Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781337517942
Author: NICHOLSON
Publisher: Cengage
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 3, Problem 3.10P
(a)
To determine
To discuss:If
(b)
To determine
To explain:Along with diagram, why MRS > 1 when
(c)
To determine
To discuss: If the function is homothetic.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Adam Smith from the Classical School had introduced the “water-diamond paradox” in his Theory of Value. But he did not solve the paradox because he failed to understand the concept of utility. Explain by demonstrating relevant graph how this paradox was solved by William Stanley Jevons from the Marginalist School by using law of diminishing marginal utility.
a. What is an Inferior good? Sketch an Engel curve for inferior goods and clearly label the two axes.
b. Briefly explain why demand may increase as price increases? (Hint: think about substitution and income
effects.)
c. What is the relationship between Inferior and Giffen goods? Use a Slutsky equation to justify your statement.
d. Some people may work less when their wage rates go up. Why is it the case? (Hint: think about
substitution effect and endowment income effect).
(a) If a consumer has to choose between McDonald burger and King Burger, both are perfect substitute to each other. Explain the conditions of consumer's equilibrium with the help of graph.
(b) Suppose that the price of commodity Y is $ 20 per unit while the price of commodity X is $ 15
per unit and suppose that an individual’s money income is $ 100 per period and is all spent on X & Y.
Draw the budget constraint line for this consumer at the initial point.
If the price of X decreases to $10, incorporate BL2 showing change in the Budget line.
Calculate slope of Budget Line for both cases.
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Recent research confirms that the demand for cigarettes is not only inelastic, but it also indicates that smokers with incomes in the lower half of all incomes respond to a given price increase by reducing their purchases by amounts that are more than four times as large as the purchase reductions made by smokers in the upper half of all incomes. How can the income and substitution effects of a price change help explain this finding?arrow_forwardPraxilla, who lived in ancient Greece, derives utility from reading poems and from eating cucumbers. Praxilla gets 30 units of marginal utility from her first poem 27 units of marginal utility from her second poem 24 units of marginal utility from her third poem, and so on, with marginal utility declining by three units for each additional poem. Praxilla gets six units of marginal utility for each of her next three cucumbers consumed, five units of marginal utility for each of her next three cucumbers consumed, four units of marginal utility for each of the following three cucumbers consumed, and so on, with marginal utility declining by one for every three cucumber consumed. A poem costs three bronze coins hut a cucumber costs only one bronze coin. Praxilla has 18 bronze coins. Sketch Praxillas budget set between poems and cucumbers, placing poems on the vertical axis and cucumbers on the horizontal axis. Start off with the choice of zero poems and 18 cucumbers, and calculate the changes in marginal utility of moving along the budget line to the next choice of one poem and 15 cucumbers. Using this step-by-step process based on marginal utility, create a table and identify Praxillas utility—maximizing choice. Compare the marginal utility of the two goods and the relative prices at the optimal choice to see if the expected relationship holds. Hint: Label the table columns: 1) Choice, 2} Marginal Gain from More Poems, 3) Marginal Loss from Fewer Cucumbers, 4) Overall Gain or Loss, 5) Is the previous choice Optimal? Label the table rows: 1) 0 Poems and 18 Cucumbers, 2) 1 Poem and 15 cucumbers, 3) 2 Poems and 12 cucumbers, 4) 3 Poems and 9 Cucumbers, 5) 4 Poems and 6 cucumbers 6) 5 Poems and 3 Cucumbers, 7) 6 Poems and 0 Cucumbers.arrow_forwardSuppose pizza(P) and hamburger(H) are perfect substitutes for Andy. He is always willing to substitute two pizzas for one hamburge(b) The price of pizza is pP = $2 per pizza and the price of hamburger is pH = $2 per hamburger.What is Andy’s optimal consumption bundle if his income level is $30?