Concept explainers
a.
Draw the flow of the different models through the production process.
a.
Explanation of Solution
Production cost:
Production cost refers to the cost associated with the production process. Direct costs associated with the process and stages of completion are taken into consideration while computing the cost of the production of any product.
Description of the diagram:
The four products go through the process as drawn above. All the four products go through assembly line. Only the products commuter and sport go for polishing before going through packaging. Product retirement goes through special finishing process and not polishing. The only product that has been packaged straight away from assembly line is Gag-Gift. All the products are then converted into finished goods.
The cost will be different for every product as well. Gag-Gift will include assembly and packaging. Commuter and sport will include assembly, polishing and packaging. Retirement includes cost of assembly, special finishing and packaging.
b.
Determine the cost per unit transferred to finished goods inventory for each of the four watches.
b.
Explanation of Solution
Cost per unit:
Total amount accounted for and total units accounted are considered computation of cost per equivalent unit.
Compute the cost per unit transferred to finished goods inventory for each of the four watches:
Particulars | Total | Gag-Gift | Commuter | Sport | Retirement |
Materials | $ 321,000 | $ 15,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 156,000 | $ 60,000 |
Conversion costs: | |||||
Assembly | $ 120,000 | $ 20,000(1) | $ 40,000(2) | $ 52,000(3) | $ 8,000(4) |
Polishing | $ 69,000 | $ 0 | $ 30,000(5) | $ 39,000(6) | $ 0 |
Special finishing | $ 20,000 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 20,000(7) |
Packaging | $ 90,000 | $ 15,000(8) | $ 30,000(9) | $ 39,000(10) | $ 6,000(11) |
Total conversion costs | $ 299,000 | $ 35,000 | $ 100,000 | $ 130,000 | $ 34,000 |
Total product cost | $ 620,000 | $ 50,000 | $ 190,000 | $ 286,000 | $ 94,000 |
Number of units | 5,000 | 10,000 | 13,000 | 2,000 | |
Cost per unit | $ 10.00(12) | $ 19.00(13) | $ 22.00(14) | $ 47.00(15) |
Working note 1:
Compute the conversion costs of assembly for Gag-gift:
Working note 2:
Compute the conversion costs of assembly for Commuter:
Working note 3:
Compute the conversion costs of assembly for Sport:
Working note 4:
Compute the conversion costs of assembly for Retirement:
Working note 5:
Compute the conversion costs of polishing for Commuter:
Working note 6:
Compute the conversion costs of polishing for Sport:
Working note 7:
Compute the conversion costs of special packaging for Retirement:
Working note 8:
Compute the conversion costs of packaging for Gag-gift:
Working note 9:
Compute the conversion costs of packaging for Commuter:
Working note 10:
Compute the conversion costs of packaging for Sport:
Working note 11:
Compute the conversion costs of packaging for Retirement:
Working note 12:
Compute the cost per unit transferred to finished goods for Gag-gift:
Working note 13:
Compute the cost per unit transferred to finished goods for Commuter:
Working note 14:
Compute the cost per unit transferred to finished goods for Gag-gift:
Working note 15:
Compute the cost per unit transferred to finished goods for Gag-gift:
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
FUNDAMENTAL'S OF COST ACCOUNTING LL
- Help me plzzarrow_forwardGodoarrow_forwardDevereaux Cycles makes three models of scooter: Commuter, Sport, and X-treme. The scooters are produced in four departments: Assembly, Detailing, Customization, and Packaging. All three models are started in Assembly, where all materials are assembled. The Commuter is then sent to Packaging, where it is packaged and transferred to finished goods inventory. The Sport is then transferred to Detailing. Once the detailing process is completed, the Sport models are transferred to Packaging and then finished goods. The X- Treme model is assembled and then transferred to Customization, and then Packaging. When packaged, it is transferred to finished goods. Data for February are shown in the following table. Conversion costs are allocated based on the number of units processed in each department. No work-in-process inventories are maintained in any department. Materials Conversion costs: Assembly Detailing Customization Packaging Total conversion costs Commuter Sport X-Treme Total $ 3,694,000…arrow_forward
- Vishnuarrow_forwardDo not give answer in imagearrow_forwardDiamond Inc. manufactures jewelry. The company has two departments, Assembly and Polishing. For the Polishing Department, material is added when the process is 80% complete. Work happens evenly throughout the process, so Conversion Costs are added evenly to the product. Once assembly is complete, the jewelry pieces are immediately transferred to the Polishing Department. Once the polishing is complete, the final product is transferred to Finished Goods Inventory. Data for the Polishing Department is as follows: Equiv Units Ending Equiv Units Open WIP New Costs Transferred-In 200 60 $250 $15,050 Direct Materials 140 - $500 $1,500 Conversion Costs 182 42 $1,250 $4,000 Actual units Ending Inventory 60 Units Transferred out 140 Provide calculations in good form for the costs per equivalent units and the total cost reconciliation for the department. If Diamond…arrow_forward
- Rich company produces a variety of stationery products. One product, sealing wax sticks,passes through two processes: blending and molding. The weighted average method is used toaccount for the cost of production. Two ingredients, paraffin and pigment are added at thebeginning of the process and heated and mixed for several hours. After blending, the resultingproduct is sent to the Molding department, where it is poured into molds and cooled. Thefollowing information relates to the blending process for November:a) Work in process, November 1, had 20,000 pounds, 20% complete with respect toconversion costs. Costs associated with partially completed units withParaffin $ 120,000Pigment $ 100,000Direct Labor $ 30,000Overhead applied $ 10,000b) Work in process, August 31, had 30,000 pounds, 70% complete with respect toconversion costs.c) Units completed and transferred out totaled 500,000 pounds. Costs added during themonth were:Paraffin $ 3,060,000Pigment $ 2,550,000Direct Labor $…arrow_forwardHealthway uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the minerals that it produces. It has three departments: Mixing, Tableting, and Bottling. In Mixing, at the beginning of the process all materials are added and the ingredients for the minerals are measured, sifted, and blended together. The mix is transferred out in gallon containers. The Tableting Department takes the powdered mix and places it in capsules. One gallon of powdered mix converts to 1,600 capsules. After the capsules are filled and polished, they are transferred to Bottling where they are placed in bottles, which are then affixed with a safety seal and a lid and labeled. Each bottle receives 50 capsules. During July, the following results are available for the first two departments (direct materials are added at the beginning in both departments): Overhead in both departments is applied as a percentage of direct labor costs. In the Mixing Department, overhead is 200 percent of direct labor. In the Tableting Department, the overhead rate is 150 percent of direct labor. Required: 1. Prepare a production report for the Mixing Department using the weighted average method. Follow the five steps outlined in the chapter. Round unit cost to three decimal places. 2. Prepare a production report for the Tableting Department. Materials are added at the beginning of the process. Follow the five steps outlined in the chapter. Round unit cost to four decimal places.arrow_forwardGolding Manufacturing, a division of Farnsworth Sporting, Inc., produces two different models of bows and eight models of knives. The bow-manufacturing process involves the production of two major subassemblies: the limbs and the handle. The limbs pass through four sequential processes before reaching final assembly: lay-up, molding, fabricating, and finishing. In the Lay-Up Department, limbs are created by laminating layers of wood. In Molding, the limbs are heat treated, under pressure, to form a strong resilient limb. In the Fabricating Department, any protruding glue or other processing residue is removed. Finally, in Finishing, the limbs are cleaned with acetone, dried, and sprayed with the final finishes. The handles pass through two processes before reaching final assembly: pattern and finishing. In the Pattern Department, blocks of wood are fed into a machine that is set to shape the handles. Different patterns are possible, depending on the machines setting. After coming out of the machine, the handles are cleaned and smoothed. They then pass to the Finishing Department where they are sprayed with the final finishes. In Final Assembly, the limbs and handles are assembled into different models using purchased parts such as pulley assemblies, weight adjustment bolts, side plates, and string. Golding, since its inception, has been using process costing to assign product costs. A predetermined overhead rate is used based on direct labor dollars (80 percent of direct labor dollars). Recently, Golding has hired a new controller, Karen Jenkins. After reviewing the product costing procedures, Karen requested a meeting with the divisional manager, Aaron Suhr. The following is a transcript of their conversation: KAREN: Aaron, I have some concerns about our cost accounting system. We make two different models