MICROECONOMICS CONNECT ACCESS CARD
null Edition
ISBN: 9781260923513
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 4P
To determine
Efficiency of choice.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
An individual is faced with a choice of buying housing in one of two markets; the private market where he may buy any amount of housing he pleases at the going price, and the public housing market where he will be offered, on a take-it-or-leave-it-basis, a particular amount of housing at a price lower than that which he would pay for it on the private market. Will he necessarily choose the public housing? If so, may we conclude that he will consume more housing than he would have purchased had he been forced to buy it on the private market? (With thanks to Dr Leslie Rosenthal.)
Bart and Lisa are both optimizing consumers in the market for shirts and hats, where they pay $100 for a shirt and $50 for a hat. Bart buys 8 shirts and 4 hats, while Lisa buys 6 shirts and 12 hats. From this information, ignoring the minus sign, we can infer that Bart's marginal rate of substiution is _________ hats per shirt, while Lisa's is __________ hat's per shirt
One type of systematic error arises because people tend to think of benefits in percentage terms rather than in absolute dollar amounts. As an example, Samir is willing to drive 20 minutes out of his way to save $4 on a grocery item that costs $10 at a local market. But he is unwilling to drive 20 minutes out of his way to save $10 on a laptop that costs $400 at a local store. In percentage terms, how big is the savings on the grocery item? On the laptop? In absolute terms, how big is the savings on the grocery item? On the laptop? If Samir is willing to sacrifice 20 minutes of his time to save $4 in one case, shouldn’t he also be willing to sacrifice 20 minutes of his time to save $10?
Chapter 8 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS CONNECT ACCESS CARD
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose that there are only 10 individuals in the economy each with the following utility function over present and future consumption: U (c1, c2) = c1 +C2, where ci is consumption today, and c2 is consumption tomorrow. Consumption tomorrow is less valued because people are impatient and prefer consuming now rather than later. Buying 1 unit of consumption today costs $1 today and buying 1 unit of consumption tomorrow costs $1 tomorrow. All individuals have income of $10 dollars today and no income tomorrow (because they will be retired) but they can save at the market interest rater> 0. How much of his or her income will an individual consume today given that the interest rate is 0.3? O. Less than half of it O. Exactly half of it O. The individual is indifferent between consuming today and saving O. More than half of it O. All of it O. None of it How much of his or her income will an individual consume today given that the interest rate is 0.5? O. Less than half of it…arrow_forwardMegan is a college student who consumes food and transportation. Last year, she consumed 90 meals and purchased 100 gallons of gasoline per month. Suppose that last year the price of a meal was $5 and the price of a gallon of gasoline was $2.23. However, this year, the price of a meal is $6 and the price of a gallon of gasoline is $3.92. As a result, Megan consumes 100 meals and 80 gallons of gasoline. For this example, assume Megan's utility this year is the same as her utility last year (and that her preferences have not changed). Calculate a Laspeyres cost-of-living index for Megan using 100 as the base for last year. In particular, the Laspeyres index for this year is nothing. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)arrow_forwardSuppose that Verania and Josimar are roommates that need to complete some household chores. Vacuuming and washing dishes need to be done. They know from the last time they did these chores that it takes Verania 2 hours to vacuum and 1 hour to wash dishes. It takes Josimar 3 hours to vacuum and 2 hours to wash dishes. Josimar says it does not matter which task each of them performs because Verania is faster at both tasks. Josimar’s reasoning a. is wrong. Because Verania has a comparative advantage in washing dishes, she should wash dishes, and Josimar should vacuum. b. is correct. Because Verania is faster at both tasks, there is no benefit in each volunteer specializing in one task or the other. c. is wrong. Because Verania has an absolute advantage in both tasks, she should perform both tasks herself. d. is wrong. Because Josimar has a comparative advantage in washing dishes, he should wash dishes, and Verania should vacuum.arrow_forward
