MICROECONOMICS 21E W/CNCT
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781307005851
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG/CREATE
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 7, Problem 4DQ
Subpart (a):
To determine
Economic growth .
Subpart (b):
To determine
Economic growth.
Subpart (c):
To determine
Economic growth.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
True or false with reasoning:
1) _______When we claim that utility can be ordinally measured, we assume that the consumer is able to measure the total and marginal utility received when one extra unit of a commodity is consumed.
2)_______If MRS between two goods is constant, then having more of one good without having more of the other does not increase utility.
3)_______Marginal Utility increases until total utility is at a maximum and then marginal utility decreases.
One type of systematic error arises because people tend to think of benefits in percentage terms rather than in absolute dollar amounts. As an example, Samir is willing to drive 20 minutes out of his way to save $4 on a grocery item that costs $10 at a local market. But he is unwilling to drive 20 minutes out of his way to save $10 on a laptop that costs $400 at a local store. In percentage terms, how big is the savings on the grocery item? On the laptop? In absolute terms, how big is the savings on the grocery item? On the laptop? If Samir is willing to sacrifice 20 minutes of his time to save $4 in one case, shouldn’t he also be willing to sacrifice 20 minutes of his time to save $10?
Consider an economy composed of 16 consumers. Of these, 5 consumers each own one right shoe and 11 consumers each own one left shoe. Shoes are indivisible. Everyone has the same utility function, which is Min(2R, L}, where R and L are, respectively, the quantities of right and left shoes con sumed.
A) (10%) Is the status quo (where each individual has his own shoe) Pareto efficient? If so, briefly explain why. If not, provide a Pareto improvement
b) (10%) Characterize all Pareto efficient allocations
Chapter 7 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS 21E W/CNCT
Ch. 7.1 - Prob. 1QQCh. 7.1 - Prob. 2QQCh. 7.1 - Prob. 3QQCh. 7.1 - Prob. 4QQCh. 7.A - Prob. 1ADQCh. 7.A - Prob. 2ADQCh. 7.A - Prob. 3ADQCh. 7.A - Prob. 1ARQCh. 7.A - Prob. 2ARQCh. 7.A - Prob. 1AP
Ch. 7.A - Prob. 2APCh. 7.A - Prob. 3APCh. 7 - Prob. 1DQCh. 7 - Prob. 2DQCh. 7 - Prob. 3DQCh. 7 - Prob. 4DQCh. 7 - Prob. 5DQCh. 7 - Prob. 6DQCh. 7 - Prob. 7DQCh. 7 - Prob. 8DQCh. 7 - Prob. 9DQCh. 7 - Prob. 10DQCh. 7 - Prob. 1RQCh. 7 - Prob. 2RQCh. 7 - Prob. 3RQCh. 7 - Prob. 4RQCh. 7 - Prob. 5RQCh. 7 - Prob. 1PCh. 7 - Prob. 2PCh. 7 - Prob. 3PCh. 7 - Prob. 4PCh. 7 - Prob. 5PCh. 7 - Prob. 6PCh. 7 - Prob. 7P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that each week Fiona buys 16 peaches and 4 apples at her local farmer's market. Both kinds of fruit cost $1 each. From this we can infer that: If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be greater than her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. Fiona is not maximizing her utility. If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be equal to her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. The law of diminishing marginal utility does not hold for Fiona.arrow_forwardA consumer finds only three products, X, Y, and Z, are for sale. The amount of utility which their consumption will yield is shown in the table below. Assume that the prices of X, Y, and Z are $10, $2, and $8, respectively, and that the consumer has an income of $74 to spend. Product X Product Y Product Z Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ 1 42 NA 1 14 NA 1 32 NA 2 82 4 2 26 6 2 60 3.5 3 118 3.6 3 36 5 3 84 3 4 148 3 4 44 4 4 100 2 5 170 2.2 5 50 3 5 110 1.25 6 182 1.2 6 54 2 6 116 0.75 7 182 _0 7 56.4 _1.2 7 120 _0.5_ Why would the consumer not be maximizing utility by purchasing 2 units of X, 4 units of Y, and 1 unit of Z?arrow_forwardA consumer finds only three products, X, Y, and Z, are for sale. The amount of utility which their consumption will yield is shown in the table below. Assume that the prices of X, Y, and Z are $10, $2, and $8, respectively, and that the consumer has an income of $74 to spend. Product X Product Y Product Z Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ 1 42 NA 1 14 NA 1 32 ___NA__ 2 82 4 2 26 6 2 60 __3.5_ 3 118 3.6 3 36 5 3 84 __3___ 4 148 3 4 44 4 4 100 __2___ 5 170 2.2 5 50 3 5 110 _1.25___ 6 182 1.2 6 54 2 6 116 _0.75__ 7 182 0 7 56.4 1.2 7 120 _0.5_ How many units of X, Y, and Z will the consumer buy when maximizing utility and spending all…arrow_forward
- Suppose that there are only 10 individuals in the economy each with the following utility function over present and future consumption: U (c1, c2) = c1 +C2, where ci is consumption today, and c2 is consumption tomorrow. Consumption tomorrow is less valued because people are impatient and prefer consuming now rather than later. Buying 1 unit of consumption today costs $1 today and buying 1 unit of consumption tomorrow costs $1 tomorrow. All individuals have income of $10 dollars today and no income tomorrow (because they will be retired) but they can save at the market interest rater> 0. How much of his or her income will an individual consume today given that the interest rate is 0.3? O. Less than half of it O. Exactly half of it O. The individual is indifferent between consuming today and saving O. More than half of it O. All of it O. None of it How much of his or her income will an individual consume today given that the interest rate is 0.5? O. Less than half of it…arrow_forwardJohn likes Coca-Cola. After consuming one Coke, John has a total utility of 10 utils. After two Cokes, he has a total utility of 25 utils. After three Cokes, he has a total utility of 50 utils. Does John show diminishing marginal utility for Coke, or does he show increasing marginal utility for Coke? Supposethat John has $3 in his pocket. If Cokes cost $1 each and John is willing to spend one of his dollars on purchasing a first can of Coke, would he spend his second dollar on a Coke, too? What about the third dollar? If John’s marginal utility for Coke keeps on increasing no matter how many Cokes he drinks, would it be fair to say that he is addicted to Coke?arrow_forwardLast Word) Behavioral economics incorporates culture and the studies of Multiple Choice sociology and economics. psychology and economics. mathematics and economics. finance and economics. None of these choices are correct.arrow_forward
- An individual is faced with a choice of buying housing in one of two markets; the private market where he may buy any amount of housing he pleases at the going price, and the public housing market where he will be offered, on a take-it-or-leave-it-basis, a particular amount of housing at a price lower than that which he would pay for it on the private market. Will he necessarily choose the public housing? If so, may we conclude that he will consume more housing than he would have purchased had he been forced to buy it on the private market? (With thanks to Dr Leslie Rosenthal.)arrow_forward3. Suppose that Omar’s marginal utility for cups of coffee is constant at 1.5 utils per cup, no matter how many cups he drinks. On the other hand, his marginal utility per doughnut is 10 for the first doughnut he eats, 9 for the second he eats, 8 for the third he eats, and so on (that is, declining by 1 util per additional doughnut). In addition, suppose that coffee costs $1 per cup, doughnuts cost $1 each, and Omar has a budget that he can spend only on doughnuts, coffee, or both. How big would that budget have to be before he would spend a dollar buying a first cup of coffee? *use tables and/or graphs if possible, please original workarrow_forwardSuppose that there are three beachfront parcels of land available for sale in Astoria, and six people who would each like to purchase one parcel. Assume that the parcels are essentially identical and that the selling price of each is $745,000. The following table states each person's willingness and ability to purchase a parcel. Willingness and Ability to Purchase (Dollars) Alyssa 720,000 Brian 690,000 Crystal 680,000 Nick 900,000 Rosa 810,000 Tim 770,000 Which of these people will buy one of the three beachfront parcels? Check all that apply. Alyssa Brian Crystal Nick Rosa Tim Assume that the three beachfront parcels are sold to the people you indicated in the previous section. Suppose that a few days after the last of those beachfront parcels is sold, another essentially identical beachfront parcel becomes available for sale at a price of $732,500. This fourth parcel _____________be sold…arrow_forward
- 1. Suppose that on the island, the currency is shell beads. The going price for coconuts is 2.4 beads and that for fish is 1 bead. You earn 20 beads per period from your job as a harvester. Given the data in the table, your equilibrium or maximum satisfaction coconut-fish combination will be ____? coconuts and ____? fish. Explain why this will be the chosen combination. 2. Your total utility from the coconut-fish combination is ____?arrow_forwardSuppose that Omar’s marginal utility for cups of coffee is constant at 1.5 utils per cup no matter how many cups he drinks. On the other hand, his marginal utility per doughnut is 10 for the first doughnut he eats, 9 for the second he eats, 8 for the third he eats, and so on (that is, declining by 1 util per additional doughnut). In addition, suppose that coffee costs $1 per cup, doughnuts cost $1 each, and Omar has a budget that he can spend only on doughnuts, coffee, or both. How big would that budget have to be before he would spend a dollar buying a first cup of coffee?arrow_forwardReese thinks peanut butter and chocolate are great when separate, but when they combine they are even more epic. In other words, Reese likes to eat either peanut butter or chocolate, but when he eats them together, he gets additional satisfaction from the combination. His preference over peanut butter (x) and chocolate (y) is represented by the utility function: u(x, y) = xy + x + y Suppose that now Reese loses almost his entire income, so that he is left with only one dollar, i.e. his new income is I0 = 1. If prices are still px = 2, py = 4, what is his new optimal consumption of x and y (Hint: Remember that consumption of both goods must be weakly positive, i.e. x∗ ≥ 0 and y∗ ≥ 0) (a) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 0(b) x∗ = 0.25, y∗ = 0(c) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0.25(d) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0(e) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 1arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
