Concept explainers
PROBLEM 4B-6 Step-Down Method versus Direct Method; Predetermined
Factory Administration | $270,000 |
Custodial Services | 68,760 |
Personnel | 28,840 |
Maintenance | 45,200 |
Machining-overhead | 376,300 |
Assembly-overhead | 175.900 |
Total cost | $955,000 |
The company allocates service department costs to other departments in the order listed below.
Square
Department | Number of Employees | Total Labor- Hours |
Feet of Space Occupied | Direct Labor- Hours |
Machine- Hours |
Factory Administration ... | ... 12 | - | 5,000 | - | - |
Custodial Services | ... 4 |
3,000 | 2,000 | - | - |
Personnel | ... 5 |
5,000 | 3,000 | - | - |
Maintenance | ... 25 |
22,000 | 10,000 | - | - |
Machining | ... 40 |
30,000 | 70,000 | 20,000 | 70,000 |
Assembly | ... 60 | 90,000 | 20,000 | 80,000 | 10,000 |
146 | 150.000 | 110,000 | 100,000 | 80,000 |
Machining and Assembly are operating departments: the other departments are service departments. Factory Administration is allocated based on labor-hours: Custodial Services based on square feet occupied: Personnel based on number of employees: and Maintenance based on machine-hours.
Required:
- Allocated services department costs to consuming departments by the step-down method. Then compute predetermined overhead rates in the operating departments using machine-hours as the allocated base in Machining and direct labor-hours as the allocation base in Assembly.
- Repeat (1) above, this time using the direct method. Again compute predetermined overhead rates in Machining and Assembly.
- Assume that the company doesn’t bother with allocating service department costs but simply computers a single plantwide overhead rate that divides the total overhead costs (both service department and operating costs) by the total direct labor-hours. Compute the plantwide overhead rate.
- Suppose a job requires machine and labor time as follows:
Machine-Hours | Direct Labour-Hours | |
Machine Department | 190 | 25 |
Assembly Department | 10 | 75 |
Total hours | 200 | 100 |
Using the overhead rates computed in (l). (I), and (3) above, compute the amount of overhead cost that would be assigned to the job if the overhead rates were developed using the step-down method, the direct method, and the plantwide method.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 4 Solutions
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
- Budget performance report for a cost center Sneed Industries Company sells vehicle parts to manufacturers of heavy construction equipment. The Crane Division is organized as a cost center. The budget for the Crane Division for the month ended August 31, 20Y6, is as follows (in thousands): During August, the costs incurred in the Crane Division were as follows: Instructions For which costs might the director be expected to request supplemental reports?arrow_forwardBudget performance report for a cost center Sneed Industries Company sells vehicle parts to manufacturers of heavy construction equipment. The Crane Division is organized as a cost center. The budget for the Crane Division for the month ended August 31, 20Y6, is as follows (in thousands): During August, the costs incurred in the Crane Division were as follows: Instructions Prepare a budget performance report for the director of the Crane Division for the month of August.arrow_forwardActivity-based and department rate product costing and product cost distortions Black and Blue Sports Inc. manufactures two products: snowboards and skis. The factory overhead incurred is as follows: Indirect labor 507,000 Cutting Department 156,000 Finishing Department 192,000 Total 855,000 The activity hase associated with the two production departments is direct labor hours. The indirect labor can be assigned to two different activities as follows: Activity Budgeted Activity Cost Activity Base Production control 237,000 Number of production runs Materials handling 270,000 Number of moves Total 507,000 The activity-base usage quantities and units produced for the two products follow: Number o Production Runs Number of Moves Direct Labor HoursCutting Direct Labor HoursFinishing Units Produced Snowboards 430 5,000 4,000 2,000 6,000 Skis _70 2,500 2,000 4,000 6,000 Total 500 7,500 6,000 6,000 12,000 Instructions 1. Determine the factory overhead rates under the multiple production department rate method. Assume that indirect labor is associated with the production departments, so that the total factory overhead is 315,000 and 540,000 for the Cutting and finishing departments, respectively. 2. Determine the total and per-unit factory overhead costs allocated to each product, using the multiple production department overhead rates in (1). 3. Determine the activity rates, assuming that the indirect labor is associated with activities rather than with the production departments. 4. Determine the total and per-unit cost assigned to each product under activity-based costing. 5. Explain the difference in the per-unit overhead allocated to each product under the multiple production department factory overhead rate and activity-based costing methods.arrow_forward
- Factory overhead cost variance report Tiger Equipment Inc., a manufacturer of construction equipment, prepared the following factory overhead cost budget for the Welding Department for May of the current year. The company expected to operate the department at 100% of normal capacity of 8,400 hours. During May, the department operated at 8,860 hours, and the factory overhead costs incurred were indirect factory wages, 32,400; power and light, 21,000; indirect materials, 18,250; supervisory salaries, 20,000; depreciation of plant and equipment, 36,200; and insurance and property taxes, 15,200. Variable costs: Indirect factory wages 30,240 Power and light 20,160 Indirect materials 16,800 Total variable cost 67,200 Fixed costs: Supervisory salaries 20,000 Depreciation of plant and equipment 36,200 Insurance and property taxes 15,200 Total fixed cost 71,400 Total factory overhead cost 138,600 Instructions Prepare a factory overhead cost variance report for May. To be useful for cost control, the budgeted amounts should be based on 8,860 hours.arrow_forwardFactory overhead rate Fabricator Inc., a specialized equipment manufacturer, uses a job order cost system. The overhead is allocated to jobs on the basis of direct labor hours. The overhead rate is now $3,000 per direct labor hour. The design engineer thinks that this is illogical. The design engineer has stated the following: Our accounting system doesn't make any sense to me. It tells me that every labor hour carries an additional burden of $3,000. This means that while direct labor makes up only 5% of our total product cost, it drives all our costs. In addition, these rates give my design engineers incentives to "design out" direct labor by using machine technology. Yet, over the past years as we have had less and less direct labor, the overhead rate keeps going up and up. I won't be surprised if next year the rate is $4,000 per direct labor hour. I'm also concerned because small errors in our estimates of the direct labor content can have a large impact on our estimated costs. Just a 30~minute error in our estimate of assembly time is worth $ 1,500. Small mistakes in our direct labor time estimates really swing our bids around. I think this puts us at a disadvantage when we are going after business. What do you think is a possible solution?arrow_forwardFactory overhead rate Fabricator Inc., a specialized equipment manufacturer, uses a job order cost system. The overhead is allocated to jobs on the basis of direct labor hours. The overhead rate is now $3,000 per direct labor hour. The design engineer thinks that this is illogical. The design engineer has stated the following: Our accounting system doesn't make any sense to me. It tells me that every labor hour carries an additional burden of $3,000. This means that while direct labor makes up only 5% of our total product cost, it drives all our costs. In addition, these rates give my design engineers incentives to "design out" direct labor by using machine technology. Yet, over the past years as we have had less and less direct labor, the overhead rate keeps going up and up. I won't be surprised if next year the rate is $4,000 per direct labor hour. I'm also concerned because small errors in our estimates of the direct labor content can have a large impact on our estimated costs. Just a 30~minute error in our estimate of assembly time is worth $ 1,500. Small mistakes in our direct labor time estimates really swing our bids around. I think this puts us at a disadvantage when we are going after business. What did the engineer mean about the large overhead rate being a disadvantage when plating bids and seeking new business?arrow_forward
- Financial & Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781285866307Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan DuchacPublisher:Cengage LearningSurvey of Accounting (Accounting I)AccountingISBN:9781305961883Author:Carl WarrenPublisher:Cengage LearningFinancial & Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337119207Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan DuchacPublisher:Cengage Learning