of Executive Function Piloted with At-Risk Adolescents In this article the researchers wanted to see if there is a difference in outcome based on lower socioeconomic and poverty stricken adolescents where executive functioning was concerned. The brain during adolescents is continuing to mature by leaps and bounds; however, the pre frontal cortex is still not quite matured. This particular area of the brain is where self and impulse control and more complex thinking are being controlled. Many
Kelly Featherston Article Summary – Psych 302 Introduction Ullsperger, Bylsma, and Botvinick (2005) investigated whether the findings of Mayr, Awh, and Laurey (2003) can be replicated and how much they can be shown across different task performances. Their specific study was motivated by a prior experiment where Gratton, Coles, and Donchin (1992) found that after an incompatible type trial reaction times were reduced and target processing occurred more frequently than flanker processing on the
brain automaticity and how it processes certain functions. In reference, to the independent and dependent variables involved, the independent variable in this experiment would be the color word followed by the conflicting color and the dependent would be the time that it took for the applicant to make a decision. At the conclusion of the lab, applicants were to record their results as well as the group data results and new findings of how the brain functions under certain processes. However, the age differences
Based on my experience with the Stroop effect I have concluded the test with the conflicting words and colors showed increased complexity. I realized during the test that the incompatible inputs created conflict in my mind. In order for me to formulate a response I had to disqualify an input and validate the solution prior to the final answer. According to George Washington University’s cognitive psychology department this phenomena is due to the top down processing theory. This theory
The participants were also told to draw a line in an ascending pattern (from 1 to A; A to 2; 2 to B and so on)” and join all numbers and letters together. However, low scores in both parts of the TMT tests indicate an improved performance (Hayes et al., 2011). Another six studies test performed during the study was Stroop Color and Word test. The test score was based on observing the participants performance. The participants were asked to call out the color letters printed in black ink in 45 seconds
Abstract The aim of this experiment is to study autonomic processes by replicating the previously carried out Stroop effect by using numbers. A number of 180 random participants aged in between 18-89 were recruited to participate in this experiment. Participants were presented with a stroop experiment task sheet which consists of three parts which was the control, congruent and incongruent conditions. Time was taken and recorded for each participant to say out the number of stars in the control condition
effect was tested on four different tasks. Nineteen Queens College students were recruited by flyer, and each were assigned to a word reading task, color reading task, color inhibition task, and word inhibition task. They were timed using a stopwatch function on a cell phone, to name the color, or word to the quickest of their ability. In the order from longest reaction time to shortest: inhibition color naming task, color naming task, inhibition word reading, and word reading. This study shows that
Discussion on the data The results of this study provide an abundance amount of information, but not all may correlate with the hypothesis. Also, there were a few underlying questions that would hopefully be found in the results of this experiment. First, the question of which age group was more susceptible to proactive interference cannot be determined because there is not an even amount of ages found in this study; there would need to be a larger sample size with a more divers, yet equal amount
The Stroop effect is demonstrated by the reaction time to determine a color when the color is printed in a different color’s name. Participants respond slower or make more errors when the meaning of the word is incongruent with the color of the word. Despite knowing the meaning of the word, participants showed incapability of ignoring the stimulus attribute. This reflects a clear instance of semantic interference and an unfathomed failure of selective attention (Stroop, 1935). In the study of the
To understand the concept of Stroop effect, learning the definition is the first step in learning. To define the meaning, it is “a test for this effect in which individuals are presented with lists of color words in matching and non-matching colors and the time they take to read the different words, or the number of errors they make, is recorded.” (Stroop effect | definition of Stroop effect by Medical dictionary). With Stroop effect, we try to recognize and identify such colors and numbers. In the