Rochester Manufacturing’s Process Decision
Rochester Manufacturing Corporation (RMC) is considering moving some of its production from traditional numerically controlled machines to a flexible manufacturing system (FMS). Its computer numerical control machines have been operating in a high-variety, low-volume manner. Machine utilization, as near as it can determine, is hovering around 10%. The machine tool salespeople and a consulting firm want to put the machines together in an FMS. They believe that a $3 million expenditure on machinery and the transfer machines will handle about 30% of RMC’s work. There will, of course, be transition and startup costs in addition to this.
The firm has not yet entered all its parts into a comprehensive group technology system, but believes that the 30% is a good estimate of products suitable for the FMS. This 30% should fit very nicely into a “family”. A reduction, because of higher utilization, should take place in the number of pieces of machinery. The firm should be able to go from 15 to about 4 machines, and personnel should go from 15 to perhaps as low as 3. Similarly, floor space reduction will go from 20,000 square feet to about 6,000. Throughput of orders should also improve with processing of this family of parts in 1 to 2 days rather than 7 to 10. Inventory reduction is estimated to yield a one-time $750,000 savings, and annual labor savings should be in the neighborhood of $300,000.
Although the projections all look very positive, an analysis of the project’s return on investment showed it to be between 10% and 15% per year. The company has traditionally had an expectation that projects should yield well over 15% and have payback periods of substantially less than 5 years.
Discussion Questions
1. As a
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 7 Solutions
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT W/MY OM LAB
- California Gardens, Inc., prewashes, shreds, and distributes a variety of salad mixes in 2-pound bags. Doug Voss, Operations VP, is considering a new Hi-Speed shredder to replacethe old machine, referred to in the shop as "Clunker." Hi-Speed will have a fixed cost of $85,000 per month and a variable cost of $1.25 per bag. Clunker has a fixed cost of only $44,000 per month, but a variable cost of$ 1.75. Selling price is $2.50 per bag.a) What is the crossover point in units (point of indifference) for the processes?b) What is the monthly profit or loss if the company changes to the Hi-Speed shredder and sells 60,000 bags per month? c) What is the monthly profit or loss if the company stays with Clunker and sells 60,000 bags per month?arrow_forwardWhat are the advantages when combining process capacities with product specifications?arrow_forwardWhat is CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS FORECASTING?arrow_forward
- Draw a process fl ow diagram of your last doctor’s offi cevisit. Identify bottlenecks. Did any activities occur in parallel?arrow_forwardNAME q, Snake Food Department, and the Bird Food Department. The following Budgeted cosis of on per year Variable costs per tech. Dog Food Dept. Snake Food Depl. Bird Food Deet. Budgeted amounts are used to calculate the allocation robes. Actual usage of technician hours for the year was: Using the dual - rate cost - allocation method, what is the tolal amount of testing labortion, costs that will be budgeted variable costs per bour and budgeted usage. a budgeted fixed costs per hour and budgeted usage.arrow_forwardWhat are the benefits of matching process capabilities to product requirements?arrow_forward
- Two manufacturing processes are being considered for making a new product. Process A is less capital intensive, with fixed costs of $60,000 per year and variable costs of $700 per unit. Process B has fixed costs of $400,000 annually, with variable costs of $300 per unit. What is the break-even quantity for the two processes? If annual sales are expected to be 700 units, which process should be selected? Operations and Engineering have found a way to reduce the cost of Process B, such that the fixed costs for this process decrease from $400,000 to $300,000 annually. All other costs remain the same. Does this change the process selection for the annual sales volume of 700 units?arrow_forwardTwo different manufacturing processes are being considered for maing a new product. The fir proceess is less capital-intensive, with fixed costs of only $50,000 per year and variable costs of $700 per unit. The scond proess has fixed costs of $400,000 but has variable costs of only $200 per unit. If the expected annual sales for theproduct is 800 units, which process would you choose?arrow_forwardRobot Manufacturing Optimization FAY Technologies is deciding whether it should begin production of a new toy robot. It has manufactured children’s toys before but nothing as advanced as its latest robot so historical data is at a minimum. The company believes that they can secure the materials for manufacture for between $65-85 per unit and labor costs would be between $15-25 per unit. Management’s expectations are that materials will cost $70 per unit and labor $25 per unit and that 800 units will be sold monthly. Should FAY decide to manufacture the robots in-house, maintenance of the factory machine would cost $15,000 per month. However, management has found that another alternative is for the company to outsource the labor for a flat rate of $35 per unit. The company expects to sell between 750-1000 units per month initially at a price of $149. Provide recommendations for FAE technologies that will maximize profit. Also include base, worst, and best case…arrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Operations ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781259667473Author:William J StevensonPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationOperations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi...Operations ManagementISBN:9781259666100Author:F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B ChasePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage LearningProduction and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi...Operations ManagementISBN:9781478623069Author:Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon OlsenPublisher:Waveland Press, Inc.