EP ECONOMICS,AP EDITION-CONNECT ACCESS
20th Edition
ISBN: 9780021403455
Author: McConnell
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 7DQ
To determine
Impact of framing effect in fund raising.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Topic B Problem: Imagine you have two competing athletes who have the option to use an illegal and/or dangerous drug to enhance their performance (i.e., dope). If neither athlete dopes, then neither gains an advantage. If only one dopes, then that athlete gains a massive advantage over their competitor, reduced by the medical and legal risks of doping. However, if both athletes dope, the advantages cancel out, and only the risks remain, putting them both in a worse position than if neither had been doping.
What class concept best describes this situation? Using this class concept, what outcome do we expect from these two athletes? Are there any factors that could change the outcome predicted by this course concept?
Suppose Ishmael and Santiago are the only two fishermen who fish in Lake Hardin. Each must choose between fishing for 20 hours per week or for 40 hours per week. If both choose to fish for 20 hours per week, then each can earn a profit of $3,000 per week. If both choose to fish for 40 hours per week, then each can earn a profit of $2,000 per week. If Santiago fishes for 40 hours per week, and Ishmael fishes for 20 hours per week, then Santiago can earn a profit of $4,000 per week, and Ishmael can earn a profit of $1,000 per week. If Ishmael fishes for 40 hours per week, and Santiago fishes for 20 hours per week, then Ishmael can earn a profit of $4,000 per week, and Santiago can earn a profit of $1,000 per week.
a. Construct the weekly payoff matrix for this situation.
Ishmael
20 Hours
40 Hours
Santiago
20 Hours
$ for Santiago$ for Ishmael
$ for Santiago$ for Ishmael
40 Hours
$ for Santiago$ for Ishmael
$ for Santiago$ for Ishmael
b. What is the equilibrium outcome…
After Hurricane Maria, hundreds of nonprofit organizations streamed to Puerto Rico and other Caribbean islands to provide disaster relief. Research has found that coordination between nonprofits during disasters is difficult to maintain—it’s easy for individual nonprofits to fundraise and pursue programming on their own while ignoring other organizations working on the same issues. Additionally, there are incentives to do projects that are cheap and have fast turnaround, since donors respond to the visibility of organizations providing disaster relief.
Consider two nonprofit organizations working in Puerto Rico. Together, they could spend time coordinating their efforts and run a shelter for hurricane victims, providing each organization with 100 utils. Alternatively, they could individually distribute paper towels—a simple, low-cost, fast, and visible project—and receive 5 utils.
This situation can be modeled with the following payoff matrix:
Nonprofit 2
Run Shelter…
Chapter 8 Solutions
EP ECONOMICS,AP EDITION-CONNECT ACCESS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose you manage a large company’s marketing department and are responsible for deciding whether or not to advertise in the Super Bowl. Your team of analysts estimate that for each advertisement, your firm would generate $6 million in additional revenue for the company. It cost $7 million to run a 30-second advertisement. Therefore, your company would expect to lose $1 million in profit for each advertisement. Explain why it could still be worthwhile to purchase an advertisement, even though you know in advancethat your company would lose $1.5 million in profitarrow_forwardSuppose you have $35,000 in wealth. You have the opportunity to play a game called "Big Bet/Small Bet." In this game, you first choose whether you would like to make a big bet of $15,000 of a small bet of $5,000. You then roll a fair die. If you roll a 4, 5, or 6, you win the game and earn $15,000 for the big bet or $5,000 for the small bet. If you roll a 1, 2, or 3, you lose and lose $15,000 for the big bet and $5,000 for the small bet the game Utility U₂ U₁ BEL 0 11 LATE EE ARTE Are the Small Bet and Big Bet considered fair bets? O Big Bet is fair, but Small Bet is not. No, both are not fair. Yes, both are fair. 20 OSmall Bet is fair, but Big Bet is not. G HA 1 35 D E 1 1 1 1 1 F 1 U 50 Income (thousands of dollars)arrow_forwardKyoko and Rina are considering contributing toward the creation of a public park. Each can choose whether to contribute $300 to the public park or to keep that $300 for a weekend getaway. Since a public park is a public good, both Kyoko and Rina will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.90 of benefit. For example, if both Kyoko and Rina choose to contribute, then a total of $600 would be contributed to the public park. So, Kyoko and Rina would each receive $540 of benefit from the public park, and their combined benefit would be $1,080. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a weekend getaway is a private good, if Kyoko chooses to spend $300 on a weekend getaway, Kyoko would get $300 of benefit from the weekend getaway and Rina wouldn't receive any benefit from Kyoko's choice. If Kyoko still spends $300 on a weekend getaway and Rina chooses to contribute…arrow_forward
- 3. Consider a two-player, sequential-move game where each player can choose to play right or left. Player 1 moves first. Player 2 observes player 1's actual move and then decides to move right or left. If player 1 moves right, player 1 receives £20 and player 2 receives £45. If both move left, player 1 receives £15 and player 2 receives £30. If player 1 moves left and player 2 moves right, player 1 receives £40 and player 2 receives £40. a. Draw the above situation in the form of an extensive form game. b. Find the sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium of the extensive form game.arrow_forward4. There is a project for which player 1 can exert effort e > 0 that costs her c(e) = 0.5e2. If player 1 and player 2 can come to an agreement, then a total value of v(e) = e is produced, which can be allocated between the two players. Effort also produces a value y(e) = ke, where k = [0, 1], that player 1 can obtain for herself if player 1 and 2 fail to agree. The game has three stages: (I stage) Player 1 chooses effort e > 0; (II Stage) Player 2 observes e and chooses and effort level a € [0, 1]; (III stage) Player 1 observes a and either agrees (a) or rejects (r) the offer. If player 1 accepts the offer, then her payoff is ae - 0.5e² and player 2's payoff (1-a)e. If she rejects the offer, then player 1's payoff is ke - 0.5e² and player 2's payoff is zero. What is the subgame perfect equilibrium effort choice? ●arrow_forwardConsider the following scenario to understand the relationship between marginal and average values. Suppose Felix is a professional basketball player, and his game log for free throws can be summarized in the following table. Fill in the columns with Felix's free-throw percentage for each game and his overall free-throw average after each game. Game Game Result Total Game Free-Throw Percentage Average Free-Throw Percentage 1 6/8 6/8 75 75 2 2/8 8/16 3 2/4 10/20 8/10 18/30 5 8/10 26/40 On the following graph, use the orange points (square symbol) to plot Felix's free-throw percentage for each game individually, and use the green points (triangle symbol) to plot his overall average free-throw percentage after each game. Note: Plot your points in the order in which you would like them connected. Line segments will connect the points automatically. 100 90 Game Free-Throw Percentage 80 70 60 Average Free-Throw Percentage 50 40 E-THROW PERCENTAGEarrow_forward
- In Las Vegas, roulette is played on a wheel with 38 slots, of which 18 are black, 18 are red, and 2 are green (zero and double-zero). Your friend impulsively takes all $361 out of his pocket and bets it on black, which pays 1 for 1. This means that if the ball lands on one of the 18 black slots, he ends up with $722, and if it doesn't, he ends up with nothing. Once the croupier releases the ball, your friend panics; it turns out that the $361 he bet was literally all the money he has. While he is risk-averse - his utility function is u(x) =, where x is his roulette payoff - you are effectively risk neutral over such small stakes. a. When the ball is still spinning, what is the expected profit for the casino? b. When the ball is still spinning, what is the expected value of your friend's wealth? c. When the ball is still spinning, what is your friend's certainty equivalent (i.e., how much money would he accept with certainty to walk away from his bet). Say you propose the following…arrow_forwardSuppose that Lionel Messi is negotiating a contract with FC Barcelona. Messi has an offer from Real Madrid for $20 million a year. If he signs with FC Barcelona, they will earn $90 million in revenue from the signing. FC Barcelona's next best option is to sign Cristiano Ronaldo. They would earn $70 million from signing Ronaldo and would pay him a contract of $10 million. Messi's bargaining power is w = 1/2. a) What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargaining? What is Messi's surplus and what is FC Barcelona's surplus? b) Due to an injury, FC Barcelona would only earn $50 million from signing Ronaldo but everything else remains the same. What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargaining? What is Messi's surplus and what is FC Barcelona's surplus?arrow_forwardCheck my work Your neighbor never mows her lawn. You don't have any legal right to force her to mow, but the mess in her front yard is making your neighborhood unsightly and reducing the value of your house. The reduction in the value of your house is $5,000, and the value of her time to mow the lawn once a week is $1,000. Suppose you offer her a deal in which you pay her $3,000 to mow. How does this deal affect surplus? The deal increases both your surplus and your neighbor's. The deal increases your surplus but decreases your neighbor's. The deal does not affect surplus. The deal increases your neighbor's surplus but decreases yours. The deal increases only your neighbor's surplus. The deal increases only your surplus.arrow_forward
- Brian and Edison are considering contributing toward the creation of a public park. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the public park or to keep that $400 for a cell phone. Since a public park is a public good, both Brian and Edison will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.80 of benefit. For example, if both Brian and Edison choose to contribute, then a total of $800 would be contributed to the public park. So, Brian and Edison would each receive $640 of benefit from the public park, and their combined benefit would be $1,280. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a cell phone is a private good, if Brian chooses to spend $400 on a cell phone, Brian would get $400 of benefit from the cell phone and Edison wouldn't receive any benefit from Brian's choice. If Brian still spends $400 on a cell phone and Edison chooses to contribute $400 to the…arrow_forwardHubert and Manuel are considering contributing toward the creation of a water fountain. Each can choose whether to contribute $300 to the water fountain or to keep that $300 for a cell phone. Since a water fountain is a public good, both Hubert and Manuel will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.70 of benefit. For example, if both Hubert and Manuel choose to contribute, then a total of $600 would be contributed to the water fountain. So, Hubert and Manuel would each receive $420 of benefit from the water fountain, and their combined benefit would be $840. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a cell phone is a private good, if Hubert chooses to spend $300 on a cell phone, Hubert would get $300 of benefit from the cell phone and Manuel wouldn't receive any benefit from Hubert's choice. If Hubert still spends $300 on a cell phone and Manuel chooses to…arrow_forwardTwo fishermen (Andy and Bob) are fishing in the same lake. Each can either fish for 5 or 6 hours. Their payoffs depend on how much time each of them fishes: - If they both fish for 6 hours each, their payoff is 2 fish for Andy and 2 fish for Bob; - if they both fish for 5 hours each, their payoff is 3 fish for Andy and 3 fish for Bob; - if one fishes for 5 hours and the other for 6, then the payoff of the former is 1 fish and of the latter is 4 fish. What are the payoffs at the Nash Equilibrium if they play sequentially, and Bob plays first? (Hint: Before you choose the correct answer, write the game in a tree form and find the Nash Equilibrium) Select one: a. Andy gets 2 and Bob gets 2 b. Andy gets 3 and Bob gets 3 c. Andy gets 1 and Bob gets 4 d. Andy gets 4 and Bob gets 1arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education