A manager is trying to decide whether to purchase a certain part or to have it produced internally. Internal production could use either of two processes. One would entail a variable cost of $17 per unit and an annual fixed cost of $200,000; the other would entail a variable cost of $14 per unit and an annual fixed cost of $240,000. Three vendors are willing to provide the part. Vendor A has a price of $20 per unit for any volune up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit for demand of 1,000 units or less, and $18 per unit for larger quantities. Vendor C offers a price of $21 per unit for the first 1,000 units, and $19 per unit for additional units.
a)
To determine: The best alternative from a cost standpoint for an annual volume of 10,000 units and 20,000 units.
Introduction: Decision-making is the process that helps to make decision. It is the process of choosing a best alternative by evaluating many alternatives.
Answer to Problem 8P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A manager has to decide whether to purchase a product or produce it internally. Internal production consists of two processes. Variable cost and fixed cost of the first process is $17 and $200,000 respectively. Variable cost and fixed cost of the second process is $14 and $240,000 respectively.
There are three vendors available to purchase a product. Vendor A has a price of $20 per unit up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit if the demand is 1,000 units or less and $18 for larger volumes. Vendor C has a price of $21 per unit for first 1,000 units and $19 per unit for additional units.
Determine the best alternative from a cost standpoint for an annual volume of 10,000 units:
Calculate the total cost for the first internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 10,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $370,000.
Calculate the total cost for the second internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 10,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $380,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor A:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. Hence, the total cost for Vendor A is $200,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor B:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $22 if the volume is less than 1,000 and $18 if the volume is larger. As the annual volume is more than 1,000, the price is $18. Hence, the total cost for Vendor B is $180,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor C:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $21 for the volume up to 1,000 and $19 for the additional volume. Thus, price is $21 for the 1,000 units and $19 for additional 9,000 units. Hence, the total cost for Vendor C is $192,000.
At the annual volume of 10,000 units, Vendor B has the lowest total cost of ($180,000). Hence, it should be chosen from a cost standpoint.
Determine the best alternative from a cost standpoint for an annual volume of 20,000 units:
Calculate the total cost for the first internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 20,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $540,000.
Calculate the total cost for the second internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 20,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $520,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor A:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. Hence, the total cost for Vendor A is $400,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor B:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $22 if the volume is less than 1,000 and $18 if the volume is larger. As the annual volume is more than 1,000, the price is $18. Hence, the total cost for Vendor B is $360,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor C:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $21 for the volume up to 1,000 and $19 for the additional volume. Thus, price is $21 for the 1,000 units and $19 for additional 19,000 units. Hence, the total cost for Vendor C is $382,000.
At the annual volume of 20,000 units, Vendor B has the lowest total cost of ($360,000). Hence, it should be chosen from a cost standpoint.
b)
To determine: The range of the best alternative.
Introduction:Decision-making is the process that helps to make decision. It is the process of choosing a best alternative by evaluating many alternatives.
Answer to Problem 8P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A manager has to decide whether to purchase a product or produce it internally. Internal production consists of two processes. Variable cost and fixed cost of the first process is $17 and $200,000 respectively. Variable cost and fixed cost of the second process is $14 and $240,000 respectively.
There are three vendors available to purchase a product. Vendor A has a price of $20 per unit up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit if the demand is 1,000 units or less and $18 for larger volumes. Vendor C has a price of $21 per unit for first 1,000 units and $19 per unit for additional units.
Cost function for each alternative if the annual volume is 1-1,000 units:
First internal process:
Second internal process:
Vendor A:
Vendor B:
Vendor C:
When considering the cost functions, Vendor A would exhibit less cost when compare to Vendor B and Vendor C. Vendor A should be preferred over other alternatives. The graph is as follows:
Cost function for each alternative if the annual volume is more than 1,000 units:
First internal process:
Second internal process:
Vendor A:
Vendor B:
Vendor C:
When considering the cost functions, Vendor B would dominate Vendor A and Vendor C. Hence, Vendor A and Vendor C should be eliminated. The graph considering two internal processes and Vendor B is as follows:
Determine the value of Q by equaling two cost equations:
Equal the cost function of second internal process and Vendor B to determine the value of Q.