of bows and are treating them as if they were the same product. Now I know that the only real difference between the models is the handle. The processing of the handles is the same, but the handles differ significantly in the amount and quality of wood used. Our current costing does not reflect this difference in direct material input. AARON: Your predecessor is responsible. He believed that tracking the difference in direct material cost wasnt worth the effort. He simply didnt believe that it would make much difference in the unit cost of either model. KAREN: Well, he may have been right, but I have my doubts. If there is a significant difference, it could affect our views of which model is more important to the company. The additional bookkeeping isnt very stringent. All we have to worry about is the Pattern Department. The other departments fit what I view as a process-costing pattern. AARON: Why dont you look into it? If there is a significant difference, go ahead and adjust the costing system. After the meeting, Karen decided to collect cost data on the two models: the Deluxe model and the Econo model. She decided to track the costs for one week. At the end of the week, she had collected the following data from the Pattern Department: a. There were a total of 2,500 bows completed: 1,000 Deluxe models and 1,500 Econo models. b. There was no beginning work in process; however, there were 300 units in ending work in process: 200 Deluxe and 100 Econo models. Both models were 80 percent complete with respect to conversion costs and 100 percent complete with respect to direct materials. c. The Pattern Department experienced the following costs: d. On an experimental basis, the requisition forms for direct materials were modified to identify the dollar value of the direct materials used by the Econo and Deluxe models: Required: 1. Compute the unit cost for the handles produced by the Pattern Department, assuming that process costing is totally appropriate. 2. Compute the unit cost of each handle, using the separate cost information provided on materials. 3. Compare the unit costs computed in Requirements 1 and 2. Is Karen justified in her belief that a pure process-costing relationship is not appropriate? Describe the costing system that you would recommend. 4. In the past, the marketing manager has requested more money for advertising the Econo line. Aaron has repeatedly refused to grant any increase in this products advertising budget because its per-unit profit (selling price less manufacturing cost) is so low. Given the results in Requirements 1 through 3, was Aaron justified in his position?arrow_forward
- Golding Manufacturing, a division of Farnsworth Sporting Inc., produces two different models of bows and eight models of knives. The bow-manufacturing process involves the production of two major subassemblies: the limbs and the handles. The limbs pass through four sequential processes before reaching final assembly: layup, molding, fabricating, and finishing. In the layup department, limbs are created by laminating layers of wood. In the molding department, the limbs are heat-treated, under pressure, to form strong resilient limbs. In the fabricating department, any protruding glue or other processing residue is removed. Finally, in the finishing department, the limbs are cleaned with acetone, dried, and sprayed with the final finishes. The handles pass through two processes before reaching final assembly: pattern and finishing. In the pattern department, blocks of wood are fed into a machine that is set to shape the handles. Different patterns are possible, depending on the machines setting. After coming out of the machine, the handles are cleaned and smoothed. They then pass to the finishing department, where they are sprayed with the final finishes. In final assembly, the limbs and handles are assembled into different models using purchased parts such as pulley assemblies, weight-adjustment bolts, side plates, and string. Golding, since its inception, has been using process costing to assign product costs. A predetermined overhead rate is used based on direct labor dollars (80% of direct labor dollars). Recently, Golding has hired a new controller, Karen Jenkins. After reviewing the product-costing procedures, Karen requested a meeting with the divisional manager, Aaron Suhr. The following is a transcript of their conversation: Karen: Aaron, I have some concerns about our cost accounting system. We make two different models of bows and are treating them as if they were the same product. Now I know that the only real difference between the models is the handle. The processing of the handles is the same, but the handles differ significantly in the amount and quality of wood used. Our current costing does not reflect this difference in material input. Aaron: Your