(c) To promote the sale of pizza, now the owner of the pizza restaurant decides to give out the first two pizzas to every consumer for free, and af- terwards, if the consumer wants more, the consumer will still pay at the price of pP = $2 per pizza. If the price of hamburger and Andy’s income are same as before,draw Andy’s budget line. What is Andy’s optimal con- sumption bundle in this case?(d) Now,to promote the sale of pizza, instead of giving out the first two pizzas for free, the owner of the pizza restaurant decides to lower the price of pizza to $0.8 per pizza. Given price of hamburger and Andy’s income remain the same as before, what is Andy’s optimal consumption budle now? Compare with…arrow_forward
- Anya is awake for 100 hours per week. Using onediagram, show Anya’s budget constraints if sheearns $12 per hour, $16 per hour, and $20 per hour.Now draw indifference curves such that Anya’slabor-supply curve is upward-sloping whenthe wage is between $12 and $16 per hour andbackward-sloping when the wage is between $16and $20 per hourarrow_forward4. Two individuals, Amir and Budi, consume two goods, clothes (X) and shoes (Y). The utility functions for the two individuals are given as: Utility function of Amir, UA = 15X0.25Y0.75Utility function of Budi, UB = 25X0.5Y0.5 The current price for clothes (Px) is Rp 100,000 and the current price for shoes (PY) is Rp 150,000 a. Determine marginal rate of substitution (MRSXY)between clothes (X) and shoes (Y) for Amir and Budi! Please explain. b. Amir is currently consuming 5 units of clothes (X) and 10 units of shoes (Y), whereas Budi is consuming 12 units of clothes (X) and 8 units of shoes (Y). At this current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached the efficient allocation of clothes and shoes? If they have, explain why. If they have not, calculate the optimal allocation and explain. c. Considering the relative price between of clothes and shoes, at the current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached exchange equilibrium? Please explain d. Use the Edgeworth Box to illustrate the…arrow_forward4. Two individuals, Amir and Budi, consume two goods, clothes (X) and shoes (Y). The utility functions for the two individuals are given as: Utility function of Amir, UA = 15X0.25Y0.75Utility function of Budi, UB = 25X0.5Y0.5 The current price for clothes (Px) is Rp 100,000 and the current price for shoes (PY) is Rp 150,000 a. Determine marginal rate of substitution (MRSXY)between clothes (X) and shoes (Y) for Amir and Budi! Please explain. b. Amir is currently consuming 5 units of clothes (X) and 10 units of shoes (Y), whereas Budi is consuming 12 units of clothes (X) and 8 units of shoes (Y). At this current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached the efficient allocation of clothes and shoes? If they have, explain why. If they have not, calculate the optimal allocation and explain. c. Considering the relative price between of clothes and shoes, at the current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached exchange equilibrium? Please explain d. Use the Edgeworth Box to illustrate the…arrow_forward
- a & c have already been answered, mainly looking for help on b, d, e and f. Thank you so much! Mary spends all her budget on statistical software (S) and office supplies (O). Her preferences can be represented by the utility function: U (S, O) = 2 ln(S) + 3 ln(O). (a) Compute the marginal rate of substitution of software for office sup- plies. Is the MRS increasing or decreasing in S? How do we interpret this? (b) Find Mary’s demand functions for software and office supplies, QS (pS,pO,I) and QO (pS,pO,I), in terms of the price of software (pS), the price of office supplies (pO), and Mary’s budget (I). (c) Suppose that the price of software is pS = 2, the price of office supplies is pO = 3, and Mary’s income is I = 10. What bundle of software and office supplies (S, C) maximizes Mary’s utility? (d) Suppose the price of software increases to pS = 4. What bundle of software and office supplies does Mary demand now? (e) Given the price increase, how much income does Mary need to…arrow_forwardSuppose that U(f,c) = f + 8c^(1/2)is a utility function that describes Amelia’s preferences over two goods: fish(f)and custard (c). For the following, think of fish as the good graphed on the horizontal axis.a. Derive an expression for her marginal utility (Uf)from a small increase in f holding c fixed. Also