John Searle Essay

In his essay, Minds, Brains, and Computers, John Searle attempts to prove that Strong AI does not exist. He still believes that there is some merit to weak AI, as a means for understanding how certain elements of the brain function, but using computers as a way of not only mimicking the brain but actually being a mind. The most concrete example that Searle used in support of his claim was that computers cannot understand, and he demonstrated this through the Chinese Room experiment. In the Chinese

In anticipation of possible replies to his findings, Searle explained the possible arguments against his Chinese room thought experiment and replied to them. In one of these arguments, Searle explains what he calls the “Systems Reply.” In this reply, although the man in the Chinese room himself is unable to understand Chinese, the system as a whole, the man, the prompting screen, the rule book, etc., does understand. In rebuttal, Searle simply supposes that the man internalizes all of the knowledge

I sit in the cold wooden desk of the dimly lit classroom and stare at the board and the back of the tall, slightly robust man in front of us as he attempts to explain derivatives. I understand that he's explaining a topic and showing us a procedure that would help us solve the problem. However, I don't understand why we're doing it that way or why he's doing what he's doing, I ask for further clarification. With his back still facing me he quickly says “Hold on,” as he continues to scribble a combination

Introduction I am going to argue that Searle is correct to claim that digital computers are not capable of genuine understanding. I believe computers are told what to do without any genuine understanding of what the computers are doing. It is impossible for a computer programmed machine to think. Word Count: 48 Exposition Searle believes that machines have no way of genuinely understanding of what they are doing. He believes that the mind and body are one and there is no way of a computer interacting

When Searle talks about institutional facts I believe that he has great insight into the way people take items and place values on them. These values are universally accepted and become a social reality in our social world. These social realities have functions that man has assigned to them to dictate what they are intended to do. I will walk through Searle’s features needed in a social reality and it will become clear that all social realities have these features. But where Searle ideas are

talks about in order to use them against counterarguments. My view is that consciousness comes from the underlying molecular structures of our brain that control neurotransmitters which in turn creates our states of mind. I believe this because In John Searle's Ted talk "Our Shared Condition" he claims that "consciousness is a biological phenomenon" (2:57) and goes on to give the example of how the liquidity of water is created by the structure of the hydrogen and oxygen molecules.(5:33) So the

Compare and contrast the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism John Searle developed a theory where he recognized there is a mental and a physical, like substance dualism for Rene Descartes, the difference is that he held they may be two aspect of a single substance. In the other hand, Descartes beliefs that dualism is composed of two different substances which are mind and body. One is physical, our body and the other is nonphysical, our mind where our thoughts and feelings exist. He

make human different from other thinking processors. These questions made some Theoreticians to look for answers. They knew our brain is somehow like a complicated computer, so they asked if a computer could think such as we do. Alan Turing, and John Searle had different opinions about the subject based on their experiments. The Turing test designed by Alan Turing to test if a computer has a level of intelligence such as human or not. A human judge is in a room connected to another person, or just

idea was explored by John R. Searle, in his book titled, Minds, Brains, and Science. The author is a renowned American philosopher, particularly in the philosophy of language and mind, and is currently teaching at the University of California, in Berkeley (“John R. Searle,” 2014). Searle earned his Ph.D. in philosophy at Oxford, and has made several contributions to his field on topics, such as consciousness, artificial intelligence, and the problem of free will (“John R. Searle,” 2014). His “Chinese

Chinese Room Scenario by John R. Searle Through the use of his famous Chinese room scenario, John R. Searle tries to prove there is no way artificial intelligence can exist. This means that machines do not posses minds. The debate between those who are in favor of strong and weak artificial intelligence (AI) is directly related to the philosophy of mind. The claim of weak AI is that it is possible to run a program on a machine, which will behave as if it were a thinking thing. Believers