predecessor is responsible. He believed that tracking the difference in material cost wasnt worth the effort. He simply didnt believe that it would make much difference in the unit cost of either model. Karen: Well, he may have been right, but I have my doubts. If there is a significant difference, it could affect our views of which model is more important to the company. The additional bookkeeping isnt very stringent. All we have to worry about is the pattern department. The other departments fit what I view as a process-costing pattern. Aaron: Why dont you look into it? If there is a significant difference, go ahead and adjust the costing system. After the meeting, Karen decided to collect cost data on the two models: the Deluxe model and the Econo model. She decided to track the costs for one week. At the end of the week, she had collected the following data from the pattern department: a. There were a total of 2,500 bows completed: 1,000 Deluxe models and 1,500 Econo models. b. There was no BWIP; however, there were 300 units in EWIP: 200 Deluxe and 100 Econo models. Both models were 80% complete with respect to conversion costs and 100% complete with respect to materials. c. The pattern department experienced the following costs: d. On an experimental basis, the requisition forms for materials were modified to identify the dollar value of the materials used by the Econo and Deluxe models: Required: 1. Compute the unit cost for the handles produced by the pattern department, assuming that process costing is totally appropriate. Round unit cost to two decimal places. 2. Compute the unit cost of each handle, using the separate cost information provided on materials. Round unit cost to two decimal places. 3. Compare the unit costs computed in Requirements 1 and 2. Is Karen justified in her belief that a pure process-costing relationship is not appropriate? Describe the costing system that you would recommend. 4. In the past, the marketing manager has requested more money for advertising the Econo line. Aaron has repeatedly refused to grant any increase in this products advertising budget because its per-unit profit (selling price minus manufacturing cost) is so low. Given the results in Requirements 1 through 3, was Aaron justified in his position?arrow_forwardBenson Pharmaceuticals uses a process-costing system to compute the unit costs of the over-the-counter cold remedies that it produces. It has three departments: mixing, encapsulating, and bottling. In mixing, the ingredients for the cold capsules are measured, sifted, and blended (with materials assumed to be uniformly added throughout the process). The mix is transferred out in gallon containers. The encapsulating department takes the powdered mix and places it in capsules (which are necessarily added at the beginning of the process). One gallon of powdered mix converts into 1,500 capsules. After the capsules are filled and polished, they are transferred to bottling, where they are placed in bottles that are then affixed with a safety seal, lid, and label. Each bottle receives 50 capsules. During March, the following results are available for the first two departments: Overhead in both departments is applied as a percentage of direct labor costs. In the mixing department, overhead is 200% of direct labor. In the encapsulating department, the overhead rate is 150% of direct labor. Required: 1. Prepare a production report for the mixing department using the weighted average method. Follow the five steps outlined in the chapter. (Note: Round to two decimal places for the unit cost.) 2. Prepare a production report for the encapsulating department using the weighted average method. Follow the five steps outlined in the chapter. (Note: Round to four decimal places for the unit cost.) 3. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Explain why the weighted average method is easier to use than FIFO. Explain when weighted average will give about the same results as FIFO.arrow_forwardChristie's Co. manufactures cookies. The company has two departments, Mixing and Baking. For the Baking Department, material is added at the beginning of the process. Work happens evenly throughout the process, so Conversion Costs are added evenly to the product. Once mixing is complete, the cookies pieces are immediately transferred to the Baking Department. Once the baking is complete, the final product is transferred to Finished Goods Inventory. Data for the Baking Department is as follows: Units Transfer $ DirectMaterials $ % Complete Conv Costs % Complete Opening WIP 550 $3,500 $2,800 100% $2,100 30% New units & Costs 2,000 $12,300 $8,100 $14,000 Ending WIP 680 ??? 65% Calculate the physical and equivalent units for Transferred-In, Direct Materials and Conversion Costsarrow_forward
- Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning