(a)
Case summary: The company C makes and trades in coursepacks that contain a compilation for college students. A teacher is involved in selecting the published readings and giving it to a copy shop to make copies of such material. The publishing company B which has the copyright to some of the readings has filed a copyright infringement claim against the company C.
To find:The violation of the copyright law if copying is limited to coursepacks, the exception of copying the material under fair use and the possibility of the court to grant the motion in favor of the defendant.
(b)
Case summary: The company C makes and trades in coursepacks that contain a compilation for college students. A teacher is involved in selecting the published readings and giving it to a copy shop to make copies of such material. The publishing company B which has the copyright to some of the readings has filed a copyright infringement claim against the company C.
To explain: The impact of such infringement on the copyright owner.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 8 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
- Ganny has an idea and hires a photographer to execute his idea, Ganny pays for his or her expenses including models, film, processing, assistants, and special equipment, Does the copyright belong to Ganny? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardWhich of the following occurs when a plaintiff establishes a prima facie case in an action alleging disparate-treatment discrimination in employment in the form of an illegal discharge? Multiple Choice The burden shifts to the defendant to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that discrimination did not occur. The burden remains with the plaintiff to establish damages to a reasonable certainty. The burden remains with the plaintiff to prove discrimination beyond a reasonable doubt, a special standard in disparate-treatment cases. The burden shifts to the defendant to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the discharge.arrow_forwardTrevor Rowe a well known businessman saw an article in the gleaner that indicated that he was a jail bird. As a result, he lost customers. He wrote to the gleaner, seeking a retraction of the story, and found out that there was in fact another man in the community with the same name who had gone to jail. What is the position of either party? The Gleaner can prevent litigation by offering to make amends. The Gleaner doesn’t have to retract the story as it was true for one of the men. There is no action as the story was already published. The businessman can go straight to Court. There is no action at there are two persons with the same name.arrow_forward
- Whistleblowing cannot be practiced in the absence of a whistleblowing law. * False True Dani established a small business with his wife, father, and two children. These family members are neither receiving regular salaries nor being registered at the NSSF, but merely helping Dani run his business operations. Thus, the relationship between Dani and his family members is governed by the Lebanese Labor Law. * False True The forms of evidence which are required for blowing the whistle externally to the court are exclusively the visual ones. * False True Trade secrets give the firm a competitive advantage because they may not be within the general knowledge of the industry and may not be easily duplicated without involving considerable time, effort or expense. * True False Dani and Rima separately produced the same invention, but only Dani applied to the Ministry of Economy and Trade. Then only Dani has the right for legal protection. * False True A description of a machine could be…arrow_forward1) At the end of all her written communications, employee writes "have a blessed day." One of employer's most important clients requests that employee not do so and employer asks employee to stop. Employee refuses, saying it is a part of her religion. If employee sues the employer for religious discrimination, is she likely to win? 2) A Michigan Holiday Inn fired a pregnant employee because the "very Christian" staff members were very upset by her talk of having an abortion. Has the employer violated Title VII? 3) A police officer who is assigned to a casino refuses the assignment, claiming his Baptist religion prohibits him from gambling or being around gambling. Is he legitimately able to do so? Respond to the questions list in each with support / justificaiton from fact / law / regulation. Cite as appropriate. A paragraph for each (1pg-ish) should do the trick.arrow_forwardRim Corporation makes tire rims that it sells to Superior Vehicles, Inc., which installs them on cars. One set ofrims is defective, which an inspection would reveal. Superior does not inspect the rims. The car with the defectiverims is sold to Town Auto Sales, which sells the car toUri. Soon, the car is in an accident caused by the defective rims, and Uri is injured. Is Superior Vehicles liable?Explain your answer. (See Strict Product Liability.)arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education