MICROECONOMICS 21E W/CNCT
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781307005851
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG/CREATE
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 7.A, Problem 2AP
To determine
The indifference curve and total utility.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose that each week Fiona buys 16 peaches and 4 apples at her local farmer's market. Both kinds of fruit cost $1 each. From this we can infer that:
If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be greater than her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys.
Fiona is not maximizing her utility.
If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be equal to her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys.
The law of diminishing marginal utility does not hold for Fiona.
True or false with reasoning:
1) _______When we claim that utility can be ordinally measured, we assume that the consumer is able to measure the total and marginal utility received when one extra unit of a commodity is consumed.
2)_______If MRS between two goods is constant, then having more of one good without having more of the other does not increase utility.
3)_______Marginal Utility increases until total utility is at a maximum and then marginal utility decreases.
1.Suppose that Chris's utility function is given by UC=QC1/2 RC1/2 , where QC and RC are his consumption of Q and R, respectively. Dana's utility function is given by UD=QD1/3 RD2/3, where QD and RD are her consumption of Q and R, respectively.
Write an equation for the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) between Q and R for each of the two agents.
2.Suppose that the price of good R is pR=1 and the price of good Q is pQ=2.
How much is Chris's and Dana's initial income, given his endowments and given these prices?
3.
At these prices, how many units of Q would Chris and Dana want to consume?
4.
At these prices, how many units of R would Chris and Dana want to consume?
Chapter 7 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS 21E W/CNCT
Ch. 7.1 - Prob. 1QQCh. 7.1 - Prob. 2QQCh. 7.1 - Prob. 3QQCh. 7.1 - Prob. 4QQCh. 7.A - Prob. 1ADQCh. 7.A - Prob. 2ADQCh. 7.A - Prob. 3ADQCh. 7.A - Prob. 1ARQCh. 7.A - Prob. 2ARQCh. 7.A - Prob. 1AP
Ch. 7.A - Prob. 2APCh. 7.A - Prob. 3APCh. 7 - Prob. 1DQCh. 7 - Prob. 2DQCh. 7 - Prob. 3DQCh. 7 - Prob. 4DQCh. 7 - Prob. 5DQCh. 7 - Prob. 6DQCh. 7 - Prob. 7DQCh. 7 - Prob. 8DQCh. 7 - Prob. 9DQCh. 7 - Prob. 10DQCh. 7 - Prob. 1RQCh. 7 - Prob. 2RQCh. 7 - Prob. 3RQCh. 7 - Prob. 4RQCh. 7 - Prob. 5RQCh. 7 - Prob. 1PCh. 7 - Prob. 2PCh. 7 - Prob. 3PCh. 7 - Prob. 4PCh. 7 - Prob. 5PCh. 7 - Prob. 6PCh. 7 - Prob. 7P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Refer to Table 11W.1 and suppose the price of new product C is $2 instead of $4. How does this affect the optimal combination of products A, B, and C for the person represented by the data? Explain: “The success of a new product depends not only on its marginal utility but also on its price.”arrow_forwardA consumer finds only three products, X, Y, and Z, are for sale. The amount of utility which their consumption will yield is shown in the table below. Assume that the prices of X, Y, and Z are $10, $2, and $8, respectively, and that the consumer has an income of $74 to spend. Product X Product Y Product Z Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ 1 42 NA 1 14 NA 1 32 NA 2 82 4 2 26 6 2 60 3.5 3 118 3.6 3 36 5 3 84 3 4 148 3 4 44 4 4 100 2 5 170 2.2 5 50 3 5 110 1.25 6 182 1.2 6 54 2 6 116 0.75 7 182 _0 7 56.4 _1.2 7 120 _0.5_ Why would the consumer not be maximizing utility by purchasing 2 units of X, 4 units of Y, and 1 unit of Z?arrow_forwardA consumer finds only three products, X, Y, and Z, are for sale. The amount of utility which their consumption will yield is shown in the table below. Assume that the prices of X, Y, and Z are $10, $2, and $8, respectively, and that the consumer has an income of $74 to spend. Product X Product Y Product Z Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ Quantity Utility Marginal Utility per $ 1 42 NA 1 14 NA 1 32 ___NA__ 2 82 4 2 26 6 2 60 __3.5_ 3 118 3.6 3 36 5 3 84 __3___ 4 148 3 4 44 4 4 100 __2___ 5 170 2.2 5 50 3 5 110 _1.25___ 6 182 1.2 6 54 2 6 116 _0.75__ 7 182 0 7 56.4 1.2 7 120 _0.5_ How many units of X, Y, and Z will the consumer buy when maximizing utility and spending all…arrow_forward
- Suppose that Omar’s marginal utility for cups of coffee is constant at 1.5 utils per cup no matter how many cups he drinks. On the other hand, his marginal utility per doughnut is 10 for the first doughnut he eats, 9 for the second he eats, 8 for the third he eats, and so on (that is, declining by 1 util per additional doughnut). In addition, suppose that coffee costs $1 per cup, doughnuts cost $1 each, and Omar has a budget that he can spend only on doughnuts, coffee, or both. How big would that budget have to be before he would spend a dollar buying a first cup of coffee?arrow_forwardSuppose that Alex's marginal rate of substitution (MRS) between good A and B is always equal to -2. The prices of the goods are $5 and $4 respectively. Alex's income is $20. Thus, his optimal consumption bundle must be (x*1,x*2) = (4,0), i.e., his demand for good A and good B is x*1 = 4 and x*2 = 0, respectively. Is this true or false? If true, show the steps in full to justify and if it is false, show the correct demand and expalin in details.arrow_forwardNo written by hand solution Assume Fred has the following preference relation on [0, 1]: x ≿ y if and only if x ≤ y for all x ̸= 1 and y ̸= 1; and 1 ≻ z for all z ∈ (0, 1), 1 ∼ 1 and 0 ≻ 1. Does there exists a utility representation for this preference relation? If yes, provide a utility function. If no, explain. Show your work.arrow_forward
- Suppose Coke and Pepsi are perfect substitutes for me, and right and left shoes are perfect complements. A. Suppose my income allocated to Coke/Pepsi consumption is $100 per month, and my income allocated to right/left shoe consumption is similarly $100 per month. a. Suppose Coke currently costs $0.50 per can and Pepsi costs $0.75 per can. Then the price of Coke goes up to $1 per can. Illustrate my original and my new optimal bundle with "Coke" on the horizontal and "Pepsi" on the vertical axis. b. Suppose right and left shoes are sold separately. If right and left shoes are originally both priced at $1, illustrate (on a graph with "right shoes" on the horizontal and "left shoes" on the vertical) my original and my new optimal bundle when the price of left shoes increases to $2. c. True or False: Perfect complements represent a unique special case of homothetic tastes in the following sense: Whether income goes up or whether the price of one of the goods falls, the optimal bundle…arrow_forwardFor each of the following, graphically decompose the total effect of the price change into the substitution and income effects on a well-annotated graph. Be sure to clearly label each of the three effects. 2. Paula’s preferences for goods x and y are given by the utility function, U = x 1/2 y 1/2 . Her income is $160, and the price of good y is always $20. Suppose the price of x starts at $20 and then decreases to $5. a. Calculate the income, substitution, and total effects of the price decrease on both goods. Show your work for full credit and round to 2 decimal places where appropriate. b. Use a clearly labeled graph to illustrate the total, income, and substitution effects of the price decrease on Paula’s consumption of goods x and y.arrow_forward22. Peanut butter (PB) sells for 10 dollars per pound and Oysters (O) sell for 50 dollars perpound. Suppose Pat buys 5 pounds of peanut butter and one pound of oysters each month.With this consumption bundle, his MRSP B,O = 3. Which of the following is true (assumingPat’s preferences satisfy all the basic assumptions of consumer theory)?(a) Pat could increase his utility by buying more oysters and less peanut butter.(b) Pat could increase his utility by buying more peanut butter and less oysters.(c) Pat could increase his utility by buying more peanut butter and more oysters.(d) Pat could increase his utility by buying less peanut butter and less oysters.arrow_forward
- You are choosing between two goods, X and Y, and your marginal utility from each is shown in the following table. Units of X MUx Units of Y MUy 1 10 1 8 2 8 2 7 3 6 3 6 4 4 4 5 5 3 5 4 6 2 6 3 a. If your income is $9 and the prices of X and Y are $2 and $1, respectively, what quantities of each will you purchase to maximize utility? ______units of X and ______units of Y b. What total utility will you realize? ______utils c. Assume that, other things remaining unchanged, the price of X falls to $1. What quantities of X and Y will you now purchase? _____units of X and ______units of Y d. Using the two prices and quantities for X, complete the table to derive the demand schedule (a table showing prices and quantities demanded) for X. Instructions: Start with the highest price first Price of X Quantity Demanded of X $ $arrow_forward- Create a consumer model that shows how economists explain the consumer choice between two products (X & Y) that maximize the consumer’s utility. Do not use numbers. Just graphs and detailed explanations. Show why the equilibrium point (tangency) shows the best bundle of X & Y and that any other point will not reflect a bundle that maximizes consumers' utility. Explain the income and substitution effect. Derive the demand function from the consumer theory. Do not use numbers. Just graphs and detailed explanationsarrow_forward1 explain With the aid of two well labelled diagram(s) with before and after transitions whether the statement below is True, False or Cannot be determined, given the information provided: Two commodities, P and Q are perfect substitutes with per unit prices of $PP and $PQ respectively. The income of an individual is given by $I. It is also given that initially, $PP = $PQ. Then it can be reasonably claimed that in a specific situation where $I remains unchanged and due to some exogenous factor, $PP < $PQ, then the budget line, which initially was overlapping an indifference curve will pivot, become flatter and resultantly, the optimal bundle will be always be a corner solution at (0,Q*) and no other possibility would exist.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning