ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
bartleby

Videos

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 6, Problem 36P
To determine

To recommend: the option to be chosen using annual worth comparison.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
A manufacturing company is proposing two new methods to enhance and increase the production line of the company. Method A is expected to cost $1000 while method B is expected to cost $2400. The maintenance cost of the production line will increase to $800 per year if method A is applied and $650 per year with method B, which one of the two proposed methods is more economical based on a future worth analysis at an interest rate of 10% per year? Assume a 15-year life for the production line.
For a new product, the marketing department predicts that sales are expected to be 100,000 units in year 1, increasing by 15,000 each subsequent year to 175,000 in year 6. There are 2 different manufacturing process available: Option A: A manufacturing machine with up-front equipment purchase cost of $150,000 and the manufacturing cost per unit is $0.70. At the end of 6 years, the equipment salvage recovery is $20,000. Option B: A machine with up-front purchase cost of $200,000 with a manufacturing cost of $0.50 per unit, and equipment salvage recovery at the end of 6 years of $40,000. Assume an interest rate of 5% and a production period of 6 years. Which option should you choose based on a present equivalent evaluation with no considerations for depreciation?   1. What is the  present equivalent cost of Option A?   2. What is the  present equivalent cost of Option B?
Please do not give solution in image formate thanku. Biomet Implants is planning new online patient diagnostics for surgeons while they operate. The new system will cost $300,000 to install in an operating room, $5000 annually for maintenance, and have an expected life of 10 years. The revenue per system is estimated to be $80,000 in year 1 and to increase by $10,000 per year through year 10. a)  Determine NPV to see if the project is economically justified using PW analysis and an MARR of 10% per year. b) Insert a Triangle distribution with minimum at $8000, average 10,000 and maximum at 12000 as the input distribution for the revenue increase. Perform Monte Carlo Simulation and discuss the results.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Economics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Text book image
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Difference between Renewable and Nonrenewable Resources; Author: MooMooMath and Science;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLBK1ux5b7U;License: Standard Youtube License