- Suppose that each week Fiona buys 16 peaches and 4 apples at her local farmer's market. Both kinds of fruit cost $1 each. From this we can infer that: If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be greater than her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. Fiona is not maximizing her utility. If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be equal to her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. The law of diminishing marginal utility does not hold for Fiona.arrow_forwardIn a simple exchange economy, Alex and Sid both have identical lexicographic preferences with a preference for maple syrup. This means that when comparing any two bundles, each of them would prefer the one with the larger amount of maple syrup regardless of the amount of poutine in those bundles. If the two bundles have identical amounts of maple syrup, then they would choose the one with a larger amount of poutine. The total amount of maple syrup in this economy is 15, and there are 21 plates of poutine. Describe the contract curve in this economy and justify your answer.arrow_forwardSuppose that there are three beachfront parcels of land available for sale in Astoria, and six people who would each like to purchase one parcel. Assume that the parcels are essentially identical and that the selling price of each is $745,000. The following table states each person's willingness and ability to purchase a parcel. Willingness and Ability to Purchase (Dollars) Alyssa 720,000 Brian 690,000 Crystal 680,000 Nick 900,000 Rosa 810,000 Tim 770,000 Which of these people will buy one of the three beachfront parcels? Check all that apply. Alyssa Brian Crystal Nick Rosa Tim Assume that the three beachfront parcels are sold to the people you indicated in the previous section. Suppose that a few days after the last of those beachfront parcels is sold, another essentially identical beachfront parcel becomes available for sale at a price of $732,500. This fourth parcel _____________be sold…arrow_forward
- Refer to Table 11W.1 and suppose the price of new product C is $2 instead of $4. How does this affect the optimal combination of products A, B, and C for the person represented by the data? Explain: “The success of a new product depends not only on its marginal utility but also on its price.”arrow_forwardLet’s use the Fisher effect to use two known values to learn about the unknown third one. Consider the table, with some values given and some missing. ?i ??Eπ ?EquilibriumrEquilibrium 5% 2% 3% 5% 1% ___ 5% ___ 8% ___ 10% 2% 6% ___ 2% 0% -2% ___ Compute the missing values in the table. ?=5%,??=1%,?Equilibrium=i=5%,Eπ=1%,rEquilibrium= % ?=5%,?Equilibrium=8%,??=i=5%,rEquilibrium=8%,Eπ= % ??=10%,?Equilibrium=2%,?=Eπ=10%,rEquilibrium=2%,i= % ?=6%,?Equilibrium=2%,??=i=6%,rEquilibrium=2%,Eπ= % ?=0%,??=−2%,?Equilibrium=arrow_forwardSuppose a student asks an artificial intelligence (Al) the following question: "If there were a perfectly competitive insurance market in which each household could buy and sell insurance for any realized value of future stochastic income without any financial constraints other than the flow-of-funds constraint, what condition would each household's consumption satisfy in equilibrium?" Suppose the Al replies as follows: "In a perfectly competitive insurance market, households would face the same price for each insurance policy. The price of each insurance policy would equal the expected present discounted value of the future benefit of the policy in each possible state of the world. Each household would buy and sell insurance policies to maximize its expected utility, subject to its flow-of-funds constraint. This implies that _______would be equalized across households in each period in equilibrium, regardless of the realization of stochastic income."Answer the following…arrow_forward
- A common marketing tactic among many liquor stores is to offer clientele quantity (or volume) discounts. For instance, the second-leading brand of wine exported from Chile sells in the United States for $15 per bottle if the consumer purchases up to eight bottles. The price of each additional bottle is only $8. If a consumer has $200 to divide between purchasing this brand of wine and other goods, graphically illustrate how this marketing tactic affects the consumer's budget set if the price of other goods is $1. Assuming a consumer has standard indifference curves (i.e.,resembling those in Figure 4-2), will she ever purchase exactly 8 bottles of wine?arrow_forwardThe Brady family have a weekly budget of €200 to be spent on Food (F) and Other Goods (OG), which are initially equally priced at €10 and €20 per unit, respectively. Given recent inflation, the government has concerns about the ability of large families to afford an adequate diet for children. Due to this, the government announces that when Food consumption exceeds 12 units, the government will subsidise food consumption so that the price per subsequent unit will be €5 for any family. With Food on the horizontal axis, show the family’s pre and post-scheme budget line. Can we definitively determine the family’s utility maximising consumption bundle as a result of the government scheme?arrow_forwardSuppose Colin's mom has decided to take him out to breakfast to celebrate his birthday. Colin is having a hard time deciding between breakfast combo #1 (3 pancakes and 2 scrambled eggs) and breakfast combo #2 (2 pancakes and 3 scrambled eggs) because they both sound equally good to him (and since his mom is paying for breakfast, he doesn't care about how much they cost). He ends up flipping a coin to decide which one to have. Which of following the statements are true? Select all that apply. Breakfast combo #1 and breakfast combo #2 are on the same indifference curve for Colin.Breakfast combo #1 and breakfast combo #2 are on the same indifference curve for Colin. Scrambled eggs and pancakes are perfect substitutes for Colin.Scrambled eggs and pancakes are perfect substitutes for Colin. If Colin gets breakfast combo #1 his willingness to give up scrambled eggs for pancakes is likely to be lower than if he had gotten breakfast combo #2. If Colin gets breakfast combo #1…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you