MINDTAP BUSINESS LAW FOR MANN/ROBERTS S
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094498
Author: Roberts
Publisher: IACCENGAGE
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 7, Problem 1TS
Summary Introduction
Case summary:
Individual R, employed as a 'people greeter' and security guard by company W, correctly stopped Person M at the gate, picked up her pack and ordered her to go back inside. Once the security guards ended up looking at the content of Individual M's box, he placed it on the counter to checkout. No company W worker ever told Person M she might not take off until her sack had been reviewed. With capture Person, M was never weakened. Person M put terror on company W.
To discuss: The torts individual M should base their argument on company W.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Jolie, an employee of Tenholder, Inc., was drinking during her lunch break on Tuesday. When she got back to work, her boss, Brian, noticed that she had been drinking and sent her home for the remainder of the day, without pay. Brian instructed Jolie to leave her car at work and take a Taxi home and he would pick her up in the morning on his way back into work. Jolie disobeyed and drove home. On her way home, Jolie caused an accident. Is Tenholder, Inc. liable for the damages resulting from the car accident? Is there an agency relationship exists between Jolie and Tenholder, Inc?
Mark Phipps was employed as a cashier at a Clark gas station. A customer drove into the station and asked him to pump leaded gasoline into her 1976 Chevrolet, an automobile equipped to receive only unleaded gasoline. The station manager told Phipps to comply with the request, but he refused, believing that his dispensing leaded gasoline into the gas tank was a violation of law. Phipps stated that he was willing to pump unleaded gas into the tank, but the manager immediately fired him. Phipps sued Clark for wrongful termination. Clark contended that it was free to terminate Phipps, an employee at will, for any reason or no reason. Decide. Please answer using the IRAC format. Issue: Call of the Question
Rule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the question
Analysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presented
Conclusion: Answer to the Issue
Sanderson drives a delivery truck for Jim’s Wholesale Foods. As Sanderson is on his way to a local delivery, he rear-ends Sarah’s car. Sanderson immediately gets out of the delivery truck to assist Sarah. Sanderson tells Sarah that he did not intend to hit her and that he is very sorry. Sarah’s car is totaled, and Sarah is taken to the hospital with extensive injuries. Once Sarah is discharged from the hospital, she visits an attorney to discuss her options. Sarah’s attorney advises her that she can sue:
a) Jim’s Wholesale Foods only.
b) no one, because the accident was not intentional.
c) both Sanderson and Jim’s Wholesale Foods.
Chapter 7 Solutions
MINDTAP BUSINESS LAW FOR MANN/ROBERTS S
Ch. 7 - Prob. 1COCh. 7 - Prob. 2COCh. 7 - Prob. 3COCh. 7 - Prob. 4COCh. 7 - Prob. 5COCh. 7 - Prob. 1QCh. 7 - Prob. 2QCh. 7 - Prob. 3QCh. 7 - Prob. 4QCh. 7 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 7 - Prob. 6QCh. 7 - Prob. 7QCh. 7 - Prob. 8QCh. 7 - Prob. 9QCh. 7 - Prob. 10QCh. 7 - Prob. 11CPCh. 7 - Prob. 12CPCh. 7 - Prob. 13CPCh. 7 - Prob. 14CPCh. 7 - Prob. 15CPCh. 7 - Prob. 16CPCh. 7 - Prob. 17CPCh. 7 - Prob. 18CPCh. 7 - Prob. 19CPCh. 7 - Prob. 20CPCh. 7 - Prob. 21CPCh. 7 - Prob. 22CPCh. 7 - Prob. 1TSCh. 7 - Prob. 2TSCh. 7 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- At approximately 4:00 A.M. on July 14, 2000, a woman wearing a mask and pointing a firearm demanded that 7-Eleven employees at a store in Berkeley County, West Virginia, give her the store’s money. Antonio Feliciano was working that morning as a sales clerk. While other employees emptied the cash register and the woman was focused on them, Feliciano grabbed and disarmed her. He continued to restrain the would-be robber until local law enforcement authorities arrived on the scene and apprehended her. No one was physically injured in the incident. Nevertheless, shortly thereafter, 7-Eleven terminated Feliciano’s at-will employment. 