find themarginal utility for custard (Uc).b. What is Amelia’s marginal rate of substitution (MRS)? Give a brief (2 sentences maximum) intuitivedescription of what MRS represents. If Amelia has 4 units of custard, holding her utility constant, howmany units of custard would she be willing to give up in order to get one more unit of fish?c. Graph Amelia’s indifference curve for a utility level of 40. Be sure to specify at least 3 bundles of goodson the indifference curve.d. Does the fact that Amelia’s indifference curve intersects with the custard axis violate any of the 5properties of indifference curves? Briefly support your answer.e. Give another utility function that represents…arrow_forwardPlease answer all (a) to (e), whether they are True or False:(a) If a consumer spends her entire income, then she has a strictly monotone utility function.(b) The condition that ‘the marginal rates of substitution equal the ratio of prices’ is necessary but not sufficient for a given bundle to be a Walrasian demand.(c) If U, V: R2 → R are such that U is a strictly increasing transformation of V then U and V must represent the same preferences.(d) If the substitution effect is negative (in response to a price increase) then we know the Walrasian demand for the good in question (in response to the same price increase) will also be negative.(e) A consumer’s utility is continuous and strictly monotone and when prices are given by p and income is I her Walrasian demand yields a utility of 7. Then, any bundle that yields a utility of at least 8 must cost more than Iarrow_forward
- 1. Every week I spend a total of £400 buying two goods, luxuries (L) and necessities(N). I obtain utility (U) from these goods according to the rule U(L, N) = 10 + L +20N-2N^2. Suppose that I pay £10 for each unit of L and £20 for each unit of N andthat I am a utility-maximiser. MUL=1 and MUN=20-4N.Define the Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS) as MRS = MUL/MUN).Calculate its value at the bundle (L = 0 and N = 4) and at (L = 1 and N4). (ii)By referring to a graphic illustration of the above calculations or otherwise,argue that an increase in my budget will have no effect on myconsumption of N if I am already consuming 2.5 units of N. (iii) Calculate my optimum choice of L and N if instead I have £40 to spend. Explain your answer.arrow_forwardConsider a person with the utility function U (C, L) = (1 − α) log C + α log L, where L is leisure time and C is consumption of other goods measured in dollars. The person has V dollars of non-labor income and a wage of w. There are T hours available for either working or leisure. 1. Write down the person’s budget constraint. Draw a graph representing this constraint, taking care to label the axes and key points. 2. What are the person’s marginal utilities for consumption and leisure? What is her marginal rate of substitution between leisure and consumption in terms of C, L, and α? 3. Write down a condition involving the person’s marginal rate of substitution that characterizes her optimal choice. Represent this condition graphically and interpret in words. 4. Solve for the person’s optimal choices of leisure and consumption, L ∗ and C ∗ , in terms of T, V , w, and α. 5. How does L ∗ change as you increase wage w and non-labor income V ? 6. How does C ∗ change as you increase wage…arrow_forwardSuppose Coke and Pepsi are perfect substitutes for me, and right and left shoes are perfect complements. A. Suppose my income allocated to Coke/Pepsi consumption is $100 per month, and my income allocated to right/left shoe consumption is similarly $100 per month. a. Suppose Coke currently costs $0.50 per can and Pepsi costs $0.75 per can. Then the price of Coke goes up to $1 per can. Illustrate my original and my new optimal bundle with "Coke" on the horizontal and "Pepsi" on the vertical axis. b. Suppose right and left shoes are sold separately. If right and left shoes are originally both priced at $1, illustrate (on a graph with "right shoes" on the horizontal and "left shoes" on the vertical) my original and my new optimal bundle when the price of left shoes increases to $2. c. True or False: Perfect complements represent a unique special case of homothetic tastes in the following sense: Whether income goes up or whether the price of one of the goods falls, the optimal bundle…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax