EBK MICROECONOMICS
2nd Edition
ISBN: 8220103679701
Author: List
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 9, Problem 4P
(a)
To determine
The individual
(b)
To determine
The overall demand curve for both the individuals if paintings are private goods.
(c)
To determine
The new social benefit curve if paintings are public goods.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Consider two consumers (1; 2), each with income M to allocate between two goods. Good 1 provides 1 unit of consumption to its purchaser and units of consumption to the other consumer. Each consumer i, i = 1; 2, has the utility function is consumption of good 1 and is consumption of good 2. a. Provide an interpretation of α. b. Suppose that good 2 is a private good. Find the Nash equilibrium levels of consumption when both goods have a price of 1. c. By maximizing the sum of utilities, show that the equilibrium is Pareto-ancient if α = 0 but incident for all other values of α. d. Now suppose that good 2 also provides 1 unit of consumption to its purchaser and a, 0 ≤ α ≤ 1, units of consumption to the other consumer. For the same preferences, find the Nash equilibrium and show that it is ancient for all values of α. e. Explain the conclusion in part d.
Suppose that two individuals, Jon and David, form a community and would like to construct a communal fort that would protect them from attacks. They consume both good X, a private good, and the protection from the fort, P. One unit of good X costs 1 unit while one unit of P costs 2 units, so the budget constraint for each is given by: Xi + 2Pi = 100. Both Jon and David have an income of 100 and a utility function of the form:
U = log(Xi) + 2log(Pj + Pd)
(a) How much protection, P, will be privately provided? What is optimal consumption of X, the private good?
(b) What are the socially optimal amounts of protection, P, and consumption, X, of the private good? How do the socially optimal amounts compare to that privately provided? Explain why.
Anne has just purchased a new house in a lovely neighborhood. Her neighbors are friendly and even brought her house-warming gifts. Anne, however, has a problem. Her neighbors have cats, and Anne hates cats. Even though the city has a law requiring all outdoor pets to be on a leash, her neighbors ignore it, and the cats roam all over Anne's property.
How would an economist describe this situation? Is there anything Anne can do? Can you think of a Coase- like private solution?
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Scenario 4 Suppose there are two residents in a neighborhood, Tana and Jason. Tana's demand for clean streets is Q = 100 – 4P. Jason's demand for clean streets is Q = 80 – 2P. If your answer is not a whole number, please make sure to round to the nearest hundredth. Refer to Scenario 4. Find the social demand curve for clean streets in this neighborhood. What is the y-intercept of the social demand curve? (Do not enter a dollar sign in your answer)arrow_forwardSuppose there are two consumers A and B, and two goods x and y. A’s utility function has the following form UA = xA – (xB)-1. Which of the following is true? Consumer B's consumption of good x exhibits a negative externality. Consumer A's consumption of good x exhibits a negative externality. Consumer B's consumption of good x exhibits a positive externality. Consumer A's consumption of good x exhibits a positive externality.arrow_forwardIn experiments in which participants voluntarily contribute to the provision of a public good, we often find a reduction in contributions in successive rounds of the experiment. We can explain this as Group of answer choices Evidence of participants reaching satiation and not wanting such high levels of the public good. Evidence of participants working out the Nash equilibrium outcome of the voluntary contribution game. Evidence of participants reducing cooperation to punish free riding. Evidence of participants learning how to play the game more effectively.arrow_forward
- There are two firms, whose production activity consumes some of the clean air that surrounds our planet. The total amount of clean air is K > 0, and any consumption of clean air comes out of this common resource. If firm i ∈ {1, 2} uses ki of clean air for its production, the remaining amount of clean air is K − k1 − k2. Each player derives utility from using ki for production and from the remainder of clean air. The payoff of firm i is given by ui(ki , kj ) = ln(ki) + ln(K − ki − kj ) j ≠ i ∈ {1, 2}. (a) Assuming that each firm chooses ki ∈ (0, K), to maximize its payoff function, derive the players’ best response functions and find a Nash equilibrium. (b) Is the equilibrium you found in (a) unique or not? What are equilibrium payoffs?arrow_forwardEvaluate the following statement: "When it comes to public goods, individuals do not reveal their true preferences because it is not in their self-interest to do so."arrow_forwardConsider an economy with a private good and public good. The economyconsists of two consumers whose utility functions are:u1(x1, y) = 1/2 ln x1 +1/2 ln y and u2(x2, y) = 1/3 ln x2 +2/3 ln y.The endowment of consumer 1 is w1 = 2, and endowment of consumer 2 is w2 = 3, both in units of private goods. The production of public good uses the linear technology y = z. 1. Find Lindahl equilibrium.arrow_forward
- In a Lindahl equilibrium, which of the following is true: All individuals pay the same tax shares. Individuals who have a higher demand for public goods consume more public goods. The quantity of public goods consumed is more than the quantity of private goods. The quantity of public goods provided satisfies the Samuelson rule.arrow_forwardA husband and wife would produce incomes Yh and Yw in their fallback situations. The utility each derives in any circumstance is just equal to his or her consumption expenditure in that circumstance. In their fallback situations, their consumption expenditure levels are just equal to their incomes. Thus their fallback levels of utility are Yh and Yw. If they cooperate, they produce Z>Yh + Yw. They engage in Nash cooperative bargaining to determine how to allocate Z across the consumption of the husband, Ch, and consumption of the wife, Cw, subject to the budget constraint that Ch + Cw = Z. Under any bargained allocation, the two would derive utilities of Ch and Cw. a) The surplus associated with cooperation is S = Z − Yh − Yw. Show that each spouse consumes his or her fallback income plus half the surplus in the Nash cooperative bargaining solution. Please do fast ASAP fast please.arrow_forwardA husband and wife would produce incomes Yh and Yw in their fallback situations. The utility each derives in any circumstance is just equal to his or her consumption expenditure in that circumstance. In their fallback situations, their consumption expenditure levels are just equal to their incomes. Thus their fallback levels of utility are Yh and Yw. If they cooperate, they produce Z>Yh + Yw. They engage in Nash cooperative bargaining to determine how to allocate Z across the consumption of the husband, Ch, and consumption of the wife, Cw, subject to the budget constraint that Ch + Cw = Z. Under any bargained allocation, the two would derive utilities of Ch and Cw. What do Ch and Cw equal if Yh = Yw (but this quantity is not equal to zero)? Please do fast ASAP fastarrow_forward
- Refer to Table 8-1 in Question 9. Suppose the cost to build the park is $24 per acre and that the residents have agreed to split the cost of building the park equally, as in Question 10. If the residents decide to build a park with size equal to the number of acres that maximizes total social surplus from the park, how much total surplus (i.e., net benefit) will Xavier receive? (enter just the number, no $)arrow_forwardThe figure below presents data for two families (1 and 2), including their travel cost per trip (p1,p2) and the number of trips they take (q1,q2). Assume that the families are identical except for their travel costs. The figure below presents a marginal willingness to pay (demand) curve. Consider family 2 experiencing this amenity--what area characterizes the: i. Total benefits ii. total costs iii. Net benefitsarrow_forwardnetwork externalities: (multiple choice) reduce the cost of switching to new technologies without network externalities. can explain why more efficient technologies displace less efficient technologies. can explain why the economy fails to adopt the most efficient technologies. can explain why technological lock-in no longer occurs.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education