Study Guide for Microeconomics
9th Edition
ISBN: 9780134741123
Author: Robert Pindyck, Daniel Rubinfeld
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 7E
(a)
To determine
The expected return and the standard deviation of each investment.
(b)
To determine
The investment decision.
(c)
To determine
The investment decision.
(d)
To determine
The investment decision.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Leo owns one share of Anteras, a semiconductor chip company which may have to recall millions of chips. The stock currently trades at $100/share. Leo believes the probability that they have to recall the chips is 50%. If the chips have to be recalled, the stock price will be cut in half, but otherwise it will remain $100.
The expected value of Leo's share is ______
Assume Leo has the utility function, U(X)=√X. The minimum price Leo would accept to sell his share is _______
Leo's risk premium is ________
Solve the following problem using an excel spreadsheet. A tobacco company isinterested in hiring a salesperson to promote smoking cigarettes in nightclubs. The position pays a flat salary of $50,000, regardless of sales levels. The firm has two applicants, Predictable Patty and Risky Ricky. Predictable Patty can produce with 100% certainty $100,000 a year in sales. Risky Ricky, on the other hand, can produce $300,000 with probability of 50%. But if he turns out to spend his time drinking and dancing in the nightclubs instead of making sales, he could actually cost the firm -$100,000 per year.a) During their first year on the job, what are the expected sales of Patty and Ricky? What are the firm’s expected profits on each worker?b) Now assume both workers are currently 25, and they will work until the retirement age of 65. The firm has the option to fire its new employee after one year based on sales, but can only hire one employee. Assume that it takes only one year to discover whether…
Suppose the equilibrium price for good quality used cars is $20,000. And the equilibrium price for poor quality used cars is $10,000. Assume a potential used car buyer has imperfect information as to the condition of any given used car. Assume this potential buyer believes the probability a given used car is good quality is .60 and the probability a given used car is low quality is .40. Assume the seller has perfect information on all cars in inventory.
If the seller sells the buyer a poor quality car, what is the net-benefit to the seller?
a. A net gain of $6,000.
b. A net loss of $20,000.
c. A net loss of $6,000.
d. A net gain of $10,000.
Chapter 5 Solutions
Study Guide for Microeconomics
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Assume that two investment opportunities have identical expected values of $100,000. Investment A has a variance of 10,500, while investment B's standard deviation is 8,000. We would expect most investors (who dislike risk) to prefer investment opportunity Select one: A. A because it provides higher potential earnings. B. B because it has less risk. C. B because of its higher potential earnings. D. A because it has less risk.arrow_forwardGiven a choice between two investments with the same expected payoff: a. Most people will choose the one with the lower standard deviation b. Most people will opt for the one with the higher standard deviation c. Most people will be indifferent since the expected payoffs are the same d. Most people will calculate the variance to assess the relative risks of the two choicesarrow_forwardPriyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?arrow_forward
- Five of ten people earn $0, four earn $100, and one loses $100. What is the expected payoff? What is the variance of the payoff?arrow_forwardYou need to hire some new employees to staff your startup venture. You know that potential employees are distributed throughout the population as follows, but you can't distinguish among them: Employee Value Probability $65,000 0.25 $82,000 0.25 $99,000 0.25 $116,000 0.25 The expected value of hiring one employee is . Suppose you set the salary of the position equal to the expected value of an employee. Assume that employees will not work for a salary below their employee value. The expected value of an employee who would apply for the position, at this salary, is . Given this adverse selection, your most reasonable salary offer (that ensures you do not lose money) is .arrow_forwardA risk-averse manager is considering two projects. The first project involves expanding the market for bologna; the second involves expanding the market for caviar. There is a 10 percent chance of a recession and a 90 percent chance of an economic boom. During a boom, the bologna project will lose $10,000, whereas the caviar project will earn $20,000. During a recession, the bologna project will earn $12,000 and the caviar project will lose $8,000. If the alternative is earning $3,000 on a safe asset (say, a Treasury bill), what should the manager do? Why?arrow_forward
- You have a 50 percent chance of making $0, a 40 percent chance of making $100, and a 10 percent chance of losing $100. Calculate the expected value and variance of the payoff.arrow_forwardLet U(x)= x^(beta/2) denote an agent's utility function, where Beta > 0 is a parameter that defines the agent's attitude towards risk. Consider a gamble that pays a prize X = 10 with probability 0.2, a price X = 50 with probability 0.4 and a price X = 100 with probability 0.4. Compute the agentís expected utility for such gamble and find the value of Beta such that the agentis risk neutral? Suppose B= 1, what is the certainty equivalent of the gamble described above? What is the Arrow-Pratt measure of absolute risk aversion?arrow_forwardExercise 3: Risky Investment Charlie has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function u(x) = ln x and has wealth W = 250, 000. She is offered the opportunity to purchase a risky project for price P = 160, 000. 1 1 With probability p = 2 the project will be a success and return V > 160, 000. With probability 1 −p = 2 the project will fail and be worthless (i.e. it returns 0). For simplicity assume there is no interest between the time of the investment and the time of its return, that is r = 0 . How large must V be in order for Charlie to want to purchase the risky project? [Hint: What is Charlie’s expected utility is she does not purchase the project? What is Charlie’s expected utility is she purchases the project?]arrow_forward
- A pension fund manager is considering three mutual funds. The first is a stock fund, the second is a long-term government and corporate bond, and the third is a T-bill money market fund that yields a rate of 8%. The mean and the standard deviation of the risky funds is as follows: Expected Return Standard Deviation Stock fund (S) 20% 30% Bond fund (B) 12% 15% The correlation between the fund returns is 0.10. Your client’s degree of risk aversion is A = 3.5. Given the utility function: U = E(r) - 1/2 A Sigma^2 What proportion, y, of the total investment should be invested in the tangency portfolio so that your client can maximize his/her expected utility? What is the expected value and standard deviation of the rate of return on your client’s optimized portfolio?arrow_forwardYou are considering a $500,000 investment in the fast-food industry and have narrowed your choice to either a McDonald’s or a Penn Station East Coast Subs franchise. McDonald’s indicates that, based on the location where you are proposing to open a new restaurant, there is a 25 percent probability that aggregate 10-year profits (net of the initial investment) will be $16 million, a 50 percent probability that profits will be $8 million, and a 25 percent probability that profits will be −$1.6 million. The aggregate 10-year profit projections (net of the initial investment) for a Penn Station East Coast Subs franchise is $48 million with a 2.5 percent probability, $8 million with a 95 percent probability, and −$48 million with a 2.5 percent probability. Considering both the risk and expected profitability of these two investment opportunities, which is the better investment? Explain carefully.arrow_forwardBeta and volatility differ as risk measures in that beta measures only non‑systematic risk, while volatility measures total risk. True Falsearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning