MACROECONOMICS (LL)
MACROECONOMICS (LL)
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781260186949
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 5, Problem 3P

Sub part (a):

To determine

The Bribe income.

Sub part (a):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Bribing takes place when the individuals corrupts an official and make him favorable towards them. People use money or other valuable assets or materials to convince the official and make him issue the laws favorable to them.

The bribes cost $1,000 each. There are 52 weeks in a year in which bribing needs to done. The officer visits 2 houses in a week. Thus, the amount that the officer makes through bribing can be calculated by multiplying the total weeks with the number of visits per week and the amount received per bribe. This can be done as follows:

Total amount made by officer=No. of weeks×No. of times per week×amount per bribe=52×2×1,000=104,000

Thus, the amount made by the officer through the bribing is $104,000.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Bribing: It is a practice of providing money or such material benefits to the officials in order to make the person being corrupted in favor of the bribing person.

Sub part (b):

To determine

The Bribe income.

Sub part (b):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The number of housing inspectors is 20. Each of them provides half of their bribe to the construction supervisor. The amount made by the housing inspectors annually is $104,000.

Thus, the amount that the construction supervisor received can be calculated as follows:

Amount made by construction supervisor=(Amount made by per housing inspector×No.of inspectors×Percentage that the inspectors gives )=104,000×20×0.5=1,040,000

Thus, the construction supervisor makes $1,040,000 per year.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Bribing: It is a practice of providing money or such material benefits to the officials in order to make the person being corrupted in favor of the bribing person.

Sub part (c):

To determine

The Bribe income.

Sub part (c):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The Number of housing inspectors decreases from 20 to 10. The amount of bribe increases to $2,500 from $1,000. There are 52 weeks, 2 house visits per week and the inspectors gives 50 percent of the bribe to the construction supervisor.

The amount that the inspector makes per year through bribing can be calculated as follows:

Total amount made by officer=No. of weeks×No. of times per week×amount per bribe=52×2×2,500=260,000

Thus, the amount made by the officer through the bribing is $260,000.

Thus, the amount that the construction supervisor received can be calculated as follows:

Amount made bt construction supervisor=(Amount made by per housing inspector×No.of inspectors×Percentage that the inspectors gives )=260,000×10×0.5=1,300,000

Thus, the construction supervisor makes $1,300,000 per year.

The amount received by the construction supervisor in part b was only $1,040,000. But, in this case, it is $1,300,000. The difference in the amount received by the supervisor can be calculated by subtracting the old amount from the new amount as follows:

Difference in amount received by supervisor=New amountold amount=1,300,0001,040,000=260,000

Thus, the construction supervisor will earn $260,000 more than in part b income.

Since, the amount received by the construction supervisor is increased even with the decline in the number of inspectors, the construction supervisor will be happier with it.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Bribing: It is a practice of providing money or such material benefits to the officials in order to make the person being corrupted in favor of the bribing person.

Sub part (d):

To determine

The Bribe income.

Sub part (d):

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The number of housing inspectors decreases from 20 to 10. The amount of bribe increases to $1,500 from $1,000. There are 52 weeks, 2 house visits per week and the inspectors give 50 percent of the bribe to the construction supervisor.

The amount that the inspector makes per year through bribing can be calculated as follows:

Total amount made by officer=No. of weeks×No. of times per week×amount per bribe=52×2×1,500=156,000

Thus, the amount made by the officer through the bribing is $156,000.

Thus, the amount that the construction supervisor receives can be calculated as follows:

Amount made bt construction supervisor=(Amount made by per housing inspector×No.of inspectors×Percentage that the inspectors gives )=156,000×10×0.5=780,000

Thus, the construction supervisor makes $780,000 per year.

The amount received by the construction supervisor in part b was $1,040,000. But, in this case, it is only $780,000. The difference in the amount received by the supervisor can be calculated by subtracting the new amount from the previous amount as follows:

Difference in amount received by supervisor=old amountNew amount=1,040,000780,000=260,000

Thus, the construction supervisor will earn $260,000 less than in part b income.

Since the amount received by the construction supervisor is decreased with the decline in the number of inspectors, he will be unhappy.

Thus, he desires to use 20 housing inspectors again.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept introduction:

Bribing: It is a practice of providing money or such material benefits to the officials in order to make the person being corrupted in favor of the bribing person.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
4. No one has anything to fear from giving the police random stop-and-search powers so long as they have nothing to hide. If you are carrying a knife or gun or stolen goods, then of course it’s a different story. Opponents of the bill to grant the police more wide-ranging powers can only be helping to protect the guilty. Summarize this passage in12 words? Is it an argument? If so, what is its conclusion? If it isn’t an argument, why isn’t it?
5. Explain why a city that has a low price elasticity of supply in the housing market, like Detroit, might be more likely to have problems with government corruption.
A lobbyist in our nation’s capitol must buy 250 votes in the House of Representatives and Senate to win passage of a bill to add Millard Fillmore’s face to Mount Rushmore. Votes in Congress can be purchased according to the following process: V = CM/100,000, where C is the number of dollars contributed to campaign funds and M is the number of three-martini lunches. If three-martini lunches cost $25 each, what is the smallest expenditure the lobbyist could make to ensure Mr. Fillmore’s proper place in history? Option A) 1,000,000 Option B) 25,000,025 Option C) 130,000 Option D) 50,000 Option E) 25,000,000
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax