Moral Theory Essay

Moral Responsibility The theory of moral responsibility by Aristotle will be used as a foundation to analysis the moral responsibility on dream. The theory is used because Aristotle is the earliest philosopher who discuss about moral responsibility in Nicomachean Ethic. Aristotle concept of moral responsibility is focus on “the role of knowledge in taking the proper course of action” (Hsieh). According to Aristotle, moral responsibility is the notion that “it is sometimes appropriate to respond to

the lever and kill one in order to save five lives. However, this moral theory does not compare with the majority of people’s instincts– this suggests that act-utilitarianism is problematic and does not allow for society’s general intuitions. In order to make an objection to act-utilitarianism, I think it is essential to compare two distinct trolley problems and equate both the objection to act-utilitarianism and its moral theory – in doing so, we will have a more precise result and also see the

Normative Theories: Ethical and Moral Obligations The ability to apply morality to the resolution of life’s ethical issues in an appropriate manner has been the focus of philosophers for centuries. Morality, can be best defined as to what degree any action or inaction is deemed right or wrong, good or bad. However, the meaning of right and wrong, along with the application of these beliefs have been the catalyst for much debate spawning what is known as normative theory. The analysis of complex ethical

Utilitarianism is one of the most renowned and influential moral theories. The basis of act utilitarianism is maximizing utility, that is, doing the things that maximize happiness over suffering. Utilitarians reject moral codes that are based on customs or traditions given by leaders or supernatural deities because they judge the truth or justifiability of morality as its positive contribution to all beings. Both act utilitarians and rule utilitarians concur that the overall aim in determining the

The following are just some fo the many considerations raised by those who wish to determine whether utilitarianism is a valid moral theory. Utilitarianism 0 n January 29, 1993, Steven Page, the man-ager of a horticulture nursery, threw his three-year-old daughter, Kale,' from the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco and then jumped to his own death. Earlier that day, he had shot and killed his thirty-seven-year-old ex-wife, Nancy. Local police were mystified about his mo-tive, and neighbors were

limitations of power that the government can have over its’ citizens with the Parent/ Child versus Law argument presented by Jean Hampton in “The Moral Education Theory of Punishment”. Hampton says that parents are much more entitled to punish their children than any other institution, and particularly governments, as parents have the role of what Hampton dubs “moral paternalism,” which is to teach their children the entire content of morality. Other Philosophers such as John Stuart Mill have also rejected

III. Explain East Asian moral theory and practice. (Sources: lectures; de Bary; Yao) In East Asian culture, morality is topic that can be applied to several aspects of life. Morality encompasses “politics, religion, education, psychology, and metaphysics” (Yao, 34). Many of the thoughts and actions taken by individuals in the culture are said to be directed by the idea that you must be moral. It is a culture that is largely based on having to cooperate and on being able to develop the self; this

paper, I intend to show that utilitarian theory of moral status is much more preferable than deontological approach. I will demonstrate this idea by using by using the concept of moral laws by Immanuel Kant and John Mill along with Peter Singer’s Speciesism and Moral Status. Moral status is a term that deals with who and what is more valuable, or have higher quality, in which they should be treated specially; and both deontological and utilitarian aspect of moral status is different from one and another

Utilitarianism is one of the general moral theories of normative ethics, which is made up of two principles: utility and equality. Utility is to maximize things like happiness, pleasure, and desire-satisfaction. Equality is the principle that the interests of all members of the moral community who are involved are completely equal. The utilitarian theory, therefore, tries to create the most amount of well being and the least amount of displeasure or suffering. To apply the utilitarian view to whether

not Objectivism, which is a moral theory that states that there are certain moral standards that everyone should follow regardless of their opinion and indifference towards them. Cultural relativism is one of the two forms of Ethical Relativism. The latter one belongs to a form of moral skepticism. It states that moral standards are not objective, but relative to the standards of a person or a society. Consequently, cultural relativism is based on the belief that a moral standard is correct only when