EBK AUDITING & ASSURANCE SERVICES: A SY
EBK AUDITING & ASSURANCE SERVICES: A SY
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260687668
Author: Jr
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL LEARNING SOLN.(CC)
bartleby

Videos

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 3, Problem 3.31P

a

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 1

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.

a

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 3.31P

  • Determination of Materiality.

Income before taxes, $1,050,000

Total Assets, $27,500,000

Total revenue, $38,750,000

  • Determination of tolerable misstatement.

Income before taxes, $525,000

Total Assets, $1,375,000

Total revenue, $19,375,000

  1. The overstatement should be adjusted, or auditor would give a qualified opinion

Explanation of Solution

  1. Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.
    • Determination of Materiality.

    when 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

    Total revenue, $38,750,000 = $775,000,000×0.05

    Total Assets, $27,500,000 = $550,000,000×0.05

    Income before taxes, $1,050,000 = $21,000,000×0.05

    • Determination of tolerable misstatement.

    The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

    Income before taxes = $525,000 = $1,050,000×0.5

    Total Assets, $1,375,000 = $27,500,000×0.5

    Total revenue, $19,375,000 = $38,750,000×0.5

  2. Evaluation of two misstatements aggregated to an overstatement of income of $1.25 million.
  3. The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

    In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

    Income before taxes:

    M&J overall materiality $1.05 million and tolerable misstatement $525,000.

    Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust to $1.25 million in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

    Total Assets

    M&J overall materiality $27.5 million and tolerable misstatement $1.375 million.

    As aggregated misstatement is an overstatement of income and no information is available about its effect on assets it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

    Total revenue

    M&J overall materiality $38.75 million and tolerable misstatement $19.375 million.

    Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $1.25 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

b

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 2

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

b

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 3.31P

  • Determination of Materiality.
  • Income before taxes, $2,000,000

    Total Assets, $215,000,000

    Total revenue, $45,000,000

  • Determination of tolerable misstatement.
  • Income before taxes = $1,000,000

    Total Assets, $107,500,000

    Total revenue, $22,500,000

Explanation of Solution

  1. Determination of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.
    • Determination of Materiality.
    • When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

    Total revenue, $45,000,000 = $900,000,000×0.05

    Total Assets, $215,000,000 = $4,300,000,000×0.05

    Income before taxes, $2,000,000 = $40,000,000×0.05

    • Determination of tolerable misstatement.

    The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement.

    Total revenue, $22,500,000 = $45,000,000×0.5

    Total Assets, $107,500,000 = $215,000,000×0.5

    Income before taxes = $1,000,000 = $2,000,000×0.5

  2. Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.
  3. The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality, the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

    In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

    Income before taxes:

    M&J overall materiality $2 million and tolerable misstatement $1 million.

    Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

    Total Assets

    M&J overall materiality $215 million and tolerable misstatement $107.5 million.

    As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

    Total revenue

    M&J overall materiality $45 million and tolerable misstatement $22.5 million.

    Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust $5.75 million overstatements if it is related to revenue in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

c

To determine

Introduction:

Materiality: The theory of materiality is very important to audit practice, it is planning and executing the audit process using the concept of materiality and its application to audit risk, materiality is used to check if misstatements in the financial statements and disclosures are significant, once misstatements are identified auditor requires reliable evidence in support of findings.

Scenario 3

The overall materiality, tolerable misstatement, and effect of two deleted misstatements that aggregated to an overstatement of income of $5.75 million.

c

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 3.31P

  • Determination of Materiality.
  • Income before taxes, $25,000

    Total Assets, $110,000,000

    Total revenue, $350,000,000

  • Determination of tolerable misstatement.
  • Income before taxes, $12,500

    Total Assets, $55,000,000

    Total revenue, $175,000,000

Explanation of Solution

  1. Calculation of Materiality and tolerable misstatement.
    • Determination of Materiality.

    When 5 per cent of the benchmark is applied for overall materiality. The materiality of M&J will be:

    Total revenue, $350,000,000 = $7,000,000,000×0.05

    Total Assets, $110,000,000 = $2,200,000,000×0.05

    Income before taxes, $25,000 = $500,000×0.05

    • Determination of tolerable misstatement.

    The tolerable misstatement is usually kept in between 50 to 75 per cent for each of the accounts of overall materiality. Thus, we assume 50 per cent of tolerable misstatement

    Total revenue, $175,000,000 = $350,000,000×0.5

    Total Assets, $55,000,000 = $110,000,000×0.5

    Income before taxes = $12,500 = $25,000×0.5

  2. Evaluation of misstatements of an overstatement of income of $1.5 million.
  3. The misstatements and tolerable misstatement are compared with each other. If misstatement is greater than tolerable misstatement or if aggregate misstatements were greater than overall materiality the business has to correct the financial statements or else auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

    In the case of M&J misstatement is both greater than tolerable misstatement and overall materiality.

    Income before taxes:

    M&J overall materiality $25,000 and tolerable misstatement $12,500.

    Thus, it can be concluded that they have to adjust misstatement in the financial statements or auditor will issue qualified or adverse opinion.

    Total Assets

    M&J overall materiality $110 million and tolerable misstatement $55 million.

    As aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

    Total revenue

    M&J overall materiality $350 million and tolerable misstatement $175 million.

    Thus, it can be concluded that aggregated misstatement is below the overall materiality and tolerable misstatement it can be assumed that asset balances are fairly stated in accordance with GAAP.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
You are evaluating audit results for assets in the audit ofRoberts Manufacturing. You set the preliminary judgment about materiality at $50,000.The account balances, performance materiality, and estimated overstatements in theaccounts are shown next.Account Performance Estimate of TotalAccount Balance Materiality OverstatementsCash $ 50,000 $ 5,000 $ 1,000Accounts receivable 1,200,000 30,000 20,000Inventory 2,500,000 50,000 ?Other assets 250,000 15,000 12,000Total $4,000,000 $100,000 ? a. Assume you tested inventory amounts totaling $1,000,000 and found $10,000 inoverstatements. Ignoring sampling risk, what is your estimate of the total misstatement in inventory?b. Based on the audit of the assets accounts and ignoring other accounts, are the overallfinancial statements acceptable? Explain.c. What do you believe the auditor should do in the circumstances?
In order to form an audit opinion, auditors must obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence. ISA 500 identifies the types of auditing procedures that an auditor might carry out in order to obtain audit evidence. The auditor is planning for the audit of a We can LLC, assembles specialist motor vehicles for industrial purposes such as earth movers and trucks. The total assets of the business are OMR 150 Million. The company owns four assembly plants to which parts are delivered and assembled into the motor vehicles. The auditor believes that the financial statements are at risk of material misstatement but as the part of his audit engagement an auditor wishes to: 1. Test the plant and equipment recorded in the financial statements of the We can LLC does exist in all four assemble plants. 2. Test the Sales transaction have been recorded in the financial statements at appropriate amount. 3. Test the cash balance has been included in the financial statements at appropriate amount. 4. Test…
You were requested to personally deliver your auditor’s report to the board of directors of Sebal Manufacturing Corporation and answer questions posed about the financial statements. While reading the statements, one director asked what are the precise meanings of the terms cost, expense, and loss? These terms seem sometimes to identify similar items and other times dissimilar items.”book value of the component’s net assets. The component was operating at a loss from the beginning of the year. in addition, Lynn had one of its manufacturing plants destroyed by an earthquake during the year. Earthquakes are not uncommon in Lynn’s operating environment.                                                                                  1. Explain how Lynn should report discoutinued operations of a component of its business on its income statement for this year. Do not discuss earnings per share requirements.                                                                  2. Explain how Lynn…
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Finance
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Text book image
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Asset impairment explained; Author: The Finance Storyteller;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWMDdtHF4ZU;License: Standard Youtube License