Calculate the total cost of first internal process:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of first internal process. Hence, the total cost is $1,220,000.
Calculate the total cost of second internal process:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of second internal process. Hence, the total cost is $1,080,000.
Calculate the total cost of Vendor A:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of Vendor A. Hence, the total cost is $1,200,000.
Calculate the total cost of Vendor B:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of Vendor B. Hence, the total cost is $1,080,000.
Calculate the total cost of Vendor C:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of Vendor C. Hence, the total cost is $1,142,000.
Inference:
- Vendor A should be preferred when the purchasing quantity ranges from 1 to 1,000 units.
- Vendor B should be preferred when the purchasing quantity ranges from 1,001 to 59,999 units.
- There would indifferent between Vendor B and second internal process if the quantity is 60,000 units.
- Second internal process should be preferred if the quantity is more than 60,000 units.
First internal process and Vendor C are never best.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 5 Solutions
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (LL) >CUSTOM<
- Two manufacturing processes are being considered for making a new product. Process A is less capital intensive, with fixed costs of $60,000 per year and variable costs of $700 per unit. Process B has fixed costs of $400,000 annually, with variable costs of $300 per unit. What is the break-even quantity for the two processes? If annual sales are expected to be 700 units, which process should be selected? Operations and Engineering have found a way to reduce the cost of Process B, such that the fixed costs for this process decrease from $400,000 to $300,000 annually. All other costs remain the same. Does this change the process selection for the annual sales volume of 700 units?arrow_forwardSpartan Castings must implement a manufacturing process that reduces the amount of particulates emitted into the atmosphere. Two processes have been identified that provide the same level of particulate reduction. The first process is expected to incur $350,000 of fixed cost and add $50 of variable cost to each casting Spartan produces. The second process has fixed costs of $150,000 and adds $90 of variable cost per casting.a. What is the break-even quantity beyond which the first process is more attractive?b. What is the difference in total cost if the quantity produced is 10,000?arrow_forwardTwo different manufacturing processes are being considered for making a new product. The first process is less capital-intensive, with fixed costs of only $50,000 per year and variable costs of $700 per unit. The second process has fixed costs of $400,000 but has variable costs of only $200 per unit.a. What is the break-even quantity beyond which the second process becomes more attractive than the first?b. If the expected annual sales for the product is 800 units, which process would you choose?arrow_forward
- A manager is trying to decide whether to purchase a certain part or to have it produced internally Internal production could use either of two processes. One would entail a variable cost of $17 per unit and an annual fixed cost of $200,000, the other would entail a variable cost of $14 per unit and an annual fixed cost of $240,000. Three vendors are willing to provide the part. Vendor A has a price of $20 per unit for any volume up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit for demand of 1,000 units or less, and $18 per unit for larger quantities. Vendor Coffers a price of $21 per unit for the first 1,000 units, and $19 per unit for additional units a. If the manager anticipates an annual volume of 10,000 units, which alternative would be best from a cost standpoint?" For 20,000 units, which alternative would be best" b. Determine the range for which each alternative is best. Are there any alternatives that are never best? Which?arrow_forwardtwo different manufacturing processes are being considered for making a new product. the first process is less capital intensive, with fixed costs of only $50,000 per year and variable costs of $700 per unit. the second process has fixed costs of $400,00 but has variable costs of only $200 per unit a. what is the break even quantity beyond which the second process becomes more attractive than the first? b. if the expected annual sales for the product is 800 units, which process would you choose?arrow_forwardTwo different manufacturing processes are being considered formaking a new product. The first process is less capital-intensive,with fixed costs of only $46,400 per year and variable costs of$720 per unit. The second process has fixed costs of $400,100but has variable costs of only $210 per unit.a. What is the break-even quantity, beyond which the sec-ond process becomes more attractive than the first?b. If the expected annual sale for the product is 840 units,which process would you choose?arrow_forward
- The following processes - Tameka, Tamia, and Christian - have the following cost structure: Show all work in Excel with formulas Process Fixed Cost per Year Variable Cost per Unit Tameka $120,000 $3.00 Tamia 90,000 4.00 Christian 80,000 4.50 a. What is the most economical process for a volume of 8,000 units? b. How many units per year must be sold with each process to have annual profits of $50,000 if the selling price is $6.95 per unit? c. What is the break-even volume for each process?arrow_forwardA manager is trying to decide whether to purchase a certain part or to have it produced internally.Internal production could use either of two processes. One would entail a variable cost of $17 perunit and an annual fixed cost of $200,000; the other would entail a variable cost of $14 per unitand an annual fixed cost of $240,000. Three vendors are willing to provide the part. Vendor A hasa price of $20 per unit for any volume up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit for demand of 1,000 units or less, and $18 per unit for larger quantities. Vendor C offers a price of$21 per unit for the first 1,000 units, and $19 per unit for additional units.a. If the manager anticipates an annual volume of 10,000 units, which alternative would be bestfrom a cost standpoint? For 20,000 units, which alternative would be best?arrow_forwardWhat type of process—project, job shop, flow shop, and continuous flow—would most likely be used to produce the following? Explain your reasoning. Personal computers - Weddings- Paper-Continuous Paper Books- Tax preparation - What type of process – project, job shop, flow shop, and continuous flow – would most likely be used to produce the following? Gasoline- Air-conditioners - Specialized machine tools- Ships- Producing many flavors of ice cream-arrow_forward
- A linear programming computer package is needed. EZ-Windows, Inc., manufactures replacement windows for the home remodeling business. In January, the company produced 15,000 windows and ended the month with 9,000 windows in inventory. EZ-Windows' management team would like to develop a production schedule for the next three months. A smooth production schedule is obviously desirable because it maintains the current workforce and provides a similar month-to-month operation. However, given the sales forecasts, the production capacities, and the storage capabilities as shown, the management team does not think a smooth production schedule with the same production quantity each month possible. February March April Sales forecast 15,000 16,500 20,000 Production capacity 14,000 14,000 18,000 Storage capacity 6,000 6,000 6,000 The company's cost accounting department estimates that increasing production by one window from one month to the next will increase total costs by $1.00…arrow_forwardA linear programming computer package is needed. EZ-Windows, Inc., manufactures replacement windows for the home remodeling business. In January, the company produced 15,000 windows and ended the month with 9,000 windows in inventory. EZ-Windows' management team would like to develop a production schedule for the next three months. A smooth production schedule is obviously desirable because it maintains the current workforce and provides a similar month-to-month operation. However, given the sales forecasts, the production capacities, and the storage capabilities as shown, the management team does not think a smooth production schedule with the same production quantity each month possible. February March April Sales forecast 15,000 16,500 20,000 Production capacity 14,000 14,000 18,000 Storage capacity 6,000 6,000 6,000 The company's cost accounting department estimates that increasing production by one window from one month to the next will increase total costs by $1.00…arrow_forwardA linear programming computer package is needed. EZ-Windows, Inc., manufactures replacement windows for the home remodeling business. In January, the company produced 15,000 windows and ended the month with 9,000 windows in inventory. EZ-Windows' management team would like to develop a production schedule for the next three months. A smooth production schedule is obviously desirable because it maintains the current workforce and provides a similar month-to-month operation. However, given the sales forecasts, the production capacities, and the storage capabilities as shown, the management team does not think a smooth production schedule with the same production quantity each month possible. February March April Sales forecast 15,000 16,500 20,000 Production capacity 14,000 14,000 18,000 Storage capacity 6,000 6,000 6,000 The company's cost accounting department estimates that increasing production by one window from one month to the next will increase total costs by $1.00…arrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,