EBK BASICS OF ENGINEERING ECONOMY
2nd Edition
ISBN: 8220102797123
Author: Blank
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 15P
a:
To determine
Selection of the project.
b:
To determine
Calculate the present worth.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Two roadway designs are under consideration for access to a permanent suspension bridge. Design 1A will cost $3 million to build and $100,000 per year to maintain. Design 1B will cost $3.5 million to build and $40,000 per year to maintain. Both designs are assumed to be permanent. Use an AWbased rate of return equation to determine (a) the breakeven ROR, and (b) which design is preferred at a MARR of 10% per year.
Two methods can be used for producing expansion anchors. Method A costs $80,000 initially and will have a $15,000 salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method will be $30,000 per year. Method B will have a first cost of $120,000, an operating cost of $8000 per year, and a $40,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. At the MARR of 12% per year, which method should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis?
For the cash flows shown, use an annual worth comparison and an interest rate of 12% per year.
a) Determine the alternative that is economically best.
b) Determine the first cost required for each of the two alternatives not selected in part a) so that all 3 alternatives are equally acceptable.
Chapter 5 Solutions
EBK BASICS OF ENGINEERING ECONOMY
Ch. 5 - Prob. 1PCh. 5 - Prob. 2PCh. 5 - Prob. 3PCh. 5 - Prob. 4PCh. 5 - Prob. 5PCh. 5 - Prob. 6PCh. 5 - Prob. 7PCh. 5 - Prob. 8PCh. 5 - Prob. 9PCh. 5 - Prob. 10P
Ch. 5 - Two machines with the following cost estimates are...Ch. 5 - Prob. 12PCh. 5 - Prob. 13PCh. 5 - Prob. 14PCh. 5 - Prob. 15PCh. 5 - Prob. 16PCh. 5 - Prob. 17PCh. 5 - Prob. 18PCh. 5 - Estimates have been presented to Holly Farms,...Ch. 5 - Prob. 20PCh. 5 - Prob. 21PCh. 5 - Prob. 22PCh. 5 - Prob. 23PCh. 5 - Prob. 24PCh. 5 - Prob. 25PCh. 5 - Prob. 26PCh. 5 - A major repair on the suspension system of Janes...Ch. 5 - Prob. 28PCh. 5 - Prob. 29PCh. 5 - Prob. 30PCh. 5 - Prob. 31PCh. 5 - Prob. 32APQCh. 5 - Prob. 33APQCh. 5 - Prob. 34APQCh. 5 - Prob. 35APQCh. 5 - Prob. 36APQCh. 5 - The AW values of three revenue alternatives are ...Ch. 5 - Prob. 38APQCh. 5 - Prob. 39APQCh. 5 - Use an interest rate of 10% per year. The...Ch. 5 - Prob. 41APQCh. 5 - Prob. 42APQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Biomet Implants is planning new online patient diagnostics for surgeons while they operate. The new system will cost $300,000 to install in an operating room, $5000 annually for maintenance, and have an expected life of 4 years. The revenue per system is estimated to be $80,000 in year 1 and to increase by $10,000 per year through year 4. Determine if the project is economically justified using PW analysis and an MARR of 10% per year.arrow_forwardThe AW values of three cost alternatives are $−23,000 for alternative A, $−21,600 for B, and $−27,300 for C. On the basis of these results, the decision is to: (a) select alternative A (b) select alternative B (c) select alternative C (d) select the Do Nothing alternativearrow_forwardA window frame manufacturer is searching for ways to improve revenue from its triple-insulated sliding windows, sold primarily in the far northern areas of the United States. Alternative A is an in- crease in TV and radio marketing. A total of $300,000 spent now is expected to increase revenue by $60,000 per year. Alternative B requires the same investment for enhancements to the in-plant manufacturing process that wil improve the temperature retention properties of the seals around each glass pane. New revenues start slowly for this alternative at an estimated $10,000 the first year, with growth of $15,000 per year as the improved product gains reputation among builders. The MARR is 8% per year and the maximum projection period is 10 years for either alternative.arrow_forward
- Lego Group in Bellund, Denmark, manufactures Lego toy construction blocks. The company is considering two methods for producing special-purpose Lego parts. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $460,000, an annual operating cost of $100,000, and a life of 3 years. Method 2 will have an initial cost of $560,000, an operating cost of $90,000 per year, and a 6-year life. Assume 11% salvage values for both methods. Lego uses an MARR of 9% per year. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardUPS Freight plans to spend $100 million on new long-haul tractor-trailers. Some of these vehicles will include a new shelving design with adjustable shelves to transport irregularly sized freight that requires special handling during loading and unloading. Though the life is relatively short, the director wants a capitalized cost analysis performed on the two final designs. Compare the alternatives at the MARR of 10% per year using (a) tabulated factors, and (b) a spreadsheet.arrow_forwardEP Electric has identified two new methods to treat its cooling water. Alternative I (for inflow) would treat the raw water with a conventional reverse osmosis system so that the cycles of concentration could be increased from 5 to 20. This will result in water cost savings of $360,000 per year and chemical cost savings of $56,000 per year. The initial cost of the equipment will be $2.3 million with an operating cost of $125,000 per year. Alternative B (for blowdown) will treat the cooling tower blowdown water using a highpressure seawater reverse osmosis system to recover most of the water that is sent to an evaporation pond. This option will result in water savings of $270,000 per year. The cost of the system will be $1.2 million with an operating cost of $105,000 per year. Assuming one of the two methods must be installed, determine which is preferred on the basis of the incremental ROR value using MARR of 5% per year, which is a typically low return expected of government projects.…arrow_forward
- Because of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $29,000, 34,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively. Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. (Click to select) No Yes , the timing of the investment (Click to select) will not will affect the request to make at least 20% per year return. The investment must be made in (Click to select) 3 2 1 years.arrow_forwardBecause of international competition, a company that manufactures high-speed submersible rotary indexing spindles must upgrade its production equipment to reduce costs over a 6-year planning horizon. The company can invest $80,000 one year from now, 2 years from now, or 3 years from now. Depending on when the investment is made, the savings will vary. That is, the savings will be $20,000, 25,000, or $38,000 per year if the investment is made 1, 2, or 3 years from now, respectively. Will the timing of the investment affect the request to make at least 20% per year return? Use future worth analysis and solve using factors. Please provide excel formula.arrow_forwardTwo methods can be used for producing solar panels for electric power generation. Method 1 will have an initial cost of $550,000, an AOC of $160,000 per year, and $125,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. Method 2 will cost $830,000 with an AOC of $120,000, and a $240,000 salvage value after its 5-year life. Assume your boss asked you to determine which method is better, but she wants the analysis done over a 3-year planning period. You estimate the salvage value of method 2 will be 35% higher after 3 years than it is after 5 years. If the MARR is 10% per year, which method should the company selectarrow_forward
- The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is considering two designs for crash barriers along a reconstructed portion of I-10. Design 2B will cost $3 million to install and $125,500 per year to maintain. Design 4R will cost $3.7 million to install and $55,000 per year to maintain. Determine which design should be selected based on a rate of return analysis if TxDOT uses a MARR of 6% per year and a 20-year project period. The rate of return is Not attempted ______%.arrow_forwardA piece of onboard equipment has a first cost of $600,000, an annual cost of $92,000, and a salvage value that decreases to zero by $150,000 each year of the equipment’s maximum useful life of 5 years. Assume the company’s MARR is 10% per year. (a) Determine the ESL by hand. (b) Use a spreadsheet with a graph indicating the capital recovery, AOC, and total AW per year to determine the ESL.arrow_forwardA process can be completed using either Alternative X or Y, where Y is an automated version of X. Alternative X has fixed costs of $10,000 per year with a variable cost of $50 per unit. If the process is automated, the fixed cost for Y will be $5,000 per year and its variable cost will be only $30 per unit. The minimum number of units that must be produced each year for alternative Y to be favored is closest to:a. Alternative Y will be favored for any level of productionb. 125c. 375d. Alternative X will be favored for any level of productionarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education