7-Eleven explained to Feliciano that he was being fired because he violated a company policy that prohibits employees from subduing a robber or otherwise interfering with a store robbery. Feliciano subsequently filed a lawsuit against 7-Eleven alleging that he had been wrongfully discharged in contravention of the West Virginia public policy favoring an…arrow_forwardLAUREEN STATTE WAS A guest at the Vacation Inn Express, a midpriced, limited service hotel in an urban area. When she checked into the hotel, she inquired about the availability of a workout room. Upon receiving assurances that the hotel did indeed have such an area, Ms. Statte checked into the hotel, put away her luggage, changed into workout attire, and proceeded to the workout area. Upon entering the workout room, she noticed a sign prominently posted near the entrance to the workout room stating: “Hotel Not Liable for Any Injuries Incurred During Workouts.” According to her attorney, Ms. Statte lifted deadweights for approximately 10 minutes, and then mounted a treadmill. As an experienced treadmill user, she started slowly, gradually increasing the treadmill’s speed. Shortly after beginning the treadmill workout, Ms. Statte fell backward into a plate-glass window that was approximately 2 feet behind the treadmill. The glass shattered, and shards from the glass severely injured Ms.…arrow_forwardThe Brineys (defendants) owned a large farm on which was located an abandoned farmhouse. For a ten-year period the house had been the subject of several trespassings and housebreakings. In an attempt to stop the intrusions, Briney boarded up the windows and doors and posted “no trespassing” signs. After one break-in, however, Briney set a spring gun in a bedroom. It was placed over the bedroom window so that the gun could not be seen from outside, and no warning of its presence was posted. The gun was set to hit an intruder in the legs. Briney loaded the gun with a live shell, but he claimed that he did not intend to injure anyone. Katko (plaintiff) and a friend, McDonough, had broken into the abandoned farmhouse on an earlier occasion to steal old bottles and fruit jars for their antique collection. They returned for a second time after the spring gun had been set, and Katko was seriously wounded in the leg when the gun discharged as he entered the bedroom. He then brought action for…arrow_forward
- Capune was attempting a trip from New York to Florida on an eighteen-foot-long paddleboard. The trip was being covered by various media to gain publicity for Capune and certain products he endorsed. By water, Capune approached a pier owned by Robbins, who had posted signs prohibiting surfing and swimming around the pier. Capune was unaware of these notices and attempted to continue his journey by passing under the pier. Robbins ran up yelling and threw two bottles at Capune. Capune was frightened and tried to maneuver his paddleboard to go around the pier. Robbins then threw a third bottle that hit Capune in the head. Capune had to be helped out of the water and taken to the hospital. He suffered a physical wound that required twenty-four sutures and, as a result, had to discontinue his trip. Capune brought suit in tort against Robbins. Is Robbins liable? If so, for which tort or torts?arrow_forwardJohn Torniero was employed by Micheals Jewelers, Inc. (Micheals). During the course of his employment, Torniero stole pieces of jewelry, including several diamond rings, a sapphire ring, a gold pendant, and several loose diamonds. Over a period of several months, Torniero sold individual pieces of the stolen jewelry to G&W Watch and Jewelry Corporation (G&W). G&W had no knowledge of how Torniero obtained the jewels. Torniero was arrested when Micheals discovered the thefts. After Torniero admitted that he had sold the stolen jewelry to G&W, Micheals attempted to recover it from G&W. G&W claimed title to the jewelry as a good faith purchaser for value. Micheals challenged G&W’s claim to title in court. Who wins? Explain your reasoning.arrow_forwardJon drank a few beers in Gainesville, Florida, then took his skateboard down to the corner store to pick up some more. On the way back, he swerved into the path of Arya, who was riding a bike, causing a crash in which Arya's arm was broken. A police officer was on the scene, noticed that Jon seemed intoxicated, had him do a field sobriety test, and arrested him for operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol.Find and analyze the following case, State v. Howard, 510 So. 2d 612 (1987), to determine if Jon can be arrested for a DUI while on a skateboard.arrow_forward
- Charles went to Eaton’s in Heritage Mall seeking a refund. However, an argument ensued which caught the attention of the security guard, Fran. Fran took Charles elbow and started to escort him out of the store. Charles protested but did not create a disturbance. Near the door, Charles pushed Fran away, presumably wishing to go through the doors unassisted. Fran reacted quicky and violently putting Charles into a headlock. Charles glasses were knock off and his lip got cut. He was handcuffed and detained in the security office for four hours. Fran took Charles wallet and removed his driver’s license and photograph him without consent. Charles asked Fran that he would leave and asked if he can call his wife. He further asked to call the police. All requests were refused. Please state your reasons on Excessive use of force constituted battery, tort, and vicarious liability; False and unlawful imprisonment; and Trespassarrow_forwardCEO was convinced by his employee, M. Ploy, that a coworker, A. Cused, had been stealing money from the company. At lunch that day in the company cafeteria, CEO discharges Cused from her employment, accuses her of stealing from the company, searches through her purse over her objections, and finally forcibly escorts her to his office to await the arrival of the police, which he has his secretary summon. Cused is indicted for embezzlement but subsequently is acquitted upon establishing her innocence. What rights, if any, does Cused have against CEO?arrow_forwardHarry bought a second-hand laptop from Acer Office Equipment for $900 and spent a further $250 having it overhauled. After using the laptop for some six months, the police arrived at his home one day and asked to examine the laptop. They discovered it had been stolen and seized it from him. It was eventually returned to its true owner. Required: Advise Harry of his rights, if any, under the Australian Consumer Law, against Acer Office Equipment. Do not answer the question using contract law principlesarrow_forward
- David, an 89-year-old war hero with no living relatives, drove himself at night to a local hospital when he experienced shortness of breath and a headache. When he entered the emergency room (ER) he was placed in a wheelchair and briefly seen by an ER doctor. He was told that he could not be admitted because he was a veteran and had to go to a VA hospital, which was 90 minutes away, for treatment. David was wheeled into the hallway to wait for transportation to a VA hospi-tal. The night shift was very busy. After sitting in the hall for five hours, David complained that he needed to lie down. The ER staff, who had been trying to move him to a VA hospital with no luck, finally transferred him by ambulance to a local nursing home. David had a massive stroke shortly after being admitted to the nursing home and died six weeks later. a. Does there appear to be negligence in this case? In your opinion, who might have acted on behalf of David? In your opinion, would contributory negligence be…arrow_forwardOlivo was in the hardware area of a department store. A security guard saw him look around, take a set of wrenches, and conceal it in his clothing. Olivo looked around once more and proceeded toward an exit, passing several cash registers. The guard stopped him short of the exit. a. What argument would support the prosecutor in finding Olivo guilty of larceny? b. What argument would you make as Olivio’s defense counsel for finding him not guilty of larceny? c. Which side’s argument do you find most convincing? Explain.arrow_forwardBrendan Bosse and Michael Griffin were part of a group of four teenagers eating a meal at a Chili’s restaurant in Dedham, Massachusetts. Chili’s is owned by Brinker Restaurant Corporation (collectively “Chili’s”). The cost of the meal was $56. The teenagers decided not to pay. They went out of the building, got in their car, and drove away, heading northward up Route 1. A patron of the restaurant saw the teenagers leave without payment. He followed them in his white sport-utility vehicle (SUV). The teenagers saw him following them. A high-speed chase ensued through Dedham side streets. The patron used his cell phone to call the Chili’s manager. The manager called 911 and reported the incident and the location of the car chase. The teenagers’ car collided with a cement wall, and Bosse and Griffin were seriously injured. The Chili’s patron drove past the crash scene and was never identified. Bosse and Griffin sued Chili’s for compensatory damages for their injuries. The plaintiffs argued…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON