Bundle: Auditing: A Risk Based-approach, 11th + Mindtap Accounting, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781337734455
Author: Karla M Johnstone-zehms, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 33FF
a.
To determine
Introduction:
To describe: The audit procedures and audit evidence which can detect the misstatements identified in report of SEC.
b.
To determine
Introduction: Auditor’s assessment of management’s integrity has an inverse relationship with the quantity and quality of audit procedures performed by the auditor.
To describe:Impact of auditor’s assessment of management’s integrity on audit procedures and role of professional skepticism.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
CENDANT CORPORATION (LO 1, 2, 3) Cendant Corporation, a company that sold travel and health club memberships, was the subject of an intensive fraud investigation that culminated in 1998. The company’s website revealed the following statements contained in a report given to the SEC:
Irregular charges against merger reserves—Operating results at the former Cendant business units were artificially boosted by recording fictitious revenues through inappropriately reversing restructuring charges and liabilities to revenues. Many other irregularities were also generated by inappropriate use of these reserves.
False coding of services sold to customers—Significant revenues from members purchasing long-term benefits were intentionally misclassified in accounting records as revenue from shorter-term products. The falsely recorded revenues generated higher levels of immediately recognized revenues and profits for Cendant.
Delayed recognition of canceled memberships and chargebacks (a…
The following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Rite-Aid in 1999. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think Rite-Aid would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud.Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Rite Aid
should have written off the pertinent "dead deal" expenses at the time that it
decided not to build on each specific site. Such writeoffs would have reduced
reported income in the relevant periods. Instead, Rite Aid continued to carry these
items on its balance sheet as assets. By the end of FY 1999, the accumulated
dead deal expenses totaled $10.6 millio
The following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Rite-Aid in 1999. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think Rite-Aid would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud. In the fourth quarter of FY 1999, Rite Aid prematurely recognized $17 million relating to a litigation settlement with a vendor. Rite Aid should not have recognized this sum in that period because the settlement offer was expressly contingent upon the execution of a formal settlement agreement which did not take place until May 20, 1999. Moreover, the litigation settlement was also contingent upon the execution of a purchasing agreement that was not finalized until May 18, 1999. Both of these contingencies were expressly stated in the February 26, 1999 letter of intent signed by Grass.
Chapter 6 Solutions
Bundle: Auditing: A Risk Based-approach, 11th + Mindtap Accounting, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
Ch. 6 - Prob. 1CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 2CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 3CYBKCh. 6 - Which of the following statements is true...Ch. 6 - Prob. 5CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 6CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 7CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 8CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 9CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 10CYBK
Ch. 6 - Prob. 11CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 12CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 13CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 14CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 15CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 16CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 17CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 18CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 19CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 20CYBKCh. 6 - Prob. 1RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 2RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 3RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 4RQSCCh. 6 - Refer to Exhibit 6.2 and describe the differences...Ch. 6 - Prob. 6RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 7RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 8RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 10RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 11RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 12RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 13RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 14RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 15RQSCCh. 6 - Indicate how the auditor could use substantive...Ch. 6 - Prob. 17RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 18RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 19RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 20RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 21RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 22RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 23RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 24RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 25RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 26RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 27RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 28RQSCCh. 6 - Prob. 29FFCh. 6 - Prob. 30FFCh. 6 - Prob. 31FFCh. 6 - Prob. 32FFCh. 6 - Prob. 33FFCh. 6 - MINISCRIBE (LO 1, 2) As reported in the Wall...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Rite-Aid in 1999. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think Rite-Aid would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud. Rite Aid failed to record an accrued expense for stock appreciation rights it had granted to employees, in a program that gave the recipients the right to receive cash or stock in amounts tied to increases in the market price of Rite Aid stock. Rite Aid should have accrued an expense of $22 million in FY 1998 and $33 million in FY 1999 for these obligations.arrow_forwarde. Of the following, the most significant risk factor relating to the risk of misstatement arising from fraudulent financial reporting for SSC is that: Multiple Choice Company officers serve on the board of directors. The company must refinance a significant portion of its debt. The company operates in the Bisbee, Arizona, area. The company paid no dividend this year. Untitled docume...pdf Untitled docume....pdf docx Presentation se....pdf Untitled docume...pdf 身arrow_forwardJane Ellerby and Sam Callison are discussing the recent fraud that occurred at LowRental Leasing, Inc. The fraud involved the improper reporting of revenue to ensure that the company would have income in excess of $1 million. What is fraudulent financial reporting, and how does it differ from an embezzlement of company funds?arrow_forward
- The following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Rite-Aid in 1999. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think Rite-Aid would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud. From at least the first quarter of FY 1998 through the first quarter of FY 2000, Rite Aid also made improper adjusting entries known as "gross profit" entries. This practice had the effect of lowering cost of goods sold and accounts payable. These entries caused material overstatements of Rite Aid's net income in each quarterly period in which they were made. In the second quarter of FY 1999, for example, Rite Aid improperly reduced cost of goods sold and accounts payable by approximately $100 million. As a result of these "gross profit" entries alone, Rite Aid overstated pre-tax income by $100 million in the second quarter of FY 1999. In each of the relevant…arrow_forwardWhich of the following is NOT a method UCI's former executive VP and CFO used to embezzle 2.97 million? options: 1) Charging personal purchases on UCI's corporate credit card, followed by arranging for UCI to pay the credit card statement by check 2) Preparing false expense reports and submitting them for reimbursement, resulting in payment to himself since nobody other than the accounts payable supervisor reviewed these reports 3) Adding family members to UCI's payroll and placing large checks into their bank accounts 4) Submitting unsupported check requests for personal credit card accounts and nonbusiness expenditures, such as construction work on his personal residencearrow_forwardWhile spotting red flags is difficult, vertical and horizontal financial statement analysis introduces a straightforward approach to fraud detection. Evaluate Company A’s Five Year Financial Data, please see the attached. (a) Perform horizontal analysis of the above data to indicate any potential red flags regarding possible overstatement of sales. (b) Perform vertical analysis of the above data to indicate any potential red flags regarding possible overstatement of the COGS.arrow_forward
- The Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act was passed by Congress in 2002 in response to the accounting and reporting failures associated wit high-profile investor fraud schemes carried-out by companies such as Enron an WorldCom. True Falsearrow_forwardThe following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Rite-Aid in 1999. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think Rite-Aid would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud. Rite Aid retroactively increased the estimated lives (periods of time) over which some groups of assets were depreciated. These retroactive depreciation changes violated GAAP, which requires such changes to be done prospectively. There was no legitimate business purpose or supporting documentation for these changes. The effect of the retroactive depreciation changes resulted in increases to income, and caused some asset groups to have a negative depreciation expense. These changes resulted in an approximately $14.6 million overstatement of FY 1998 pre-tax income.arrow_forwardEXPENSE ACCOUNT FRAUD While auditing the financial statements of Petty Corporation, the certified public accounting firm of True Blue and Smith discovered that its client's legal expense account was abnormally high. Further investigation of the records indicated the following: Since the begining of the year, several disbursements totaling $15,000 had been made to the law firm of Swindle, Fox, and Kreip. Swindle, Fox, and Kriep were not Pretty Corporation's attorneys. A review of the canceled checks showed that they had beeb written and approved by Mary Boghas, the cash disbursements clerk. Boghas's other duties included performing the end-of-month bank reconciliation. Subsequent investigation revealed that Swindle, Fox, and Kreip are representing Mary Boghas in an unrelated embezzlement case in which she is the defendant. The checks had been written in payment of her personal legal fees. Required a. What control procedures could Pretty Corporation have employed to prevent this…arrow_forward
- Read the facts of the case in Problem 2-26 to become familiar withthe fraud involving Koss Corporation. From the company’s October 7,2009, proxy statement (Def 14A filing with the SEC), we know the followingfacts about the company’s audit committee and its members:Thomas L. Doerr 65, has been a director of the company since 1987. In1972, Mr. Doerr co-founded Leeson Electric Corporation and served asits president and CEO until 1982. The company manufactures industrialelectric motors. In 1983, Mr. Doerr incorporated Doerr Corporation asa holding company for the purpose of acquiring established companiesinvolved in distributing products to industrial and commercial markets.Currently, Mr. Doerr serves as president of Doerr Corporation.Mr. Doerr owns no stock in Koss Corporation and received $24,000 incash compensation during 2009 to serve on the audit committee.Lawrence S. Mattson 77, has been a director of the company since 1978.Mr. Mattson is the retired president of Oster company, a…arrow_forwardEnron and Arthur Andersen UP Enron was an energy comp any based in Houston, Texas, that made energy trades. It was formed in 1985 with the merger of Houston Natural Gas and lnterNorth. After an aggressive expansion plan that involved risky financing transactions outside the original, fundamental business model of the company, Enron was billions of dollars in debt. Enron concealed this debt through hidden transactions with related-party partnerships, fraudulent accounting, and illegal loans. Enron is considered to be one of the largest and most important financial reporting frauds in history. The company ultimately filed for bankruptcy in 2001. One of the reasons that Enron was able to get away with the fraud for some rime was because of a low-quality audit by its external audit firm, Arthur Andersen. Prior to the failure of Enron in 2001, Arthur Andersen had been involved in two other major audit failures. These failed audits, related to frauds at Waste Management (1996) and Sunbeam (1997), should have raised red flags for management and any outside observers that some of the audit firm’s internal quality assurance processes were not working. When the federal government uncovered Enron’s fraud along with the string of poor quality audits at Arthur Andersen, the government forced the audit firm out of business. Internal documentation at Arthur Andersen showed that there were conflicts between the auditors and the audit committee of Enron, and that even though there were many individuals concerned about the accounting and disclosure practices at Enron, nothing was done by Andersen to report these problems. In fact, the leading partner on the audit, David Duncan, actively worked to ensure that Enron’s fraudulent financial reporting went uncovered. It appears that Duncan was motivated by the fact that Arthur Andersen was earning enormous consulting fees on the Enron engagement; Enron was a hugely important client for him personally and for the Houston office of Arthur Andersen. Together, these conflicts of interest clouded his independent judgment and professional skepticism. Around the time that Enron declared bankruptcy in late 2001, Arthur Andersen personnel in the Houston office began aggressively destroying documentation relating to the Enron engagement. This action enabled the federal government to file charges against Arthur Andersen that ultimately led to the downfall of the audit firm. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted partially in response to the Enron fraud and the revelation of the poor audit conducted by Arthur Andersen, which is why this case is of particular historical relevance. Considering these facts, answer the following questions: a. Members of Enron management were the individuals who perpetrated the financial statement fraud, this, why do you think the auditors were held responsible when they are not the ones actually making the fraudulent journal entries? b. Explain why the consulting fees and importance of Enron to David Duncan and the Houston office of Arthur Andersen might have affected Duncan’s independence, and thus the quality of the audits he supervised. c. Describe the likely users of Enron’s audited financial statements. How were these various user groups likely affected by the fraud? d. How might the sequential list of frauds perpetrated by Arthur Andersen client (Wage Management, Sunbeam, and finally Enron) have affected the decision by the SEC and federal prosecutors to aggressively seek Arthur Andersen’s legal demise?arrow_forwardSubject: Accounting Information System ETHICS, FRAUD, AND INTERNAL CONTROL Stated Problem: EXPENSE ACCOUNT FRAUD While auditing the financial statements of Petty Cor-poration, the certified public accounting firm of TrueBlue and Smith discovered that its client’s legal expenses account was abnormally high. Further investigation of the records indicated the following:•Since the beginning of the year, several disbursements totaling $15,000 had been made to the law firm of Swindle, Fox, and Kreip.•Swindle, Fox, and Kreip were not Petty Corporation's attorneys. A review of the canceled checks showed that they had been written and approved by Mary Boghas, the cash disbursements clerk. Boghas’s other duties included performing the end-of-month bank reconciliation. Subsequent investigation revealed that Swindle,Fox, and Kreip are representing Mary Boghas in an unrelated embezzlement case in which she is the defendant. The checks had been written in payment of her personal legal fees.…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:Cengage
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And AnalysisAccountingISBN:9781337788281Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald PagachPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage
Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And Analysis
Accounting
ISBN:9781337788281
Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach
Publisher:Cengage Learning