 - Prob. 24RQCh. 3 - Prob. 25RQCh. 3 - Prob. 26RQCh. 3 - Prob. 27QRACh. 3 - Prob. 28QRACh. 3 - Prob. 29QRACh. 3 - Prob. 30QRACh. 3 - Prob. 31QRACh. 3 - Prob. 32QRACh. 3 - Ron Barber, CPA, is auditing the financial...Ch. 3 - Prob. 34AOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34BOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34COQCh. 3 - Prob. 34DOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34EOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34FOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34GOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34HOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34IOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34JOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34KOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34LOQCh. 3 - Prob. 35OQCh. 3 - Prob. 36OQCh. 3 - Prob. 37OQCh. 3 - Prob. 38OQCh. 3 - Prob. 39OQCh. 3 - Prob. 40OQCh. 3 - Prob. 41OQCh. 3 - Prob. 42OQCh. 3 - Gary Watson, a graduating business student at a...Ch. 3 - Prob. 44PCh. 3 - Prob. 45PCh. 3 - Prob. 46PCh. 3 - Prob. 47PCh. 3 - Prob. 48PCh. 3 - Prob. 49ITCCh. 3 - Prob. 50ITCCh. 3 - Prob. 51RDC
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Ginnian and Fitch, a regional accounting firm, performs yearly audits on a number of different for-profit and not-for-profit entities. Two years ago, Luisa Mellina, Ginnians partner in charge of operations, became concerned about the amount of audit time required by not-for-profit entities. As a result, she instituted a series of training programs focusing on the auditing of not-forprofit entities. Now, she would like to see if the training seemed to work. So, she ran a multiple regression on 22 months of data for Ginnian for three variables: the total monthly cost of audit professional time, the number of not-for-profit audits, and the hours of training in the audit of not-for-profit entities. The following printout was obtained: Required: 1. Write out the cost equation for Ginnians audit professional time. 2. If Ginnian expects to have 9 audits of not-for-profits next month and expects that audit professionals will have a total of 130 hours of not-for-profit training, what is the anticipated cost of professional time? 3. Are the hours spent auditing not-for-profit entities positively or negatively correlated with audit professional costs? Is percentage of experienced team members positively or negatively correlated with audit professional cost? 4. What does R2 mean in this equation? Overall, what is your evaluation of the cost equation that was developed for the cost of audit professionals?arrow_forwardThe audit partner has just advised you that he has been approached to accept the appointment of auditor to Games Limited. Games Limited is a manufacturer of gaming machines and has been named in a recent anti-corruption inquiry as having offered incentives to state government members to support a proposed bill which would allow an increased number of gaming machines in licensed premises. No charges have yet been laid against Games Limited or any of its employees. The audit partner explains to you that Games Limited’s auditors were re-appointed for the current financial year at the Annual General Meeting held two months ago. However, Games Limited’s managing director is unhappy with the existing auditing firm as the audit partner assigned to Games Limited has been changed. Required: The audit partner is unsure whether he should accept the appointment and has asked you to outline any ethical, legal and other factors to be considered in his decision about whether to accept the…arrow_forwardAn audit client is being sued for $500,000 for discriminatory hiring practices. Indicate the appropriate action the auditor should take for each of the following independent responses to the letter of audit inquiry: c. The lawyer stated that there is a reasonable possibility that the client will lose. The client disclosed this situation, but did not accrue a loss.arrow_forward
- An audit client is being sued for $500,000 for discriminatory hiring practices. Indicate the appropriate action the auditor should take for each of the following independent responses to the letter of audit inquiry: The lawyer stated that there is only a remote chance that the client will lose. The client did not accrue any contingent loss or disclose this situation.arrow_forward[The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Per SEC release, from 2012 through 2014 then EY partner Pamela Hartford violated Independence Rules by having an affair with a client. Reports state she engaged in a personal relationship with Robert Brehl, the chief accounting officer of a public company that she serviced as a member of the audit engagement team. Another EY partner Michael Kamienski (the supervising partner on this engagement) became aware of facts suggesting an improper relationship between Hartford and Brehl. However, he failed to follow up on his suspicions. While Hartford and Brehl tried to keep their relationship a secret, they did attend client and EY social events. This suggests that others at both EY and the client could have been aware of the affair. As part of the first SEC enforcement action of its kind, the SEC made charges of a breach of Independence against EY, Hartford, and Kaminski as well as Brehl. All parties agreed to settle the…arrow_forward[The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Per SEC release, from 2012 through 2014 then EY partner Pamela Hartford violated Independence Rules by having an affair with a client. Reports state she engaged in a personal relationship with Robert Brehl, the chief accounting officer of a public company that she serviced as a member of the audit engagement team. Another EY partner Michael Kamienski (the supervising partner on this engagement) became aware of facts suggesting an improper relationship between Hartford and Brehl. However, he failed to follow up on his suspicions. While Hartford and Brehl tried to keep their relationship a secret, they did attend client and EY social events. This suggests that others at both EY and the client could have been aware of the affair. As part of the first SEC enforcement action of its kind, the SEC made charges of a breach of Independence against EY, Hartford, and Kaminski as well as Brehl. All parties agreed to settle the…arrow_forward
- Susan Small, CPA has Medium Corporation as an audit client. Medium has asked Small to create and install a new computerized payroll system. Because Small does not have the appropriate level of expertise, she referred Medium to Compusystems, Inc., a local software consulting company. Small has an arrangement where she is paid ten percent of any fee received by Compusystems from her referrals. Small has disclosed this to her client. Required: The situation above involves a possible violation of the AICPA's Code of Professional Conduct. State the rule in question and explain why or why not there is a violation of the code. You need not refer to the rule number, but should clearly describe the rule in question.arrow_forwardDuring an internal investigation, Black, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed Green, a fraud suspect. Although Green wanted to leave in the middle of the interview, Black blocked the exit and prevented him from leaving. Green subsequently confessed to committing fraud. If, under these facts, Green files a lawsuit for false imprisonment against Black, Black will likely: A. Win the case because the qualified business privilege protects investigators conducting internal investigations. B. Win the case because Green confessed to the fraud. C. Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Green without consent or legal justification. D. Lose the cans because Green did not leave the interview.arrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. If Apex Construction also sues Williams for negligence, what are the probable legal defenses Williams’s attorney would raise?…arrow_forward
- Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. What liability does Williams have to Jackson Financial? Explainarrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. Will the negligence of Mark Williams, CPA, prevent him from recovering on a liability insurance policy covering the practice of…arrow_forwardFor each of the following situations involving relations between auditors and the companies they audit, indicate whether it violates IFAC’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants and the rationale for the applicable guideline. Paul Asante, CPA, discloses confidential information in a peer review of the firm’s quality control procedures. Frank Smith, CPA, is auditing a company in Ghana, which has offered to send him and his wife on a holiday in Hawaii for two weeks. Tabula Gonzales, CPA, says in an interview in the local paper that Emilio Rios, CPA, misleads his clients about the quality of his audit work.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College PubBusiness Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:Cengage
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Cengage Learning