EBK MATERIALS FOR CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTIO
4th Edition
ISBN: 8220102719569
Author: ZANIEWSKI
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 9, Problem 9.35QP
To determine
The design asphalt content according to the Marshall procedure.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The mix design for an asphalt concrete mixture requires 2 to 6% minus
0.075 mm. The three aggregates shown in Table P.5.34 are available.
TABLE P5.34
Minus 0.075 mm
Coarse
0.5%
Intermediate
1.5%
Fine Aggregate
11.5%
Considering that approximately equal amounts of coarse and intermediate
aggregate will be used in the mix, what is the percentage of fine aggregate that
will give a resulting minus 0.075 mm in the mixture in the middle of the
range, about 4%?
The mixture maximum specific gravity at
5.0 % asphalt binder content is 2.495. The
asphalt specific gravity is 1.030. Compute
the aggregate effective specific gravity.
Estimate the mixture maximum specific
gravity at 6.0 % asphalt binder content.
The Marshall method was used to design an asphalt concrete mixture. A PG 64-22 asphalt cement with a specific gravity (Gb) of 1.031 was used. The mixture contains a 9.5 mm nominal maximum particle size aggregate with a bulk specific gravity (Gsb) of 2.696. The theoretical maximum specific gravity of the mix (Gmm) at asphalt content of 5.0% is 2.470. Trial mixes were made with average results as shown in the following table:Determine the design asphalt content using the Asphalt Institute design criteria formedium traffic Table . Assume a design air void content of 4% when usingTable
Chapter 9 Solutions
EBK MATERIALS FOR CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTIO
Ch. 9 - Prob. 9.1QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.2QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.3QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.4QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.5QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.6QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.7QPCh. 9 - What are the engineering applications of each of...Ch. 9 - Prob. 9.9QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.10QP
Ch. 9 - Prob. 9.11QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.12QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.13QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.14QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.15QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.16QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.17QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.18QPCh. 9 - What are the objectives of the asphalt concrete...Ch. 9 - Prob. 9.20QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.21QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.22QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.23QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.24QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.25QPCh. 9 - An asphalt concrete mixture includes 94% aggregate...Ch. 9 - Prob. 9.27QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.28QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.29QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.30QPCh. 9 - Based on the data shown in Table P9.31, select the...Ch. 9 - Based on the data in Table P9.32, determine the...Ch. 9 - Given the data in Table P9.33, select the blend...Ch. 9 - The Marshall method of mix design has been widely...Ch. 9 - Prob. 9.35QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.36QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.37QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.38QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.39QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.40QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.41QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.42QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.43QPCh. 9 - What is the purpose of adding fly ash to asphalt...Ch. 9 - Prob. 9.45QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.47QPCh. 9 - Prob. 9.48QP
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, civil-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Given the specifications for an asphaltic concrete mixture and the results of a sieve analysis, determine the proportion of different aggregates to obtain the required gradation. Coarse aggregates: 60% Fine aggregates: 35% Filler: 5%arrow_forwardE Q2: Two types of asphalt cement (A and B) have been tested with different temperatures to indicate the kinematic viscosity and the table below presented the results. 1- Draw the viscosity vs temperature chart, 2- Indicate the raixing and compaction temperatures ranges for each type, 3- Which one is more susceptible to temperature change? 130 140 Temperature, C Kinematic viscosity, centistoke Type A Type B 600 800 420 500 150 300 290 160 220 180 Dis 170 D857arrow_forwardThe Marshall method was used to design an asphalt concrete mixture. A PG 64-22 asphalt cement with a specific gravity (Gp) of 1.031 was used. The mixture contains a 9.5 mm nominal maximum particle size aggregate with a bulk specific gravity (Gab) of 2.696. The theoretical maximum specific gravity of the mix (Gmm) at asphalt con- tent of 5.0% is 2.470. Trial mixes were made with average results as shown in the following table: Asphalt Content (P.) (% by Weight of Mix) Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) Corrected Stability (kN) Flow (0.25 mm) 4.0 2.360 6.3 4.5 2.378 6.7 10 5.0 2.395 5.4 12 5.5 2.405 5.1 15 6.0 2.415 4.7 22 Determine the design asphalt content using the Asphalt Institute design criteria for medium traffic (Table 9.15). Assume a design air void content of 4% when using Table 9.16.arrow_forward
- The Superpave volumetric procedure has been widely implemented, with success- ful results. However, the method lacks a strength test to verify the suitability of the Superpave mixes. Research completed in NCHRP Project 9-19 developed "simple performance tests" for asphalt concrete (Witczak et al., 2002), currently called the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester, AMPT, Figure 9.34. The AMPT is not currently a requirement for Superpave mix design, but implementation studies are underway. In addition, the test method was designed to capture the material properties needed for the Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design System, MEPDS. The equipment and associated protocols of the AMPT tests are designed to cap- ture the viscoelastic behavior of asphalt concrete. Tests based on measurement of dynamic modulus (for both of permanent deformation and fatigue cracking), flow time (permanent deformation), and flow number (permanent deformation) were selected for further field validation. The three…arrow_forward9.37 The Marshall procedure was used to design an asphalt concrete mixture for a heavy-traffic road. Asphalt cement with a specific gravity of 1.025 is to be used. The mixture contains a 19 mm nominal maximum particle size aggre- gate, with bulk specific gravity of 2.654. The theoretical maximum specific gravity of the mix is 2.480 at 4.5% asphalt content. Trial mixes were made, with the average results shown in Table P9.37. Determine the optimum asphalt content using the Asphalt Institute design criteria (see Table 9.14). Assume a design air void content of 4% when using Table 9.15. Table P9.37 Asphalt Content, % by Weight Bulk Specific Gravity Stability, kN Flow, 0.25 mm 3.5 2.367 8.2 7.3 4.0 2.371 8.6 9.4 4.5 2.389 7.5 11.5 5.0 2.410 7.2 12.5 5.5 2.422 6.9 13.2arrow_forwardAn aggregate blend is composed of 65% coarse aggregate by weight (SG 2.65), 30% fine aggregate (SG 2.70), and 5% filler (SG 2.75). The compacted specimen contains 6% asphalt binder (SG 105) by weight of total mix, and has a bulk densit of 2.255 Mg/m&3. Ignoring absorption.a. What is the percent voids fill with asphalt?b. What is the percent voids in mineral aggregates?c. What is the percent voids in total mix?arrow_forward
- 9.25 An aggregate blend is composed of 59% coarse aggregate by weight (Sp. Gr. 2.635), 36% fine aggregate (Sp. Gr. 2.710), and 5% filler (Sp. Gr. 2.748). The compacted specimen contains 6% asphalt binder (Sp. Gr. 1.088) by weight of total mix and has a bulk density of 2305 kg/m³. Ignoring absorption, compute the percent voids in total mix, percent voids in mineral aggregate, and the percent voids filled with asphalt.arrow_forwardProblem #1 The following figure shows the results from the dynamic modulus test for asphalt mixtures. The specimen is 4" in diameter and 6" in height. The gauge length for the axial LVDT is 4". Time lag is 0.25s. Find |E*I, and phase angle . Axial force(lbf) 65 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -65 0 Dynamic modulus test result (gauge length = 4") 0.5 Time (second) 1 0.0010 0.0009 0.0006 0.0003 0 force (lbf) disp (in.) -0.0003 -0.0006 -0.0009 -0.0010 1.5 Axial displacement(in) 4"arrow_forwardAn aggregate blend is composed of 59% coarse aggregate by weight (Sp. Gr.2.635), 36% fine aggregate (Sp. Gr. 2.710), and 5% filler (Sp. Gr. 2.748). Thecompacted specimen contains 6% asphalt binder (Sp. Gr. 1.088) by weight oftotal mix and has a bulk density of 2305 kg/m3 . Ignoring absorption, computethe percent voids in total mix, percent voids in mineral aggregate, and thepercent voids filled with asphalt.arrow_forward
- An asphalt concrete mixture is to be designed according to the Marshall procedure. A PG 64-22 asphalt cement with a specific gravity (Gb) of 1.00 is to be used. A dense aggregate blend is to be used, with a maximum aggregate size of 3/4 in. and a bulk specific gravity (Gsb) of 2.786. The theoretical maximum specific gravity of the mix (Gmm), at asphalt content of 4.5%, is 2.490. Trial mixes were made with average results as shown in Table . Using a spreadsheetprogram, plot the appropriate six graphs necessary for the Marshall procedure and select the optimum asphalt content, using the Asphalt Institute design criteria for medium traffic(see Table . Assume a design air void content of 4% when using Tablearrow_forwardAn aggregate blend for an asphalt concrete mixture has the following composition by weight: Coarse aggregate Fine aggregate 65% Specific (bulk) gravity of coarse agg. 35% Specific (bulk) gravity of fine agg. = 2.70 = 2.65 This aggregate blend was mixed with asphalt cement (G, =1.03) at an asphalt content of 5.5% by weight of mixture (ignore absorbed asphalt). A volumetric analysis was conducted and it was determined that the %VMA for the mix was 15.5%. Determine Gmb Of the mixture.arrow_forwardThe mix design for an asphalt concrete mixture requires 2 to 6% minus No.200. The three aggregates shown in Table are available.Considering that approximately equal amounts of coarse and intermediateaggregate will be used in the mix, what is the percentage of fine aggregate that will give a resulting minus No. 200 in the mixture in the middle of the range,about 4%?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Traffic and Highway EngineeringCivil EngineeringISBN:9781305156241Author:Garber, Nicholas J.Publisher:Cengage Learning
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9781305156241
Author:Garber, Nicholas J.
Publisher:Cengage Learning