PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION F/BUS...(LL)
23rd Edition
ISBN: 9781260433197
Author: Jones
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 1IRP
To determine
Identify the tax issues of Firm G and state the issue in the form of a question(s).
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
At the beginning of 2017, Wertz Construction Company changed from the completed-contract method to recognizing revenue over time (percentage-of-completion) for financial reporting purposes. The company will continue to use the completed-contract method for tax purposes. For years prior to 2017, pretax income under the two methods was as follows: percentage-of-completion $120,000, and completed-contract $80,000. The tax rate is 35%. Prepare Wertz’s 2017 journal entry to record the change in accounting principle.
Cheyenne Services Ltd. follows ASPE and had earned accounting income before taxes of $493,000 for the year ended December 31
2020.
During 2020, Cheyenne paid $82,000 for meals and entertainment expenses.
In 2017, Cheyenne's tax accountant made a mistake when preparing the company's income tax return. In 2020, Cheyenne paid
$10,400 in penalties related to this error. These penalties were not deductible for tax purposes.
Cheyenne owned a warehouse building for which it had no current use, so the company chose to use the building as a rental
property. At the beginning of 2020, Cheyenne rented the building to Trung Inc. for two years at $62,700 per year. Trung paid the
entire two years' rent in advance.
Cheyenne used the straight-line depreciation method for accounting purposes and recorded depreciation expense of $303,500. For
tax purposes, Cheyenne claimed the maximum capital cost allowance of $453,900. This asset had been purchased at the beginning
of the year for $3,024,000.
In 2020,…
In 2021, Ryan Management collected rent revenue for 2022 tenant occupancy. For financial reporting, the rent is recorded as deferred revenue and then recognized as revenue in the period tenants occupy rental property. For tax reporting, the rent is taxed when collected in 2021. The deferred portion of the rent collected in 2021 was $130.0 million. No temporary differences existed at the beginning of the year, and the tax rate is 25%. Suppose the deferred portion of the rent collected was $60 million at the end of 2022. Taxable income is $520 million. Prepare the appropriate journal entry to record income taxes in 2022.
Chapter 6 Solutions
PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION F/BUS...(LL)
Ch. 6 - Prob. 1QPDCh. 6 - Prob. 2QPDCh. 6 - Prob. 3QPDCh. 6 - Prob. 4QPDCh. 6 - For many years, Mr. K, the president of KJ Inc.,...Ch. 6 - Prob. 6QPDCh. 6 - Prob. 7QPDCh. 6 - Firm NB, which uses the cash method of accounting,...Ch. 6 - Prob. 9QPDCh. 6 - Prob. 10QPD
Ch. 6 - Prob. 11QPDCh. 6 - Firms generally prefer to engage in transactions...Ch. 6 - Describe the contrasting treatment of prepaid...Ch. 6 - Net operating losses can be carried forward...Ch. 6 - Nello Company owed 23,400 overdue rent to its...Ch. 6 - For each of the following businesses, indicate the...Ch. 6 - Assuming a 21 percent marginal tax rate, compute...Ch. 6 - Prob. 4APCh. 6 - FruAgro Company has average annual gross receipts...Ch. 6 - Prob. 6APCh. 6 - Firm F is a cash basis legal firm. In 2018, it...Ch. 6 - Prob. 8APCh. 6 - Prob. 9APCh. 6 - Prob. 10APCh. 6 - Brillo Company uses the calendar year and the cash...Ch. 6 - NC Company, a retail hardware store, began...Ch. 6 - Prob. 13APCh. 6 - Warren Company is a calendar year, cash basis...Ch. 6 - Prob. 15APCh. 6 - Wahoo Inc., a calendar year taxpayer, leases...Ch. 6 - Prob. 17APCh. 6 - Using a 21 percent rate, compute the deferred tax...Ch. 6 - Prob. 19APCh. 6 - Prob. 20APCh. 6 - Prob. 21APCh. 6 - Prob. 22APCh. 6 - Prob. 23APCh. 6 - Prob. 24APCh. 6 - Prob. 25APCh. 6 - Prob. 26APCh. 6 - Prob. 27APCh. 6 - BZD, a calendar year corporation, made the...Ch. 6 - Prob. 29APCh. 6 - Prob. 30APCh. 6 - Prob. 31APCh. 6 - Prob. 32APCh. 6 - Prob. 33APCh. 6 - GK Company, a calendar year accrual basis...Ch. 6 - Prob. 35APCh. 6 - Prob. 36APCh. 6 - TRW Inc. began business in 2019 and incurred net...Ch. 6 - Prob. 38APCh. 6 - Prob. 39APCh. 6 - Margaret, a married taxpayer filing a joint...Ch. 6 - Prob. 41APCh. 6 - Prob. 1IRPCh. 6 - Corporation DS owns assets worth 550,000 and has...Ch. 6 - Two years ago, a professional theater company paid...Ch. 6 - Prob. 4IRPCh. 6 - Prob. 5IRPCh. 6 - Prob. 6IRPCh. 6 - Every December, Maxo Inc., an accrual basis,...Ch. 6 - Prob. 8IRPCh. 6 - Prob. 9IRPCh. 6 - Corporation WJ began business in 2019 and elected...Ch. 6 - Prob. 11IRPCh. 6 - Bontaine Publications, an accrual basis, calendar...Ch. 6 - Prob. 2RPCh. 6 - Prob. 3RPCh. 6 - Prob. 4RPCh. 6 - Company Y began business in February 2019. By the...Ch. 6 - Prob. 2TPC
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Flint Enterprises Ltd., a private company following ASPE earned accounting income before taxes of $1,712,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. During 2020, Flint paid $240,000 for meals and entertainment expenses. In 2017, Flint’s tax accountant made a mistake when preparing the company’s income tax return. In 2020, Flint paid $17,000 in penalties related to this error. These penalties were not deductible for tax purposes. Flint owned a warehouse building for which it had no current use, so the company chose to use the building as a rental property. At the beginning of 2020, Flint rented the building to SPK Inc. for two years at $260,000 per year. SPK paid the entire two years’ rent in advance. Flint used the straight-line depreciation method for accounting purposes and recorded depreciation expense of $396,000. For tax purposes, Flint claimed the maximum capital cost allowance of $621,000. Flint began to sell its products with a two-year warranty against manufacturing…arrow_forwardIn 2018, Ryan Management collected rent revenue for 2019 tenant coccupancy. For financial reporting, the rent is recorded as deferred revenue and then reconized as income in the period tenants occupy rental property, but for income tax reporting it is taxed when collected. the deferred portion of the rent collected in 2018 was 65 million. taxable income is 190 million. no temporary differences existed at the beginning of the year, and the tax rate is 40 percent. suppose the deferred portion of the rent collected was 55 million at the end of 2019. taxable income is 210 million. prepare the appropriate journal entry to record income taxes?arrow_forwardIn 2021, Ryan Management collected rent revenue for 2022 tenant occupancy. For financial reporting, the rent is recorded as deferred revenue and then recognized as revenue in the period tenants occupy rental property. For tax reporting, the rent is taxed when collected in 2021. The deferred portion of the rent collected in 2021 was $306.0 million. No temporary differences existed at the beginning of the year, and the tax rate is 25%. Suppose the deferred portion of the rent collected was $104 million at the end of 2022. Taxable income is $1,180 million. Prepare the appropriate journal entry to record income taxes in 2022. (If no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "No journal entry required" in the first account field. Enter your answers in millions rounded to 1 decimal place (i.e., 5,500,000 should be entered as 5.5).)arrow_forward
- For many years preceding 2018, Minimis Corporation, a calendar year corporation, had incurred the alternative minimum tax (AMT) and as a result had a $2 million minimum tax carryover into 2018. However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 repealed the corporate AMT for tax years beginning after 2017. Minimis expects its regular tax liability to be $100,000 per year for 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021. Your supervisor has asked you to determine how Minimis treats the minimum tax credit carryover in these four years now that the corporate AMT has been repealed. Your supervisor has suggested that you start by looking at IRC Sec. 53.arrow_forwardCallen Inc. had accumulated minimum tax credits of $1.37 million from tax years prior to 2018. For 2018, its regular tax before credits was $135,000. For 2019, its regular tax before credits was $155,000. If Callen does not elect the quickie refund options provided by the CARES Act with respect to 2018 minimum tax credits, determine the total amount of minimum tax credit it would claim in 2018 and 2019?arrow_forwardAt the beginning of 2020, Bramble Construction Company changed from the completed-contract method to recognizing revenue over time (percentage-of-completion) for financial reporting purposes. The company will continue to use the completed-contract method for tax purposes. For years prior to 2020, pretax income under the two methods was as follows: percentage-of-completion $114,200, and completed-contract $78,200. The tax rate is 40%. Bramble has a profit-sharing plan, which pays all employees a bonus at year-end based on 2% of pretax income.Compute the indirect effect of Bramble’s change in accounting principle that will be reported in the 2020 income statement, assuming that the profit-sharing contract explicitly requires adjustment for changes in income numbers. Indirect effect $enter the Indirect effect in dollarsarrow_forward
- During 2019 Lian Company became involved in a tax dispute with the BIR. At December 31, 2019, Lian’s tax advisor believed that an unfavorable outcome was probable and the best estimate of additional tax was 750,000, but could be as much as 975,000. After the 2019 financial statements were issued, Leal received and accepted a BIR settlement offer of 825,000. What amount of accrued liability would Leal have reported in its December 31, 2019 statement of financial position?arrow_forwardSunrise Company provided the following information on December 31, 2019: A personal injury liability suit for P500,000 was brought against Sunrise Company in March 2019. The management and legal counsel of Sunrise Company concluded that it is not probable that Sunrise Company will be responsible for damages and that P150,000 is the best estimate of the damages. In July 2019, Sunrise Company became involved in a tax dispute with the BIR pertaining to 2018 income tax. In December 2019, a judgment for P400,000 was assessed against Sunrise Company by the tax court. Sunrise Company is appealing the amount of judgment. The tax advisor and legal counsel of Sunrise Company believed it is probable that the assessment can be reduced on appeal by 50%. Sunrise Company signed as guarantor for P200,000 loan by PNB to Sunset Company, a principal supplier of Sunrise. By reason of financial difficulties, it is probable that Sunrise Company shall pay P200,000 loan with only a 60% recovery anticipated…arrow_forwardIn September of 2021, Calhoun Financial Services became involved in a tax dispute with the IRS. On December 31, 2021, the tax attorney for Calhoun indicated that an unfavorable outcome to the dispute was probable. At that time, the additional taxes were estimated to be $570,000 but could be as high as $770,000. After the year-end, but before the 2021 financial statements were issued, Calhoun revised its tax liability estimate to $650,000. Calhoun should have accrued a related liability on its December 31, 2021 balance sheet that was issued on March 4, 2022: A) $0. B $570,000. $770,000. $650,000.arrow_forward
- Sunland Services Ltd. follows ASPE and had earned accounting income before taxes of $520,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023. During 2023, Sunland paid $77,000 for meals and entertainment expenses. In 2020, Sunland's tax accountant made a mistake when preparing the company's income tax return. In 2023, Sunland paid $10,500 in penalties related to this error. These penalties were not deductible for tax purposes. Sunland owned a warehouse building for which it had no current use, so the company chose to use the building as a rental property. At the beginning of 2023, Sunland rented the building to Trung Inc. for two years at $64,500 per year. Trung paid the entire two years' rent in advance. Sunland used the straight-line depreciation method for accounting purposes and recorded depreciation expense of $286,200. For tax purposes, Sunland claimed the maximum capital cost allowance of $431,400. This asset had been purchased at the beginning of the year for $3,004,400. In 2023, Sunland…arrow_forwardSunland Services Ltd. follows ASPE and had earned accounting income before taxes of $520,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023. During 2023, Sunland paid $77,000 for meals and entertainment expenses. In 2020, Sunland's tax accountant made a mistake when preparing the company's income tax return. In 2023, Sunland paid $10,500 in penalties related to this error. These penalties were not deductible for tax purposes. Sunland owned a warehouse building for which it had no current use, so the company chose to use the building as a rental property. At the beginning of 2023, Sunland rented the building to Trung Inc. for two years at $64,500 per year. Trung paid the entire two years' rent in advance. Sunland used the straight-line depreciation method for accounting purposes and recorded depreciation expense of $286,200. For tax purposes, Sunland claimed the maximum capital cost allowance of $431,400. This asset had been purchased at the beginning of the year for $3,004,400. In 2023, Sunland…arrow_forwardIn 2018, North Company rented a villa for three years and received a total of $60,000. The rent is earned equally over the period 2018-2020. For tax purposes, North should report the full $60,000 on 2018 tax return form. By year end, the company reported an income tax expense of $22,000 and income tax payable of $37,000.In 2019, the company terminated a maintenance contract and agreed to pay $10,000 per year for 2019-2021. The total termination amount is fully deducted for financial reporting purposes and deducted as paid for tax purposes. The pretax financial income for 2019 is $90,000. The tax rates are 30% for 2018 and 35% for 2019. By end of 2019, the government announced the change of tax rate for future periods. 1. Prepare the journal entry to record income taxes for 2019 2. Which approach have you applied in answering part? and what are the main objectives of this approach?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
