Health Economics
14th Edition
ISBN: 9781137029966
Author: Jay Bhattacharya
Publisher: SPRINGER NATURE CUSTOMER SERVICE
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 7, Problem 2E
To determine
Determine whether the given statement is true or false.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Individuals will prefer to fully insure against a potential adverse event if
A. individuals are risk-loving and insurance is priced at an actuarially fair rate.
B. individuals are risk-averse and insurance is priced at an actuarially fair rate.
C. individuals are risk-loving and insurance is priced above the actuarially fair rate.
D. individuals are risk-averse and insurance is priced above the actuarially fair rate.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.Risk-averse consumers always prefer insurance that is actuarially fair but not full to full insurance that is actuarially unfair – but the opposite is true for risk-loving consumers.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.A consumer with declining marginal utility of income will never prefer actuarially fair, partial insurance to actuarially unfair, full insurance.
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Consider an individual whose utility function over income I is U(I), where U is increasing smoothly in I (U’ > 0) and convex (U” > 0). Draw a utility function in U - I space that fits this description. Explain the connection between U” and risk aversion. True or false: this individual prefers no insurance to an actuarially fair, full contract. Be sure to explain your answer.arrow_forwardThe difference between the actuarily fair price for insurance and the price a risk-averse individual is willing to pay to fully insure is called a-insurance benefit b-risk aversion c-the risk premium d-risk profitarrow_forwardTess and Lex earn $40,000 per year and all earnings are spent on consumption (c). Tess and Lex both have the utility function c. Both could experience an adverse event that results in earnings of $0 per year. Tess has a 1% chance of experiencing an adverse event and Lex has a 12% chance of experiencing an adverse event. Tess and Lex are both aware of their risk of an adverse event. 1. Suppose the actuarially fair premium charge is 2600, Calculate Tess’ expected utility with full insurance if she is charged the premium. Round to two decimal places. 2. What is the premium that private insurance companies will charge for full insurance? Round to two decimal places. 3.Assume the social welfare function is the sum of the Tess’ and Lex’s utility functions. Select the correct statement regarding the explanation for what has happened in the private market and the role of social insurance. a.Adverse section has lead to market failure. The government could improve social welfare by…arrow_forward
- Consider an individual whose utility function over income I is U(I), where U is increasing smoothly in I (U'>0) and convex (U">0).a. Draw a utility function in U–I space that fits this description.b. Explain the connection between U'' and risk aversion.c. True or false: this individual prefers no insurance to (IS, IH) to an actuarially fair, full contract.arrow_forwardIndicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.There are no possible utility functions in which a person is indifferent between actuarially fair, full insurance and actuarially fair, partial insurance.arrow_forwardDraw a graph with utility on the Y axis and income on the X axis for a risk averse person. Label the following points on the Y axis The expected value of utility while uninsured The expected value of utility with actuarially fair, full insurance The expected value of utility with actuarially far, partial insurancearrow_forward
- Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index u(x) = square root x . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explainarrow_forwardSuppose that there is a 20% chance Malik is injured and earns $100,000, and an 80% chance he stays healthy and will earn $500,000. Suppose further that his utility function is the following (utility = square root of income) Malik is risk ____. He will prefer ____ (given the same expected income). a. lover; actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance b. averse; no insurance to actuarially fair and full insurance c. neutral; he will be indifferent between actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurance d. lover; no insurance to actuarially fair and full insurance e. averse; actuarially fair and full insurance to no insurancearrow_forward. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index u(x) √x . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain.arrow_forward
- Q1. Insurance works by spreading risk over - a. the uninsured b. a few people c. several insurance companies d. Many people Q2. Determining the risk associated with a particular group or activity is called - a. discounting b. risk determination c. forecasting d. underwritingarrow_forward. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index u(x) = square root x. There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain. b) What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?arrow_forwardScenario 2 Tess and Lex earn $40,000 per year and all earnings are spent on consumption (c). Tess and Lex both have the utility function (sqrt c) . Both could experience an adverse event that results in earnings of $0 per year. Tess has a 1% chance of experiencing an adverse event and Lex has a 12% chance of experiencing an adverse event. Tess and Lex are both aware of their risk of an adverse event. Refer to Scenario 2 Suppose that insurance companies do not know specific probabilities of adverse events for Tess or Lex, but do know the average probability of an adverse event. If they assumed that both Tess and Lex purchase full insurance, what is the actuarially fair premium charged? Round to two decimal placesarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning