The company RTI has its corporate headquarters, four warehouses, maintenance and storing facility in Massachusetts, and deals in freight business on the U.S. Eastern Coast mostly. All the freight carriers of RTI were purchased from other states. The State of Massachusetts levies a use tax on all persons within its jurisdiction, including persons doing interstate business. The Massachusetts state further levies a tax on the purchase price of individual carriers, including trucks and trailers of RTI. To explain: The fundamental aspects of commerce clause when a state law has implications on interstate trade.

Question

The Commerce Clause. Regency Transportation, Inc., operates a freight business throughout the eastern United States. Regency maintains its corporate headquarters, four warehouses, and a maintenance facility and terminal location for repairing and storing vehicles in Massachusetts. All of the vehicles in Regency’s fleet were bought in other states. Massachusetts imposes a use tax on all taxpayers subject to its jurisdiction, including those that do business in interstate commerce, as Regency does. When Massachusetts imposed the tax on the purchase price of each tractor and trailer in Regency’s fleet, the trucking firm challenged the assessment as discriminatory under the commerce clause. What is the chief consideration under the commerce clause when a state law affects interstate commerce? Is Massachusetts’s use tax valid? Explain

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 4, Problem 8BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The company RTI has its corporate headquarters, four warehouses, maintenance and storing facility in Massachusetts, and deals in freight business on the U.S. Eastern Coast mostly. All the freight carriers of RTI were purchased from other states. The State of Massachusetts levies a use tax on all persons within its jurisdiction, including persons doing interstate business. The Massachusetts state further levies a tax on the purchase price of individual carriers, including trucks and trailers of RTI.

To explain:The fundamental aspects of commerce clause when a state law has implications on interstate trade.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The company RTI has its corporate headquarters, four warehouses, maintenance and storing facility in Massachusetts, and deals in freight business on the U.S. Eastern Coast mostly. All the freight carriers of RTI were purchased from other states. The State of Massachusetts levies a use tax on all persons within its jurisdiction, including persons doing interstate business. The Massachusetts state further levies a tax on the purchase price of individual carriers, including trucks and trailers of the company RTI.

To explain:The use tax levied by Massachusetts on the company RTI is justified under the commerce clause.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

The Commerce Clause. Regency Transportation, Inc., operates a freight business throughout the eastern United States. Regency maintains its corporate headquarters, four warehouses, and a maintenance facility and terminal location for repairing and storing vehicles in Massachusetts. All of the vehicles in Regency’s fleet were bought in other states. Massachusetts imposes a use tax on all taxpayers subject to its jurisdiction, including those that do business in interstate commerce, as Regency does. When Massachusetts imposed the tax on the purchase price of each tractor and trailer in Regency’s fleet, the trucking firm challenged the assessment as discriminatory under the commerce clause. What is the chief consideration under the commerce clause when a state law affects interstate commerce? Is Massachusetts’s use tax valid? Explain

Regency transportation, Inc., operates a freight business throughout the eastern United States. Regency maintains its corporate headquarters and other facilities in Massachusetts. The vehicles in Regency's fleet were bought in other states. Massachusetts imposes various taxes on all taxpayers subject to its jurisdiction, including those that, like Regency, do business in interstate commerce. When Massachusetts imposed a tax on purchase price of each vehicle in Regency's fleet, the trucking firm challenged the assessment as discriminatory under the commerce clause. What is the chief consideration under the commerce clause when a state law affects interstate commerce? Is Massachusetts's tax valid? Explain.

Global Crossing The company was founded in 1997 to provide a trans-Atlantic cable to carry telephone and data traffic. Using high-bandwidth optical fiber, the company was able to sell capacity at less than half the price of existing competitors. After six months of operations, Global Crossing offered stock to the public, and the resulting price valued the firm at an astounding $19 billion. Six months later it was valued at $38 billion, more than the Ford Motor Company. The cable technology was not proprietary and data-carrying capacity was a commodity. That meant that customers could easily switch from one supplier to another, putting them in a powerful bargaining position. Furthermore, customers were price-sensitive. Even worse, the threat of entry was high, and other companies were entering the business, fueled by easy financing. High fixed costs but near-zero marginal costs (the cost to carry one more piece of data) led to fierce price competition within the industry. As new…